Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 29 2.5%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 304 26.6%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 811 70.9%

  • Total voters
    1,144
On the whole Big Government question, I find myself holding the seemingly contradictory positions of wanting to fire as much of the bureaucracy as possible, but also wanting to establish some sort of guaranteed basic income (call it welfare for all, if you will). I think anyone can see 90% of the bureaucracy helps nobody except themselves. I also think anyone can see the job market is increasingly like a game of musical chairs, more and more people are being forced out of the game and are having to resort to more and more desperate measures to make money (e.g., crypto gambling for men, onlyfans for women). I feel like nobody in power wants to deal with the reality that for most young people today, there is really little prospect of securing reliable, decent-paying, long-term employment.
 
On the whole Big Government question, I find myself holding the seemingly contradictory positions of wanting to fire as much of the bureaucracy as possible, but also wanting to establish some sort of guaranteed basic income (call it welfare for all, if you will). I think anyone can see 90% of the bureaucracy helps nobody except themselves. I also think anyone can see the job market is increasingly like a game of musical chairs, more and more people are being forced out of the game and are having to resort to more and more desperate measures to make money (e.g., crypto gambling for men, onlyfans for women). I feel like nobody in power wants to deal with the reality that for most young people today, there is really little prospect of securing reliable, decent-paying, long-term employment.
Then they wonder why are there so many commies around.
 
well what was the reason. i bet when we find out suddenly people will stop humping the CFPB. What's more likely, it was a lazy gov't worker who didn't do a good job, or a regular government worker who followed the orders to a fucking T.
Or, ya know, Elon is just gutting agencies because he wants to pay less in taxes and doesn't care that it sticks it to poor people. Billionaires are not your friend, dipshit
 
bro, kamala's campaign literally spent more than trump's.
don't be like digibro
Is that still true if you count buying twitter as a campaign contribution? Not saying you should, sure in literal terms it's not; and if you do grant it then you could likewise count all the VC money dumped into it over so many unprofitable years the opposite way for previous elections (if you wanted to do this, there's plenty of twitter files shit you could point to to help make the case). But anyway, I think that's the argument; do you want to argue buying twitter wasn't efficacious?
 
Can't a lot of these agencies being abolished have their responsibilities conferred to the state level? I think when things are outside your control ultimately, it's best to be optimistic.
 
I feel like nobody in power wants to deal with the reality that for most young people today, there is really little prospect of securing reliable, decent-paying, long-term employment.
Because solutions would make big donors mad. The richest people in the world right now are primarily technolibertarians who see everyone as ones and zeroes. There is no sense of noblesse oblige, just autism. So they will break whatever laws they see fit and import infinite jeets because nobody wants to stop them as many politicians got very rich from things like Tesla stock. Elon is just autistic enough to be vocal about what he wants. Thats why him chiseling away at things like the CFPB is ultimately a net negative for society. Ownin’ da libs is a fucktarded reason to eliminate consumer protections but millions of people will cheer it on until they need it and then they’ll blame another DEMONKKKRAP boogeyman. Same as it ever was and has generally started ramping up since the 1980s.
 
Can't a lot of these agencies being abolished have their responsibilities conferred to the state level? I think when things are outside your control ultimately, it's best to be optimistic.

Not really. The CFPB is about protecting the consumer federally, USAID is a different story and fuck USAID, the Department of Agriculture exists for a reason, the NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration) handles our nukes, the Fed is all about the national economy which effects the states and federal government) etc.
 
Not really. The CFPB is about protecting the consumer federally, USAID is a different story and fuck USAID, the Department of Agriculture exists for a reason, the NNSA (National Nuclear Security Administration) handles our nukes, the Fed is all about the national economy which effects the states and federal government) etc.
I was more or less wondering whether or not something like the CFPB could exist at a state level? Or at least the laws it enforces? California has something called the 'California Consumer Privacy Act', which isn't the norm in other states, so in theory couldn't something be legislated locally that offers the same protections and assurances the CFPB does but just state wide? I'm not American so I'm more or less just going off of what I know from osmosis and extrapolating.
 
Sometimes you just have to hire The Bobs. We've all seen it, useless people paid because it would be a hassle to find someone else. The only sector of our culture immune to standard corporate downsizing, is the same sector that literally creates money out of thin air.

Elon is the Bobs, he isn't the CEO of Initech.

Go yell at your Congressperson for giving Obama the authority to hack the entire government, because his website was shit, and not repealing that shit.
Did you see Office Space? The Bobs weren’t good at their job.

I was more or less wondering whether or not something like the CFPB could exist at a state level? Or at least the laws it enforces? California has something called the 'California Consumer Privacy Act', which isn't the norm in other states, so in theory couldn't something be legislated locally that offers the same protections and assurances the CFPB does but just state wide? I'm not American so I'm more or less just going off of what I know from osmosis and extrapolating.
Sure the blue states can help themselves. Poor red states however….

But it’s all good. We had to own the libs.
 
I was more or less wondering whether or not something like the CFPB could exist at a state level? Or at least the laws it enforces? California has something called the 'California Consumer Privacy Act', which isn't the norm in other states, so in theory couldn't something be legislated locally that offers the same protections and assurances the CFPB does but just state wide? I'm not American so I'm more or less just going off of what I know from osmosis and extrapolating.

Maybe. But that opens the door to wider corruption on a state level and it also would not be universal.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Automaton Type 2B
Maybe. But that opens the door to wider corruption on a state level and it also would not be universal.
It depends then on whether potential corruption at the federal level is less or more desirable than corruption at state levels I suppose. One could argue at a federal level the laws are stronger and more cohesive, and there's less of an argument and wiggle room to escape punishment for violating laws in one state which are perfectly acceptable in another. Although I recall Josh being rather upset with the CFPB, so maybe it's not as effective at doing its job as it ought to be?

I think, rather optimistically maybe, that the issue of consumer rights and privacy is bipartisan. The source where I discovered where California had a consumer privacy act, also revealed that several states have followed suite - 10 Republican, 11 Democrat. If it falls to the states, it might be slow going, but I think the protections will come eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
re: the CFPB

my policy now towards everything is: if it doesn't directly benefit me, I don't like it and I don't want it. Not protecting my bank accounts? not paying me money? fuck it, smash it. don't give a fuck about the starving africans and i don't give a fuck about muh 2008 and I don't give a fuck about muh economy. Drive the economy into the fucking dirt, cancel all forms of social security, let the olds and browns that can't work starve to death in the fucking streets. I've lived in Ukraine, I see the Babushkas picking through the dumpsters because they don't have family that likes them enough to take care of them. I know what happens without these programs and I support that reality. Economic migrants can eat shit, fuck them. Tax their remittances 50%. We're never going to be free until we're not a fat cow that can sustain a million bloodsucking ticks on our neck. if that means a starvation diet, so be it. federal austerity won't impact me at all. i benefit 0% from the existing government. they have never, ever done anything for me. they won't even go after the criminals trying to attack my family. not a single job is worth saving. all 2 million can go.
qft

He can not not think of fat cows even when holding a flaming speech. <3
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Laughing Putin
That database could have some of the classified shit that they were grabbing from the agencies, too. Jesus christ, what a clusterfuck. Are you MAGA retards starting to regret your vote now?

Sources tell WIRED that the ability of DOGE’s Marko Elez to alter code controlling trillions in federal spending was rescinded days after US Treasury and White House officials said it didn’t exist.
 
Most people going "muh trannies bad" are partially the reason why elon is getting away with this shit, by distracting you and making you believe trannies are the real problem he was able to worm his way with the wool over your eyes.
The enemies of my enemy are not necessary my friend.

@Get the rope Macaulay! has been threadbanned for a week, and @Autism Doesn't Rock has been threadbanned for five days.

Back on topic, is it possible vaginal sex gives Musk sensory overload?
Yeah he will flap his arms like wings and take off like a rocket.
 
That database could have some of the classified shit that they were grabbing from the agencies, too. Jesus christ, what a clusterfuck. Are you MAGA retards starting to regret your vote now?
The website was originally opened in a partially unfinished state in Wordpress. It's more of a quasi-blog than an actual website where team members collaborate and input data, I think? Since it wasn't hosted on government servers it's improbable it stored government data, but it probably did have some details about potential recruits if you can enter details through the 'join' button. I don't know the extent of the information revealed since access is blocked to me, but it probably contained some email addresses and names, unless everyone is blocked then there might've been nothing to share.
 
The website was originally opened in a partially unfinished state in Wordpress. It's more of a quasi-blog than an actual website where team members collaborate and input data, I think? Since it wasn't hosted on government servers it's improbable it stored government data, but it probably did have some details about potential recruits if you can enter details through the 'join' button. I don't know the extent of the information revealed since access is blocked to me, but it probably contained some email addresses and names, unless everyone is blocked then there might've been nothing to share.
I wouldn't put it past Elon and his incel squad to put actual information in that database even if classified. They act like they're above the law
 
Back