Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.8%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 72 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 152 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 108 23.8%

  • Total voters
    454
So Russ isn't testifying and neither are his witnesses. He's going to present what at trial, exactly?
Probably a presentation of his feelings & opinions which he assumes must be followed to the letter because he has a frozen face so must always get his way. If not, then he has been discriminated against. Clearly. Just Shitlips things. Knock on the wood of a good ol’ fashioned keytar that this ends sooner than later. It’s been years & many miles of absolutely frivolous bullshit.
keytar radical.png
 
Will the show cause hearing with the judge still go forward on Monday?
God I hope so!
Considering Hardin is doing the judge's job for him (by forcing Greer into semi-workable legal positions), they should outsource that hearing to Hardin anyway. His emails have forced way more progress in this case than any court order has.
 
I guess it was inevitable, but we're going into a court case where there is apparently no evidence that anything happened. What even happens during the rest of discovery then? Does Greer subpoena Null to ask him where all the cheese is?
And at copyright case in which the defendant has never hosted or possessed the copyrighted material he is being sued over.
 
Russ(tard) is not standing trial, but pressing the trial. He can walk away at anytime he wants, unlike a defendant who is at the mercy of the plaintiff and the court.

I realize that, which is why I asked. The notion of a lawyer asking the court to have the plaintiff in a case undergo a competency hearing amuses me. I wanted to know if it's even technically possible to request.
 
I realize that, which is why I asked. The notion of a lawyer asking the court to have the plaintiff in a case undergo a competency hearing amuses me. I wanted to know if it's even technically possible to request.
Being labeled a vexatious litigant is basically that. It usually requires the asshole to file with the judge before anything can proceed.
 
Well at risk of being the new thread kicking child... And because I'm an idiot. Briefly to recap:

Greer has to show cause for being a dipshit in disclosing witnesses on the 23rd of December.

Court has not replied to any docket after that, including attempted witness tampering (which is now moot there are no witnesses?). - Status whenever the court feels like it

Greer has issued a retraction to the court for most of his badmouthing Hardin, but not for what he said to Nathan and Scott (albeit those don't seem actionable). Presumably this is to avoid consequences due to going way the fuck over the line. - Russ dodges.

Greer has agreed he has no witnesses. - legally binding ish

Greer has stated in writing to Hardin he has no documentation or other physical evidence. - this is where I assume related to the show cause... He could still produce this evidence now? Idk. I'm lost in the retard sauce of this case.

Feb deposition dates are moot - no witnesses to depose.

If the judge doesn't finally kill this case which, as an activist russhole licking fag he won't if he doesn't have to ....

Where the hell can this case possibly go? I add up the above and 2+2+Russ = WTFBBQ

I know the reasonable answer is the judge tosses this shit with prejudice and it ends. But what's the unreasonable answer?
 
The last filing was done jointly with Hardin though. Greer co-signed it. This is not something Hardin is imposing on him, he agreed to it.
Yeah, but with as disingenuous as Russ has been so far throughout this case, it would not be out of character for him to later whine and complain that Hardin bullied and coerced him into signing.
 
If the judge doesn't finally kill this case which, as an activist russhole licking fag he won't if he doesn't have to ....

Where the hell can this case possibly go? I add up the above and 2+2+Russ = WTFBBQ

I know the reasonable answer is the judge tosses this shit with prejudice and it ends. But what's the unreasonable answer?

I'm super interested in how the judge will try to spin this shit in Greer's favor. He's been handed a plateful of utter and complete shit so I would think the judge or more probably the clerk whose pulling the strings, will need a few weeks to try to come up with some way to save Greer's ass.

I am keenly awaiting his honor's response to this steaming pile of cow shit that Russ'tard has plopped out onto his desk.

Let's see the acrobatics involved in somehow allowing Greer to continue despite the fact he now has no facts, no witnesses, no deposition to give and no arguments to plead for how evil genius overlord Josh Moon stole his copyrights and made millions off it by allowing someone else to post a link to another site in his forum.

Go on Mr Judge Man...lets see how well you contort now.
 
Yeah, but with as disingenuous as Russ has been so far throughout this case, it would not be out of character for him to later whine and complain that Hardin bullied and coerced him into signing.
He's probably going to argue KF bullied his witnesses into silence, and that the only reason he signed that filing was to protect them from further "bullying".
 
Just out of curiosity could Hardin request a competency hearing for Greer to see if he's fit to stand at trial? Even if he could, I don't think any judge would grant such a request, as much as they might think Russ may deserve it.
Greer is a Pro Se + In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff. The Judge can toss this at any time if it becomes apparent that the defendant appears to be a deranged incompetent lunatic retard who is arguing nothing in the law.
Will the show cause hearing with the judge still go forward on Monday?
God I hope so!
I think that is a deadline where Russ has to file a pleading as to why he should not be sanctioned. I don't believe it's a hearing? Am I wrong on that?
I'm super interested in how the judge will try to spin this shit in Greer's favor. He's been handed a plateful of utter and complete shit so I would think the judge or more probably the clerk whose pulling the strings, will need a few weeks to try to come up with some way to save Greer's ass.

I am keenly awaiting his honor's response to this steaming pile of cow shit that Russ'tard has plopped out onto his desk.

Let's see the acrobatics involved in somehow allowing Greer to continue despite the fact he now has no facts, no witnesses, no deposition to give and no arguments to plead for how evil genius overlord Josh Moon stole his copyrights and made millions off it by allowing someone else to post a link to another site in his forum.

Go on Mr Judge Man...lets see how well you contort now.
I am slightly more optimistic that the Judicial Calculus of "Reversible Error" is leaning more in Nulls favor than drippy's currently. There is just too much blatant bad faith and fraud upon the court to ignore or hand wave away. I have more to say on this. But it can wait until Tuesday. I think we may have reached or are nearing the threshold where the Judge really will not have much choice.
 
I suspect he’s going to do this or similar for now:

View attachment 6774543

I certainly wouldn’t want to be writing responses to this shit on Dec 24.
Mr. Greer correctly points out that contacting the witnesses listed to ascertain the nature of the testimony they would provide as per Mr. Greer's assertations that they have witnessed Mr. Moon's foul deeds does meet the threshold of sustained harassment of Mr. Greer and his kin. This court hereby banishes Mr. Hardin to the shadow realm where he must litigate against a Hellish facsimile of Mr. Greer for the remainder of eternity.
 
Back