Plagued Lolicon/Shotacon Defense Force - The people who jerk off to cartoon children and won't ever shut up about it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I don't understand being happy that the federal government is shifting gears on censorship.
Do you understand what "federal government" means? How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?

If we're prosecuting for drawings of rape then the next step is prosecuting for the "massacre simulators" Jack Thompson talked about.
Where does the slippery slope start? By your logic CP being illegal was the slippery slope that led the loli becoming illegal, so we should just go ahead and allow CP too? Where is the line in the sand?
 
If anyone's bored, here's the tweet announcing the passing of Senate Bill 20 in Texas which bans all Ai-Generated child porn, including animation and cartoons. All the replies are just coping and seething about their precious little girl porn now qualifies as criminal on US soil!
View attachment 7092106
The salt is FLOWING


Finally. Took them long enough.
 
Wow, the argument really is just this for over 200 pages.
View attachment 7092744
And because I have to clarify: this isn't me defending shit. This is me thinking your arguments are flimsy; I can agree with someone on something and still think their argument is shit.

faggot.png
are you genuinely this retarded? Nobody thinks it's a real child being harmed. I just think people are fucking retarded for announcing to the world they're jerking off to drawings of children. Note how my usage of the world drawing in the last sentence doesn't make it seem any less repulsive and creepy
 
There's no difference. The slope gets slippery here, it's been argued a million times before. If we're prosecuting for drawings of rape then the next step is prosecuting for the "massacre simulators" Jack Thompson talked about.
The argument for prosecuting the AI art is that it was trained on CP, which taints the image unlike "drawn" versions which I hope to God didn't use references. So, while I agree there are slippery slopes, I think there's merit to saying that AI CP is CP, and since CP is illegal so is it's derivative.
 
The argument for prosecuting the AI art is that it was trained on CP, which taints the image unlike "drawn" versions which I hope to God didn't use references. So, while I agree there are slippery slopes, I think there's merit to saying that AI CP is CP, and since CP is illegal so is it's derivative.
How hard is it to train AI off pictures of naked adult women, then tell it "okay now shrink everything down"? That seems like a very simple task for AI image generators to accomplish. You could also probably just hand it a medical textbook.
 
My favorite is all the ESL and SEAniggers chimping out:
View attachment 7092803
WE'RE GOING TO LOSE TO CHINA IF WE DONT ALLOW LOLICON!
They always talk about unconstitutionality when the first landmark ruling in the US that legalized pornography as protected speech was in 1957 with Roth v. United States by the fucking Warren Court, you know, the most liberal court in recent American history that legalized everything from contraceptives to flag burning to abortion. Did I mention that Samuel Roth was Jewish? Every single time or so I've been told.
 
How hard is it to train AI off pictures of naked adult women, then tell it "okay now shrink everything down"? That seems like a very simple task for AI image generators to accomplish. You could also probably just hand it a medical textbook.
This is not a hill you want to die on
 
View attachment 7092833
are you genuinely this retarded? Nobody thinks it's a real child being harmed. I just think people are fucking retarded for announcing to the world they're jerking off to drawings of children. Note how my usage of the world drawing in the last sentence doesn't make it seem any less repulsive and creepy
Wow, that's a great reason for people to celebrate the government granting itself more power and control over the internet. And yeah, let's just ignore who I was replying to and what they said because straw manning people is easier.
 
This was discussed in the AI Derangement Syndrome thread but the bill bans 'obscene visual material' and due to the 1st Amendment courts have very strict definitions of obscenity. The federal government already has a law that bans 'obscene' loli cartoons:
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children

(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A)depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B)is obscene;

This Texas law will probably only be tacked on to offenders that are being charged with much harsher child exploitation or pornography offenses.
Prosecutors have to argue that any given loli hentai image is obscene and not just free expression under the 1st Amendment, which as far as I know has proven difficult in the cases it has been tried.
 
Back