Just read this brain damage. Who comes up with this shit?

1) You are in a fucking court of law because you accused someone of driving someone into suicide
2) As the party who did the defaming it is YOUR obligation to show good cause for making that statement
3) You have to present the evidence that you had reason to believe what you said was true
What Billy said in some video somewhere at some point in time is entirely irrelevant to the proceedings, other than the fact that Billy literally said "Karl lied".
Ersatz_Cats is literally claiming that Karl restoring the defamatory statement was logical, because Billy made a video saying that Karl was lying, therefore Karl was right and restoring the defamatory statement was the correct thing to do.
This retard is twisting his brain into a fucking pretzel.

This article and the fact that someone wrote this on a blog post that is supposedly trying to seriously dissect this judgement just proves the judge right.
Which is hilarious.

Yes you retard, examples are in the judgement. I can still find your claims and those of other people all over comment sections and in the Discord server.
You talked about it all the fucking time and spread the claim.