Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 13.8%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 115 24.5%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 85 18.1%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 199 42.3%
  • Total voters
    470
Balldo's Gate said:
This is the doctor whose Quora post Nick Rekieta is citing

View attachment 6857318

View attachment 6857316
(Archive)

He is a Minneapolis weight loss doctor mentioned in the Star Tribune article below.

According to the article, he spent 5 years in prison for involvement in an illegal drug lab. He says he was wrongly convicted though.

View attachment 6857315View attachment 6857324View attachment 6857336
(Star Tribune | Archive)
Click to expand...
This guy completed his medical degree and never did a residency. A non-practicing doctor!

Non-practicing lawyer getting his information from a non-practicing doctor, truth is stranger than fiction.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Time of Space, no-exit, Hongourable Madisha and 99 others
Harm said:
Oh man, once he finds out that he doesn't need to jump through those hoops and he can ship crates of "research chemicals" to his home willy-nilly then it's game over.
Click to expand...
This has always been my pet theory. There are obvious signs of being high on nitrous, such as a low voice and slow speech. I assumed he bought shady research chemicals that just have random letters and numbers for names and have effects similar to common uppers. These usually don't show up on drug tests.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Pedophobe, USAroXX and 3 others
Sam Losco said:
This nigger actually said aideu. Pretentiousness is off the fucking chart.

"Aideu my dear Lance Corporal Captain. Your IQ is sadly not able to keep up with the Quora Dr that runs illegal drug labs."
Click to expand...
He said the same thing in his first cope stream back to fans who "would assume he did the things the GOVERNMENT said he did". I don't know whats faggier - his gay little sayings or the fact he says them as catchphrases.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Scout Trooper, Thunderous Lightning, Peanut Butter Trails and 6 others
The Mass Shooter Ron Soye said:
Is the hacking thing expected to derail his plea deal, or is it merely hype?
Click to expand...
We're going to have to wait and see. Aaron's retarded and will just say shit but he also has retard luck so law enforcement may actually be following up on the unauthorized access thing. But if it is for real it's probably going to fuck up probation for Rackets, if he hasn't already done that all on his own.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: 6thRanger, Thunderous Lightning, Blackhole and 9 others
SaidNoOneEver said:
Ah you're right. It still seems we should be able to do simple math with those stats and derive whole numbers and not more rounding and approximation.

It's misleading to present such studies as random or evidence of anything. I haven't read it but just the quotes show the parents also testing positive at a high rate so you can't tell me this is a voluntary study where a bunch of random cocaine-using adults all volunteered to be tested with their kids.
Click to expand...
If you didn't read it, why are you criticizing it? Study papers will have a whole methodology section in which they tell you all about the data, the assumptions, the analysis, etc. You can't just go on conclusions without understanding what the conclusions are about.

The abstract was ONE paragraph. It says there were 90 kids who went to the ER in a Mediterranean city (Barcelona). Parent(s) of 85 of the 90 kids also provided hair samples (even druggies will help save their kids' lives sometimes, you know - this is not surprising).

The overlap in parent-kid coke hair was sufficiently significant that the authors recommended using testing as a window or entrance point to other social and health interventions for kids. Iow, testing can yield good potential info to identify kids with a potential variety of negative elements in their lives.

And btw, after the ONE paragraph abstract, you can see right below is another study dated 5 years later in the same city and as slightly larger sample, with about the same results. You'll also see other studies listed that relate to coke and kids there, which perhaps suggests that there is some concentrated effort specifically there to look at this an related topics. In other words, it's not just some random, sloppy bullshit study.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Scout Trooper, Valiantsix, The Motorizer and 13 others
not feeling good kiwibros... this quora site seems to be onto us

1736881223438.png
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Ohoolihan, Scout Trooper, Jang Joo and 34 others
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
If you didn't read it, why are you criticizing it? Study papers will have a whole methodology section in which they tell you all about the data, the assumptions, the analysis, etc. You can't just go on conclusions without understanding what the conclusions are about.

The abstract was ONE paragraph. It says there were 90 kids who went to the ER in a Mediterranean city (Barcelona). Parent(s) of 85 of the 90 kids also provided hair samples (even druggies will help save their kids' lives sometimes, you know - this is not surprising).
Click to expand...
It's not a random sample; the sample is preschool children whose parents opted into a study at a single hospital which means you can't say "1 in 5 children will test positive" based on that study. It's not clear where Nick pulled the stat from but if it's that his assertion is baseless.

Since nearly 90% of the children who tested positive in the study had parents who also tested positive, it seems that they were exposed in the home as well. What I would like to see is the reverse, the probability of the child testing positive given that a parent tested positive, but that doesn't seem to be reported.

Also worth noting that the median test result for positive tests in this study was 1.6 ng/mg for children (range of 0.3-5.96) and 1.0 ng/mg for adults (range of 0.3 to 24.3).

Assuming the units for the "over 5000" test result for Nick's child was pg/mg, that is equivalent to over 5.0 ng/mg,
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: GaryGray, DSP for president 2032, Roboute Guilliman and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back