Bronze Age Pervert (BAP) / Costin Vlad Alamariu & Associates / BAPists / BAPsphere / Frogtwitter / Greek Statue Twitter / "The Talmudic Network" - An "Ironic" Gay Romanian Jew Who LARPs as Bronze Age Warrior and Posts Topless Male Bodybuilders. Feuding Against Nick Fuentes Over Which One is Gayer. Defends Pederasty. Allegedly Funded by Peter Thiel & Followed by JD Vance. + His Orbiters

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
IMG_0727.jpeg
Yeah just a teenage girl that had %100 consensual sex with a guy old enough to be her father, nothing out of the ordinary here :)

Nothing to see here, he was just a normal Jewish guy who liked to film powerful men sleeping with teenage girls to get favors and money, simple as. Thinking there’s anything more to the story is low IQ conspiracy peasantry.
BAPists have been on a mission since 2023 to frame any and all concerns about Israel as "brown", "low-IQ " and "third worldist". Now it seems like they're trying to do the same with Epstein.
 
The "Epstein's victims were all older teens who knew what they were in for and wanted it" argument had been around for a long time. I heard it years ago from an acquaintance and had to show him the Virginia Guthrie stuff. I think it was the first thing that they floated out to try and cover for him.

Ironically (or not, probably) he's a finance bro, which I think is a place where narratives like that have the most cache.
 
I think this is part of a broader trend to overcorrect against the excesses of “Me Too.” You see it with Harvey Weinstein as well.
Andrew Anglin too was doing this shit, attempting to "correct the record" that "you know, maybe Mr. Weinstein wasn't that bad, all these washed up whores just wanted a campaign to fuck with the man", ignoring the fact that he used them for nefarious purposes.
 
they understand young men, especially in the current age way better than most and that marketing especially if you're a mutt and overweight and autistic like the guys in the photo below are. getting them to associate top tier people with far right wing thought. the same way guys like Nick Rekieta idolizes the man Dax Herrera pretends to be, you have these guys doing the same thing. meanwhile somehow despite literally millions of posts and writing from everyone in this sphere, not a single one seems to have even let it slip out some conquest or just made it up like Tucker Max said he did. Say what you will about Mark Collett everyone knows he's fucked plenty of women. You can't really see that in most of the modern right wing. hell the new thing this month is talking up hipsters and as you see from Martin's dox 1. he was a hipster and 2. he's the type of guy the Chive types would mock and say has never gotten laid.
This is very important. Not just in the specific issue of giving advice to losers who adopt a cliche version of what they want to be. That’s sort of obvious as an overcorrection of the bad advice Millennials got that women like respectful men; it’s only marginally more successful because it will at least prime you to try and sleep with women (so if you’re a moron you think “it works” and keep trying it to ever more diminishing returns). But there’s the broader point of how it exploits informational asymmetry— if you know that the mainstream is wrong you implicitly trust anyone else who also says that. But, of course, you only know the mainstream is wrong because it practiced some transparency while these guys are clear as mud. But, ultimately they’re telling you things that obviously cut against any innately-felt sense of good and bad while pretending you’re brainwashed. The fact it all ends in tears just reaffirms that subversion was all it ever was.
 
When they go so hard into the "individualist barbarian" rhetoric they circle back into becoming "rootless cosmopolitians"
:thinking:
It's almost as if
A barbarian warband is definitively rootless, its just nihilistically breaking down the autochthonous national identity.
I think this is part of a broader trend to overcorrect against the excesses of “Me Too.” You see it with Harvey Weinstein as well.
Thuletide follows accounts that post lolicon stuff, it doesn't need to be any more complicated than that.
 
BAP vociferously doubling down on “Epstein did nothing wrong.”

IMG_0731.jpeg
IMG_0732.jpegIMG_0733.jpeg
IMG_0735.jpeg

I have to say I still have a difficult time reconciling why a homosexual man is so interested in defending being attracted to very young girls. Maybe someone who understands it better can enlighten me on this phenomenon.

Also, if the West is so horrible because of “feminist sexual hysteria,” I’m sure Romania will gladly take you back. I hear this kind of stuff is pretty commonplace over there.
 
Subhuman Redscale podcast outhoe started harassing basil on behalf of Bronze Age pervert
A little more detail (plus archive):
View attachment 7059316
View attachment 7059317
View attachment 7059318
(https://archive.ph/Fy96J)

I was also informed that Red Scare, Anna Khachiyan's podcast, can be viewed in full for free up through November 2023 here: https://kemono.su/patreon/user/10413541
(might be good to include in the OP, @Dick Cheney Respecter?)
This BasilianThought guy is pretty sharp ngl, it makes sense why the BAPists don't like him lmao
Screenshot_20250307_134251_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20250307_134301_Brave.jpg
(https://archive.ph/MIzcs)

BAP vociferously doubling down on “Epstein did nothing wrong.”
Also, here's an archive: https://archive.ph/Bitta
 
Last edited:
....
I have to say I still have a difficult time reconciling why a homosexual man is so interested in defending being attracted to very young girls. Maybe someone who understands it better can enlighten me on this phenomenon.
he knows his audience, loli stuff has been huge in dissident circles for years, Null openly argued that it was perfectly fine before jannying 8chan and finding out it doesn't just stop at cartoon pictures.

Like if you go back a decade ago it was something early far right people were fine with because it was just part of dissident culture in general, same way 1970s punks allowed nazis, it just "came with the territory"
It's funny how if you ever disagree with BAP or his orbiters his followers will immediately call you brown like how a Groyper might immediately call you a jew.
Groypers and BAPists are truly two sides of the same coin.
the difference is because BAP and his ilk were smart enough to not "facefag" and keep behind avatars they aren't as easily mocked or attacked. Null said awhile back he's on the side of the BAP types.
 
Stuff like this isn't just "a trend" that just happens, these people hang around in various GCs/Discords to organize and coordinate talking points.
The same was blatantly obvious when Scott Greer, Andrew Anglin and Greg Johnson were pushing the "Weinstein was a good boi who dindu nuffin" angle (find the common thing between theses three).

Thuletard going "the girls just lied to poor lil Jeffrey, who as a intel connected billionair couldn't just run background checks on the girls employed at his celebrity wank hut" while ignoring victims like the Farmer sisters and how Epstein and Maxwell attempted to intimidate them into silence (a journalist wanted to include their case into an article about Epstein: Maxwell sent them and their employer bullets and the severed head of a cat) sure is telling.
Guess since they never found adolescent female skeletons on the island it was all a political witch hunt going after poor lil Jeffrey and Miss Reddit, eh?
 
Last edited:
BAP vociferously doubling down on “Epstein did nothing wrong.”
Considering BAP and the BAPsphere are hand-in-glove with the "new elites" that have supplanted the oldfags in the heart of the Empire after the Election (captive literally pushed the Haitian thing to the center and James David Bowman ran with it, that's how deep this goes), it is interesting to see a massive full-court press across the BAPsphere in unison to minimize the Epstein Angle. Someone is trying to downplay this whole thing, just in case they missed some files or something more gets leaked.
I have to say I still have a difficult time reconciling why a homosexual man is so interested in defending being attracted to very young girls. Maybe someone who understands it better can enlighten me on this phenomenon.
Because he is surrounded by actual pedophiles who don't think that there is anything wrong with what they're doing, and he is paid and leveraged by pedophiles who were compromised by Epstein and the Mossad operation he worked for and have a vested interest in either maintaining the cover up or, if that fails, shifting the narrative entirely and minimizing it as "no big deal."
 
Back