Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

[NotClavicular]

Oh well shit, you snipped some random exegesis.

One, as your own post states, it can indeed refer to literal children, and I know this may be hard to believe, but most people, think that raping children is incredibly detrimental to their physical, mental, and in this case, spiritual health. Now you are correct, in that its not literally a verse advocating killing pedophiles. I do not think that any significant group of people reads it that way.

There are plenty of topics in the Bible that are not explicitly addressed, however, its easy to intuit from Jesus' teachings things that are off limits, like vehicular homicide, insider trading, and raping children. There is no mainstream Christian thought that believes you should fuck kids. Now, the counter point I assume you might bring up would be to point to the sex abuse scandals, particularly in the Catholic church, though hardly exclusive. No one defends them raping kids. No one thinks they did the right thing. The only prominent Christian I've heard saying anything pedophillic is Nick Fuentes, the closeted Mexican leader of the white race, who is a retarded fed and has all the rich and deep Christian spirituality of the Amazing Atheist.

And honestly, initially I just rolled my eyes, but then I read this shit. "It's really not that much better than islam".
I honestly think you're just being a spazz, but on the off chance you're actually this retarded, let me break it down for you.

Christians -> I think Jesus is a pretty cool guy. Eh, dies for sin and doesn't afraid of anything. Jesus was a celibate preacher who taught compassion, even against those who would do you harm.

Islam -> Muhammad, who according to the most credible Islamic sources was a murderous pedophile, is the best of all men. His decision to fuck a 9 year old, still leads to jurisprudence in the Islamic world allowing for grown men to marry children. I can even find multiple, incredibly popular Western Muslims who advocate or defend this.

You don't have to believe either, but to pretend they are the same means you are either incredibly ignorant of both, or you are a disingenuous moron.

nowhere in christian scripture is there a defined age of consent or an unambiguous condemnation of sexual relationships with minors. Yes, it’s perfectly obvious to modern western sensibilities that abusing a child is abhorrent.
But let’s not pretend we got that straight from the bible because we didn’t

Historically, christians (like everyone else) married teen girls off to older men. If scripture was so clearly against that, you’d expect some explicit prohibition, but instead, it’s silent
You can project “love thy neighbor” or “don’t harm children” onto it, but that’s you reading modern ethics back into the text. The notion that anyone under 18 is legally untouchable is a 20th century invention. That’s not in the gospels, nor anywhere else in the bible
If christians are so sure pedophilia is scripturally condemned, then show me the verse. Citing “causing a child to stumble” doesn’t magically become “age of consent is 18.” lol

Also, I agree with what you said about Islam, and I do think Islam is worse, but both are pretty bad tbh

 

[Toji Suzuhara]

But let’s not pretend we got that straight from the bible because we didn’t

Thank God that Sola Scriptura is heretical.

Historically, christians (like everyone else) married teen girls off to older men

Stats or it didn't happen, and don't point towards anecdotical evidence. That's an outlier an not the rule

 

[Kiwisee]

Historically, christians (like everyone else) married teen girls off to older men.

Church marriage records actually show that the average age gap between married couples was 2-4 years at most. You didn’t typically see larger age gaps until remarriages, in which widows over 25 were usually marrying men in their late 30s for both security and political reasons.

Teenage girls that were married to older men usually did so for political reasons, and those marriages were rarely consummated because those noblemen weren’t interested in doing children most of the time. Chauncrer’s People is a book that goes into this. It also goes into how expensive drowries are for the family of the brides, which is why the trope of “girl being married off to nobleman to save the farm” isn’t remotely based on reality.

 

[NotClavicular]

Stats or it didn't happen, and don't point towards anecdotical evidence. That's an outlier an not the rule

look at the medieval church’s own canon law the legal minimum for marriage was typically 12 for girls. That’s not some fringe anecdote
So claiming teenage brides in christian europe were “outliers” just isn’t credible
The fact that there were also plenty of marriages with smaller age gaps doesn’t negate the institutional acceptance of marriage at those very young ages

 

[Toji Suzuhara]

look at the medieval church’s own canon law the legal minimum for marriage was typically 12 for girls. That’s not some fringe anecdote
So claiming teenage brides in christian europe were “outliers” just isn’t credible
The fact that there were also plenty of marriages with smaller age gaps doesn’t negate the institutional acceptance of marriage at those very young ages

But was it a common occurrence for 12yo girls to get married? Was it a common occurrence for them to get married to men much older than them? Was it common for them to consumate their marriage (engage in sexual acts) with said men as soon as they got married? All data points to no

 

[Kiwisee]

look at the medieval church’s own canon law the legal minimum for marriage was typically 12 for girls. That’s not some fringe anecdote
So claiming teenage brides in christian europe were “outliers” just isn’t credible
The fact that there were also plenty of marriages with smaller age gaps doesn’t negate the institutional acceptance of marriage at those very young ages

Wrong. I cited a book that debunked your claim, don’t make me pull up the actual records. You’ll look retarded once I do.

Kids getting married wasn’t common outside of nobility. Consummating it wasn’t normal either given how horrified the average person was by how Margaret Beaufort was treated. There’s a reason she was always written as a tragic figure even by Medieval historians of the past.

Most of the time, child brides in the Middle Ages were a thing because of grooms wanting to seize land and resources from the bride’s family. That’s the most common theme; it was in the context of nobility and politics more than it being “normal” so to speak.

Commoners usually married within their own age range. If a 14 year old was getting married, their partner was most likely around 14-17.

Stop getting your historical facts from fantasy books published through the 70s to 90s. Game of Thrones isn’t real life.

 

[NotClavicular]

But was it a common occurrence for 12yo girls to get married? Was it a common occurrence for them to get married to men much older than them? Was it common for them to consumate their marriage (engage in sexual acts) with said men as soon as they got married? All data points to no

Look, the fact that the legal age was 12 already shows it wasn’t treated as some bizarre “one in a million” anomaly. medieval church canon law didn’t materialize out of thin air it codified the social norms of the time. Even if not every girl married at 12, the rule existed because it was common enough to require official regulation. It’s not like they wrote, “Minimum is 12, but nobody actually does this lol”

Also pretending older husbands never had sex with these girls is very optimistic lol. Sure, it might have been delayed in some cases, but there was no blanket rule ensuring they’d wait until she was 18. If a man married a 12 year old, he was legally entitled to consummate
Just Imagine if pedophiles could still do this today

Wrong. I cited a book that debunked your claim, don’t make me pull up the actual records. You’ll look retarded once I do.

And what claim is that exactly?

 

[Kiwisee]

And what claim is that exactly?

You’re making child marriage in that time period sound far more common than it actually was back then.

 

[NotClavicular]

You’re making child marriage in that time period sound far more common than it actually was back then.

lol this reminds me of trannies trying to downplay how frequently minors get HRT and trans surgeries

 

[Core Theorist]

Enough about the horrific past of religion. It's time to talk about the horrific present of weebs and furries.

 

[Space Police]

Christians are overrun with pedos because they can do any bad thing as long as they regret it afterwards and because they want to seem trustworthy and moral so nobody suspects them and they can gain access to children.

Lolicons on the other hand want others to validate their child porn habit. Jacking off to CP isn't enough. They genuinely want to convince people what they're doing is socially acceptable. As you might expect they're going nowhere so here they are, stuck in a groundhog's day loop of circular arguments for all eternity. They will never convince anyone else, which explains why they're so vocal.

Regular pedos want social acceptance too, which is why they turn to lolicon and are so persistent and vocal about it. The Venn diagram between lolicons and pedos consuming photographic CP is a circle.

 

[LavenderMenace]

Oh yeah I found out why Chibi got banned, because the clip is floating around twitter now. Nudity and massive fucking tits in that order lmao. No actual nipple, but VERY horny on main.

Good. Chibi Reviews is such a massive faggot

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Misty has been hit on by older men despite being 10-12. Because it's still a children's show from the '90s, it wouldn't get explicit or graphic and is typically played for laughs, however, the dub would still skirt around it.

Was it supposed to be funny like Brock hitting on women all the time? I think some were even somewhat receptive to it. I never considered anything I saw to be an issue, idk.

Meanwhile I think there's official interviews about the future female companions being designed to be "eye candy" for boys, specifically with Dawn and Serena. Stupid shit like that.

Boys do like girls, seems normal, if it was for men that'd be way different. That term "eye candy" makes it sound kinda creepy but just the notion of including girls that boys will think are cute isn't really that crazy.

The fact that there is no bible verses about the age of consent or pedophiles explains a lot of christian behavior tbh

You're a retarded faggot, America is a Christian nation and one of the few with an age of consent of 18. And Christian behavior is far better than Atheist behavior, which every libtard is, and you're all pedophiles and pedophile enablers.

Christians are overrun with pedos because they can do any bad thing as long as they regret it afterwards

You Atheist pieces of shit always say some variation of this bullshit because you haven't read the Bible, ignorant fuck. That's not how it works.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Good. Chibi Reviews is such a massive faggot

Well he got unmanned because gaylog faggots did it. See the Chibi thread in PG for details.

.... also what the fuck is going on in here?

 

[NotClavicular]

You're a retarded faggot, America is a Christian nation and one of the few with an age of consent of 18. And Christian behavior is far better than Atheist behavior, which every libtard is, and you're all pedophiles and pedophile enablers.

If the US supposed ‘Christian values’ are the reason it currently sets the age of consent around 18 (16 in the majority of states), how do you explain that in the 1800s when the nation was far more overtly Christian the age of consent in many states ranged between 7 and 12?
Delaware, for instance, had an age of consent as low as 7 years old, and numerous other states set it at just 10 or 12 until well into the late 19th century
These laws only started rising under social reform pressure, not because America suddenly became more Christian

 

[quarterpounderwithcheese]

What is up with the religion talk? This is a thread about pedos who defend porn of cartoon kids, not pedos who were in the 1800s

 

[LavenderMenace]

A popular gimmick account on x/twitter, Earth Updates, has made the controversial statement, “All lolicons are pedophiles by definition.” (Archive)

And hooooo boy the roaches weren’t happy with that statement,

This is their profile btw.

Other reactions

The classic stun lock on “It’s a drawing” retort. They literally have zero self awareness of their own actions.





Earth Updates makes another tweet, except there’s a community note that was most likely approved by lolishota fans.

Quote:
This user was previously exposed by CN for posting sexual content depicting fictional minors

Context: A user posted a previous post from Earth Updates about an update of Greg from Diary of a Wimpy Kid is pregnant.


Now…I think it’s clear that this is a joke. Weird joke but it’s not showing sexual exploitation or drawn in the way a lolicon image is. Not a good comeback.

He also admitted he didnt care that adults were talking with minors on his discord server in a sexual matter, before he self corrected (due to his co host expressing disapproval)

Now this one I can’t approve of. While he didn’t engage in any minors on Discord, he did let anyone in his 4 year old Discord group with little moderation. That I can’t let slide. He should’ve shut down the discord when minors weren’t getting banned.
A video has been floating around of him admitting this.

Earth Updates makes another tweet saying he has crashed out the pedos. Now with a community note citing that he was neglectful with discord moderation.

Currently pinned post.


In conclusion, Earth Updates is a retard but he is right that lolisho fans are pedos.

 

[FuluFuckwit]

What is up with the religion talk? This is a thread about pedos who defend porn of cartoon kids, not pedos who were in the 1800s

Two possibilities.
First possibility, the individual that started this retarded conversation is a just a general sperg poster
Second possibility, they're another "Hitler Cunny Rapist" type.
I'm going with the former, in this case, but I'm open to it being the latter.

 

[quarterpounderwithcheese]

Jesus Christ what is that hand

 

[WelperHelper99]

Context: A user posted a previous post from Earth Updates about an update of Greg from Diary of a Wimpy Kid is pregnant.


Now…I think it’s clear that this is a joke. Weird joke but it’s not showing sexual exploitation or drawn in the way a lolicon image is. Not a good comeback

Oh no, someone joked about Greg Heffly from Diary of a Wimpy Kid. Obviously a pedo. NOT. Grasping at straws is a understatement.