UN Australia and Canada pull rape and incest game that tells players to be 'women's worst nightmare' - The following story contains reference to sexual assault, violence against women and misogyny.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
L/A
IMG_2944.webp
The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer.". Picture: No Mercy on Steam

By Asher McShane
A game that touts itself as an "incest and non-consensual sex' simulator has been pulled from the world's biggest PC gaming platform in Australia and Canada as pressure mounts on UK authorities to follow suit.

The computer game "No Mercy" centres around a male protagonist who is encouraged to "become every woman's worst nightmare", and "never take no for an answer."

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, who is responsible for overseeing the government's online safety strategy, described the game as "deeply worrying" and demanded the tech giant take it down.

The game launched on Steam last month and is described by its own developers as containing violence, incest, blackmail, and what they describe as "unavoidable non-consensual sex."

After LBC revealed it was still available on Steam in the UK, it emerged that Australian and Canadian officials had swiftly made it unavailable for download.

Officials in Australia pulled it for being ‘unclassified’. A spokesman for Australia’s department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts said: “The computer game, No Mercy, is unclassified and has now been removed from sale from the Steam platform in Australia.”

Efforts to have the game removed in Australia were spearheaded by campaign group Collective Shout who wrote to the country’s regulator as well as launching a global petition.

After a public backlash the game was also removed from Steam in Canada after less than 24 hours.

Pepe Di'Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School of College Leaders told LBC: “Just copy Australia. Australia seems to have got a grip on this, they seem to have acted swiftly.

"They realise they have to protect young people who are at the heart of this… I think that we’ve got a game of tennis taking place between Ofcom and tech companies, what we’re seeing is people blaming one another.

"Let’s get the legislation doing what it should do and let’s make sure we can protect the young people who are most at threat from this right now.”
IMG_2945.webp
The video game has 'very positive' reviews from sick users on Steam. Picture: Steam

The game requires a card to buy, but has minimal age-verification checks, with campaigners warning it could be downloaded by children.

“Adult themes exist in video games, but I’m so shocked and surprised by this,” LBC's tech correspondent Will Guyatt said.

“There's probably about 3.5 million active Steam accounts in the UK… I just don't see how this can be openly, easily available and also importantly not removed when people like myself have reported it as unsuitable.”

LBC created a Steam account with full access to adult content by simply ticking boxes claiming to be 18+, and was able to download No Mercy for £9.99.

“Tech companies make it as easy as possible for kids to go on and put in a fake age and put in a card,” child mental health expert Nova Eden said.

She says many parents will be under the misconception that sites like Steam are “a game shop, a social network,” and therefore assume they are properly moderated.

In reality, Steam is not signed up to any age-rating frameworks like PEGI, a content rating system established to help European consumers make informed decisions when buying video games through the use of approved age recommendations and content descriptors.

Anyone can upload a game for sale on the site, which then sits alongside products developed by regulated, mainstream games studios.

LBC reported the game to Steam as inappropriate five days ago. It has still not been taken down, or subject to more stringent controls.
IMG_2946.webp
The game's presence online also raises questions about the regulator Ofcom’s ability to properly moderate content.

It began its crackdown on harmful online content last month as part of the Government’s Online Safety Act, but the regulator told LBC it “can’t investigate individual complaints.”

That’s despite chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes saying as part of LBC’s Online Safety Day last month: “Our under-18s deserve a very different experience to the one they’re getting now, so no pornography, and a significant down-ranking of things like violent content, misogyny.”

The body is due to publish its “children’s codes” which will set out requirements for sites to protect young people online. Tech firms will then have three months to carry out risk assessments.

“I'm very interested to see how [Steam’s parent-company Valve] will justify that topics like this are acceptable in a game, and if they do deem them acceptable, they should make it a hell of a lot harder for your everyday consumer to be able to find,” Guyatt said.

“It's intriguing to see where this fits under the Online Safety Bill.”

Mr Kyle, who is facing pressure over the potential watering down of the Online Safety Act, insisted that Steam should remove the game from its marketplace.

He told LBC: “We expect every one of those [tech] companies to remove content as soon as they possibly can after being made aware of it. That’s what the law requires, it is what I require as a secretary of state, and it is certainly how we expect platforms who operate and have the privilege of access to British society, and British economy, to do.”

Mr Kyle also suggested that the regulator should make a call on whether the game should remain online.

"Ofcom is the regulator," Mr Kyle said. "They are tasked with enforcing and they will make the judgment as to whether content is removed in an appropriate time."

A spokesperson for the Games Rating Authority said:"Game ratings provide parents and players information about the content of video games.

In the UK, physical game releases must carry a PEGI age rating by law. Digital games are not legally required to carry an age rating, but the majority of leading stores use the trusted PEGI age rating process to provide confidence to consumers.

Although games on Steam can optionally apply for a PEGI age rating via our classification process, it is not mandated by the platform prior to a game's release.

The Games Rating Authority has not classified this game and has not been approach to classify it since its release."

Steam did not respond to LBC's requests for comment.
 
Making a big stink about this retarded piece of goonerware was probably a worse outcome than it simply existing. It probably would have only been picked up by a few degenerate soulless freaks and then disappeared into rancid depths of coomer games on Steam. This is pure Streisand effect, making way more people aware of a shitty VN porno game than there really needed to be. Makes me wonder if the devs are still selling it elsewhere.
It's on itch.io
 
The sexual desires of many men are bad and toxic. I'm not Freud, but it's telling that you chose this thread to protest the perceived vilification of your sexual desires.
You aren't wrong about weird shit being common, but it's why I mentioned the statistic of 62% of women having a rape fantasy earlier. That kinda information kinda only has so many possible reactions the way I see it.

-women are disgusting amoral pieces of shit (Muslim, and passing the buck)
-women are entirely this way due to the fault of men somehow (feminist, and passing the buck)
-humanity is helplessly perverted (blackpilled)
-maybe if it's so damn common on both sides and most men aren't rape machine's and most women aren't insanely self destructive harpies, it's really overblown on BOTH sides in terms of just being an inclination, and we should kinda relax (It's not as big a deal as it seems, it's just people mostly)

And I'm still saying excessive porn consumption is bad, but the freaking out as if only men have those weird thoughts is dumb.

But it's kinda weird that people get hyper offended at men expressing it in any capacity when women have it just as much if not more, and naturally if a man were to satisfy that fantasy of a woman he would need to AT LEAST be ok with it, if not into it too.
 
Making a big stink about this retarded piece of goonerware was probably a worse outcome than it simply existing. It probably would have only been picked up by a few degenerate soulless freaks and then disappeared into rancid depths of coomer games on Steam. This is pure Streisand effect, making way more people aware of a shitty VN porno game than there really needed to be. Makes me wonder if the devs are still selling it elsewhere.
You can find it on multiple websites. The game is not hard to find it just made a huge name for itself and became the "game too edgy and hot for steam!" Where you can play games including things like sucking the devils cock and necrophilia.

Like if you give a fuck about the content of the game being suppressed the buzz around it was objectively bad for that, I saw the clip of the "game" in this thread and that's frankly a strong word. It wouldn't have even gotten far amongst coomers.

And even as much as I don't like coomers, in the words of God's strongest Coke Fiend. "I hope it makes a million dollars" I hope the motherfucker behind it can buy himself an immaculate high tech goon cave which he can strap himself into a VR set and 13 screens so he can be completely incased in gooning and die squirming in his chair of a heart attack from the sheer overload.

Anyone that "campaigned" to get this thing taken off of steam doesn't care about how many people see the game or how much it's contents spread, they care about forcing a giant software platform to make a concession to them to get their rocks off and so they know they can do it again. It almost annoys me that steam didn't even do that and they're still celebrating like they did. The guy just took it off himself. Probably due to threats, and if that's what they're celebrating it would take every last drop of willpower not to go full Mel Gibson at them.

They're no different then keffals or Ralph or big money platforms or faggot organizations like OFCOM or the anti defamation league. They just like flexing their social muscles and getting their way. I absolutely hate them.
 
Porn isn't bad for anyone. That's just stupid shit women push because they don't like men getting off without the aid of a woman. Women like to use sex as a weapon against men. They want to gatekeep the ability for men to get off. Moral fags and prude fags also play a role in this as well. The moral fags and prude fags have joined forces with women to try and keep men from getting access to porn. Porn is just a masturbatory aid. It makes jerking off more fun.

Porn is completely harmless.
Go get castrated before you rape someone
 
most men aren't rape machine's and most women aren't insanely self destructive harpies
You're deboonking a statement here nobody made. You're also ignoring the difference between "fantasies of rape" and "fantasies of being raped", as well as the difference between "4k60FPS porn video industry responsible for untold human suffering" and "smut kindle ebooks written by a fellow woman".

Again, most men aren't rape machines. Nobody said that. But men have a potential for violence and hurt far surpassing that of women, on average, and the porn industry is ripe with soulless ghouls exploiting exactly that.
Human sex trafficking, incestuous rape, stranger danger sexual assault, illegal and immoral porn, exploitation and abuse in professional settings... if you're based and redpilled enough to grasp 13/50, you should also be able to grasp 50/99.9
 
Didn't this same scenario already play out before, like 3-4 years ago? Some guy made a game called Rape Day (or something like that) and then it was taken down, and it was exactly the same sort of generic visual novel.

In that case though, Steam actually removed it from the Steam Store. They actually did something they have never done before or since, they actually deleted the page for the game so it was as if it never existed on Steam. That dev tried just about every storefront in existence and either got rejected or had it pulled. Also, all the payment processors refused to process payments for the game. So, he had nowhere to sell it, and no ability to take payment, so he released it for free, before disappearing off the net altogether.

In the current case the devs pulled it after getting enough hate. Steam did not pull it.

If something like the Rape Day situation ever happens again, it would be a good case for Null's Internet Preservation group to take on since the dev was banned from all payment processors so he couldn't sell something he created even if he wanted to, despite other stuff just as bad or worse being sold without a problem in many places.
 
Last edited:
Could be worse, you might be using, ugh, Origin....
A deluge of pornslop vs being a product of EA. Truly a titanic battle to define our time.
Meh. We've had the same moral panic with Hatred ages ago, Steam and Valve don't have concrete rules for approval and for good reason.
Hatred was a surprisingly fun game in the end despite the fact you could cut yourself and contract tetanus from the edge in the trailer.
 
It's on itch.io
This is the least surprising information I've heard in years.
If the sexes were reversed, these fuckwads would absolutely call it "empowering". Some shit about women reclaiming their sexuality and dismantling the patriarchy.
There's a recent Hulu show based on the true story of a woman dying of cancer who left her husband and kids to have sex with a bunch of strangers before she croaked. Of course, it's being positioned as "empowering."
 
I understand the concerns surrounding this type of media, but to even make this somewhat effective, you'd need to ban and censor a shit ton of other media. You'd need to out right ban porn if you wanted shit like this to not be made.
 
Last edited:
Zerat Games said:
In general, all those who played it are mentally ill and hate their mothers and women in general. That's how it's generally presented, and we completely disagree with this.
Does his mom agree?
Zerat Games said:
During development, we conducted hundreds, if not thousands, of conversations with people who tested the game, and everyone perfectly understood what the game was about and that it was a game. They were normal people.
The male deviant cries "It's normal to be into the idea of raping your mom, don't kink-shame" as he strikes you with his left hand and uses his right hand to fap fap fap to the contents of the latest kinkster fetishist slop incest rape simulator he just created.
Zerat Games said:
If after reading the above, you still believe that such a game should not have been created, then we sincerely apologize to you. At the same time, we would like you to be a bit more open to human fetishes that don't harm anyone, even though they may seem disgusting to you. This is still just a game, and although many people are trying to make it into something more, it remains and will continue to be a game.
In the 1960s and the early 1970s, the male-lead sexual revolution and legalization of pornography set the stage for males to sexually chimp out on a massive scale. 60 years later, rape ape pornographers, men with anime avatars such as lolicons and other male sexual deviants have successfully gaslit much of the public into believing that kink-shaming is real, and that if you're into the idea of raping your female family members, it doesn't say anything about your character.

In another 10-15 years, Steam will have started to allow rape games aimed at pedophiles with the excuse that they want to prevent pedophiles from raping real children, and besides, pedophilia can be a side kink, and in fact, if someone plays a game where the point is to rape children, it doesn't actually say anything about the player, so don't kink-shame and please call them MAPs instead of pedophiles.
 
The people who made the game, the people who play it, and the people who think this type of media is bad but claim they think it still has the RIGHT to exist or some shit, all of you are retarded. Some things should NOT exist nor be engaged with. Total freedom is a dumb idea and should not be respected. Degenerate shit such as rape and incest media should not exist. There is no merit in it and no reason to defend it. If you can't clearly see that then you need to see a doctor, or go to church, or do whatever you need to do to get your head out of your ass.
Eh i'll just pirate it to see how shit it is. It's clearly an edgelord game i want to see what kind of shitty asset flips they have.
Willingly consuming this shit is retarded.
 
Hatred was a surprisingly fun game in the end despite the fact you could cut yourself and contract tetanus from the edge in the trailer.
That game made an old gaming laptop sound like a jet engine. I have no idea why, either. I was able to play more graphically intense games on it that didn't cause that. Probably wasn't very well optimized.
 
The people who made the game, the people who play it, and the people who think this type of media is bad but claim they think it still has the RIGHT to exist or some shit, all of you are retarded. Some things should NOT exist nor be engaged with. Total freedom is a dumb idea and should not be respected. Degenerate shit such as rape and incest media should not exist. There is no merit in it and no reason to defend it. If you can't clearly see that then you need to see a doctor, or go to church, or do whatever you need to do to get your head out of your ass.

Willingly consuming this shit is retarded.


I mostly agree with you but I can understand the frustration of busybody women tut-tutting this game who go home at the end of the day and flick their bean to a book called “Buxom Wench Gets Violently Deflowered By The Mysterious Loner”… Hypocrisy is the worst haha
 
Back