X-avier cuck
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
I do agree that it's not a traditional remake as we know it today but it does have a lot in common with stuff like Maleficent.I agree that it's definitely partly what started this trend, but the thing setting that movie apart from the disney remakes despite it being framed as the "first one of the live action remakes" by internet review people is it's not a fucking remake. It's literally just like the plot of HOOK where it's framed like a sequel to the original animated adaptation but live action and darker in tone. Literally the same thing of "title character from first movie is now grown up offscreen after initial adventures and has to go back to solve issue in world from original movie." As far as that type of movie goes it was ok but not the best because of how severely redesigned all the characters were compared to the thing it was meant as a sequel to. Kind of a reverse HOOK in that sense because in that Robin Williams looks like a businessman for like the first half while the pirates look like live action versions of the animated counterparts. In the alice tim burton movie alice looks like a mildly grimdarkified version of her original look from the first movie but older while everyone else is cgi or live action guys trying to imitate tim burton's nightmare before christmas-ish style and not the characters from the original.
I'm also sort of thinking about this from the perspective that one of Disney's "lesser" IPS doing so well that it most likely got the executive thinking that if something like Alice in wonderland could do this imagine what the Renaissance films could do?
Then they basically just tripled down on the reimaginings from that point forward after they got done milking Alice and maleficent