Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
1000005473.jpg

Even a broke clock is right twice day.

The idea of someone who is in the middle of 2 sex cases moralising over internet sweeping is just bizarre.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tabletoothbrushloofa, The Motorizer, Wicked and 12 others
I'm not sure if these clips of Destiny's views on consent have been posted. These clips are both from a clip of a stream where a caller asks Destiny hypothetical situations where someone's consent could be/could not be violated.

Uploaded May 2nd, 2023

Destiny Scares Lilypichu Away w/ Hard Consent Question\ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Y-HC1vVbA8 / https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/4Y-HC1vVbA8​




In the above clip, the caller offers a hypothetical of candid photos being posted to an anonymous forum where people will inevitably jerk off to them.

Transcription pulled from Youtube and edited for formatting:

Caller: Uh, let's say you're posting candid photos of somebody on an anonymous forum where you know people will jerk off to them?
Destiny: Probably
Caller: Okay, what's the meaningful distinction there?
Destiny: Um, you're taking some of these pictures and you're reposting them which, in and of itself, is already a little bit hairy, and then now you're posting in a place that's explicitly for like, sexual consumption.
Caller: Okay, so, if it -- okay. So if you were reposting them somewhere else just for fun with no sexual intention or like sexual intention ?
Destiny: Yeah, it could still be wrong but it would be a lot different the type of wrongness would be quite a bit different, I think.



In the second clip above the caller poses hypotheticals where if the other party doesn't know or will never know about something done to them if their consent was violated.

Transcription pulled from Youtube and edited for formatting:

Caller: I forget your stance on cheating. Do you think if the other person never figures out if there's actually something wrong with that, or no?
Destiny: Yeah, I guess so, that's kind of the question is could you theoretically do-- Well, because there are some things you could not get caught doing that we'd still consider probably a violation so for instance like peeping on somebody, like binoculars into somebody's window, probably not be good, right?
Caller: Yep
Destiny: Because somebody has a right to privacy. (Addressing chat) Do you have a right to a person sitting across here to not be stealth masturbating? I don't know, I'm not sure, that's a really hard one.
Caller: Well, could you like-- Let's say you could steal something from somebody and you know for a fact that they would never know that it's gone, is that okay?
Destiny: No, that's still that's an easy wrong because you shouldn't be stealing things from people even if they're not aware that they're losing it right stealing one dollar from somebody's immoral even if they don't know they're gonna miss it right but that's an easy one you're taking something from somebody.
----
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Brap God, dick tha master, ztarouk and 4 others
kendoubleyou said:
To be mean. Your posts suck and don't make any sense. I'm not going to make an arguement, just state basic facts that I hope will get through to you.

Destiny engages in purposeful intellectual dishonesty constantly. He's much more concerned with the image of being intellectual than actually being intellectual. This is because destiny is the archetypical egomaniac. His main goal isn't to be the smartest, it's literally world domination. He wants to control everything. He considers himself to be God. He needs influence to get to that position, and in order to acquire that influence he thinks he has to construct a public persona of a godlike genius type.

He isn't even intelligent, he's a master manipulative and is willing to do whatever it takes to get to the top and sit on a throne of skulls. You seem very confused about the guy, hopefully this helps.
Click to expand...
The problem with this (common) position, and the reason why I decided to post in this thread at all, is that by simplifying your criticism of Steven to this surface level analysis you allow him to dismiss all other criticism directed towards him as unilaterally ignorant of how he operates, and thus not worthy of taking into consideration. If you think calling him an egomaniac, narcissist, manipulator, degenerate, con man, wikipedia warrior, or any other standard line of attack, will reach him you are wholly incorrect. Not only that, you are playing right into his handbook. People like you are the very reason why he has become so confident in his own understanding of the world. Steven's life would probably have been very different if he had come into contact with European intellectuals earlier on, the rampant stupidity of most Americans is what allows him to play as the one-eyed king in the land of the blind. The quality of posts seems to have gone severely down since Blav was banned.
 
  • Autistic
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Sneed or Death, The Motorizer, Meelo and 9 others
Code Cave said:
1738623027741.png
Click to expand...
Buddy what? I don't wanna act like I'm pro feminist or whatever, but this is unironically some of the most blatantly misogynistic shit I have ever seen, nigga is literally saying "Destiny might be a pedophile sex criminal, but at least he never supported Trump".

It's just more proof that all these male feminist pro degeneracy types don't actually support women, they just want to get laid without consequences. When the rubber hits the road though and they actually have to stand for what they claim to believe in though, it's basically "The only thing that matters is getting Trump out of office, it doesn't matter if a dude raped a women as long as he's helping the cause, and if you get raped by him and you say anything about it you're actually a bad person".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: The Motorizer, SenseDemons, ztarouk and 5 others
Gabriel Apostate of Hate said:
I disagree. I think that is an apt description of the coomer gremlin himself. Tiny is extremely interested in preserving his image of this logical, moral, and reasonable liberal. As much as its memed on, he DOES want to be the Joe Rogan of the left. That is why he constantly purges wrongthink in his community, to make sure that image is preserved. The only thing that is held higher than that image is cooming.
Click to expand...
one of the most important things in the world to him is his wikipedia page. its the official narrative of his existence and its the one he has the least amount of control over. he has taken great measures to protect it from artifacts of misconduct and its going to absolutely destroy him when his history of sex crimes is finally documented and published.
 
Irregardless said:
Buddy what? I don't wanna act like I'm pro feminist or whatever, but this is unironically some of the most blatantly misogynistic shit I have ever seen, nigga is literally saying "Destiny might be a pedophile sex criminal, but at least he never supported Trump".

It's just more proof that all these male feminist pro degeneracy types don't actually support women, they just want to get laid without consequences. When the rubber hits the road though and they actually have to stand for what they claim to believe in though, it's basically "The only thing that matters is getting Trump out of office, it doesn't matter if a dude raped a women as long as he's helping the cause, and if you get raped by him and you say anything about it you're actually a bad person".
Click to expand...
The whole Trump rally shooting thing completely broke the minds of Destiny, his community, and everyone adjacent to it. Since then no matter what "their side" does or says its ok because the "other side" is worse.
Im convinced that Epstiny could just livestream himself shooting some random person in the face and DGG would still go "Hey, at least he is helping us fight against Trump!" or something like that.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dude Snakes, Guyspleasedontfight, ztarouk and 3 others
deletethis said:
one of the most important things in the world to him is his wikipedia page. its the official narrative of his existence and its the one he has the least amount of control over. he has taken great measures to protect it from artifacts of misconduct and its going to absolutely destroy him when his history of sex crimes is finally documented and published.
Click to expand...
He currently has Dggers deleting the addition to it in the article and demanding more sources in the talk page.

There's like 4-5 sources now so it should be added soon.

Screenshot_20250203_204522_Wikipedia.png
Screenshot_20250203_204434_Wikipedia.png
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gog of Magog, yybish, mrfresh and 2 others
The reason why Destiny (and others braindeads like Erudite) are going apeshit on Hasan and accusing people of sweeping and stuff is because Destiny cant fully control the narrative this time, thats the reason he is deflecting.
I still think the Pxie stuff will go nowhere and they maybe will settle, but for everyone he is a sex pest now.
Everything went downhill after Dan was banned from twitch some months ago lmao.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SkanteWarrior, spacedapple420, mrfresh and 1 other person
  • Like
Reactions: Pocahontas, Hagane, Guyspleasedontfight and 1 other person
HandsomeAndCool said:
Kyla's Twitter banner has become much more fitting in the past few weeks

View attachment 6939184
Click to expand...
Going to make a minor nitpick here, but has she always labeled herself as "Radical Orthodox Protestant"? I recall her supposedly being Christian adjacent, but those three words tied together don't end up creating a meaningful concept; it looks more like it's just trying to evoke some sort of vibe.

Radical: favoring change, altering of the fundamentals
Orthodox: literally 'right belief' in the Greek, but in English carries meaning of conforming to tradition
Protestant: historically meaning protesting against the Catholic Church, now has shades of various denominations that came from the reformers

'Radical' and 'Orthodox' should really cancel each other out. Not having the support of either two adjectives, 'Protestant' is left extremely vague. My only guess is that she wants some D.I.Y. Christianity that allows her to have it her way, and that way being highly compatible with modern liberal sentimentalities -- we're so much more enlightened now after all; unlike those simpletons of the past we know that butt sex and turning your penis inside out are acts that God delights in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hagane and FarmEnjoyer
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: yybish, Guyspleasedontfight, Manat and 3 others
dvorak said:
Going to make a minor nitpick here, but has she always labeled herself as "Radical Orthodox Protestant"? I recall her supposedly being Christian adjacent, but those three words tied together don't end up creating a meaningful concept; it looks more like it's just trying to evoke some sort of vibe.

Radical: favoring change, altering of the fundamentals
Orthodox: literally 'right belief' in the Greek, but in English carries meaning of conforming to tradition
Protestant: historically meaning protesting against the Catholic Church, now has shades of various denominations that came from the reformers

'Radical' and 'Orthodox' should really cancel each other out. Not having the support of either two adjectives, 'Protestant' is left extremely vague. My only guess is that she wants some D.I.Y. Christianity that allows her to have it her way, and that way being highly compatible with modern liberal sentimentalities -- we're so much more enlightened now after all; unlike those simpletons of the past we know that butt sex and turning your penis inside out are acts that God delights in.
Click to expand...
This is exactly what it is, and to prove your point..

She's the one who's argued on stream that flirting with other men besides her husband was perfectly acceptable with her unnamed church. Aka, she made it up.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hagane and dvorak
Am I the only one who feels like this drama won't do anything. The worst that might happen is a charge and some orbiters leave. But I feel like most of his audience won't care and he pretty much only solo streams so it won't matter if people hate him?
 
ijustwannatalklol said:
Am I the only one who feels like this drama won't do anything. The worst that might happen is a charge and some orbiters leave. But I feel like most of his audience won't care and he pretty much only solo streams so it won't matter if people hate him?
Click to expand...
The only audience he has left is a bunch of actual cultists who worship the ground Daddy Steven walks on. His audience won’t grow because no other streamers outside of his bubble will platform him. Nobody is going to start watching Tiny through political streamers outside his bubble because they’ve all cut ties with him, either over politics or because of his insane behavior. And that’s assuming he gets through the lawsuit without much damage. More than likely he will lose some amount of money and be humiliated even more during the process.

On top of that, major political groups will never want to work with him again. This started a while ago, but it’s arguably hit its most logical conclusion. He is a total toxic asset to any brand or person who keeps him around, and he will remain so for the rest of his life.

It’s a similar situation to what just happened to Riketa. He may have won the legal case, but at what cost?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tabletoothbrushloofa, The Motorizer, JDS and 7 others
A Bit Concerning said:
The only audience he has left is a bunch of actual cultists who worship the ground Daddy Steven walks on. His audience won’t grow because no other streamers outside of his bubble will platform him. Nobody is going to start watching Tiny through political streamers outside his bubble because they’ve all cut ties with him, either over politics or because of his insane behavior. And that’s assuming he gets through the lawsuit without much damage. More than likely he will lose some amount of money and be humiliated even more during the process.

On top of that, major political groups will never want to work with him again. This started a while ago, but it’s arguably hit its most logical conclusion. He is a total toxic asset to any brand or person who keeps him around, and he will remain so for the rest of his life.

It’s a similar situation to what just happened to Riketa. He may have won the legal case, but at what cost?
Click to expand...
yea you're probably right. I forgot he wanted to do politics
 
ijustwannatalklol said:
Am I the only one who feels like this drama won't do anything. The worst that might happen is a charge and some orbiters leave. But I feel like most of his audience won't care and he pretty much only solo streams so it won't matter if people hate him?
Click to expand...
I also believe this, maybe some mainstream people will refuse to talk to him (DNC, and some other mainstream figures) but his streams will continue and the cultists acting like he is the only person that can stop Trump (they actually believe that).
This thing will die down UNLESS Melina goes nuclear (will not happen, she is clearly scared because Destiny will leak DMs and other stuff)
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDS, A Bit Concerning and spacedapple420
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back