And he is really really salty that the judge did not look for evidence himself.
View attachment 7228190
All across this document he is trying to spin the narrative that the judge has looked at outside sources for supporting evidence and neglected to do so for the "right" evidence, thereby trusting Billy and taking his word, instead of doing his "own research" where it would have been easy to find evidence for what a terrible human being Billy is AND more important that Karl had every reason to believe what he said about the suicide being caused by Billy to be true.
Absolute fucking giga cope. If that will be the basis for an appeal I will laugh my ass off.
Literally accusing the judge of lying.
View attachment 7228202
Newsflash Tranny_Cat, the judge did not accept any of those things as evidence, because none of it has any evidentiary value for the pleading Karl submitted.
None of those sources can qualify that anything Karl said held any substantial truth at any point in time.
He would have had to plead another defense to argue "I had reason to believe it was true".
Karl did in fact present zero evidence that could reasonably prove that the statements he made were the truth.