Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Swole McPole said:
I've always thought this kind of relationship was very peculiar. Dude, if she's going to betray your friend by cheating on him to have sex with you, why would you think she won't do exactly the same thing to you when somebody else she thinks is better/richer comes along?

And OK, perhaps you might overlook her whorish tendencies for a quick one night stand, but who the fuck would marry or breed with a bitch like that?
Click to expand...
Maddox and Marie had broken up before she and Dax got together. IIRC it was one of Dax's original points against Maddox, why are you so upset over your ex from year(s?) ago? They're both manchildren and unreliable narrators which means we'll never know the exact story of Dax and Maddox's break up. The truth is that even according to Dax he isn't some suave ladies man who stole Marie away even if he tries to frame it differently now.

I'm not a Dax loremaster and will search his thread to sate my curiosity so hopefully we don't anger the jannies.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: beautiful person, Botchy Galoop and Swole McPole
Useful_Mistake said:
I don't recall Greer saying we're guilty of RICO
Click to expand...
He may not have used the term "RICO", but something to the effect of, "worldwide, organized cyberstalking campaign"... Any allegation that a cow's detractors have all gotten together specifically to scheme against them in violation of some imagined law.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve, Pedophobe, Captain Manning and 2 others
RaptInPlastic said:
Reading this case so far, Montegraph said in his stuff that part of Rekieta's defamation is RICO. I thought that was for organized crime. Does this mean Montegraph is saying that Rekieta organized gay ops against him of a criminal nature? Is that correct? I am confused.
Click to expand...
Useful_Mistake said:
Nick Rekieta, according to Montagraph, has inter-state criminal empire for the sole purpose of lynching Niggers, and if Montagraph can only prove this, he somehow wins his defamation lawsuit. No, don't ask how.

Useful_Mistake

Post in thread 'Steve Quest (p/k/a Montagraph) vs. Nicholas Robert Rekieta & Rekieta Law, LLC (2023)'

Oh, btw, something funny. Nick is accused of fucking RICO operations and “commission of hate crimes” in the discovery plan
IMG_0457.jpeg
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
  • Winner
Click to expand...
There's two parts of Monty's lawsuit. The decent part, and the retarded part.

The defamation per se is the decent part. That's cleared every bar thus far. Nick is likely in trouble on that one. And he knows it. The appeal loss led to him having a complete breakdown, which led to Cokestream and his arrest shortly thereafter.

The RICO shit is the retarded part.

I wish Schneider had just pared it down to simple defamation per se without the additional silly flourishes. Nick isn't running a RICO operation. He's not a crime lord. He's just a drunken faggot that talks a lot of bullshit, and happens to have a small cadre of retarded mouth breathers that will do his bidding without question.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: wimzi, Pedophobe, beautiful person and 5 others
Useful_Mistake said:
There is no RICO shit. Montagraph sperged out about RICO in his discovery plans, but never amended his complaint to include it. It literally was just a waste of everyone's time
Click to expand...
That's good then. It would be a dumb move. Just stick to simple defamation per se.
 
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets
Captain Manning said:
I wish Schneider had just pared it down to simple defamation per se without the additional silly flourishes.
Click to expand...
There isn't a RICO count. There are three counts. One is defamation and the other two are negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Those are rarely successful but it's pretty generic to package them with a defamation claim. They cover a lot of the same ground so it doesn't complicate the case.

Meanwhile throwing in a pointless RICO claim is basically driving your case straight into a ditch.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat, often puzzled, Uncle Buck and 3 others
AnOminous said:
There isn't a RICO count. There are three counts. One is defamation and the other two are negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Click to expand...
That's what I was thinking about. I got so involved with Nick's other bullshit, that Monty's case kinda oozed out of my mind.

Yeah, I don't know if he's gonna win IIED. I do think the defamation claim is pretty solid though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill Evans 45
Captain Manning said:
That's what I was thinking about. I got so involved with Nick's other bullshit, that Monty's case kinda oozed out of my mind.

Yeah, I don't know if he's gonna win IIED. I do think the defamation claim is pretty solid though.
Click to expand...
Probably not, and if he won both defamation and IIED (NOBODY wins NIED), they would just be duplicative damages in all likelihood anyway and he couldn't double-dip on them. About the only reason IIED would matter is if he somehow loses on some technicality for defamation but can prove IIED. Or the defamation fizzles and gets very low damages but he can show medical effects of emotional distress.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: often puzzled, Captain Manning, koos koets and 1 other person
sneedem&feedem said:
Marc Randazza proclaims he has been payed $386,282.65 to badly defend his client Nick Rekieta.

View attachment 7334532
Click to expand...

Between the equity he took out of the other house and this crap, Nick has probably lost close to $1,000,000. (Unless that's what the equity loan was for.) It would have been significantly cheaper to have settled with Montagraph.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Pedophobe, Bill Evans 45, Oliver Onions and 6 others
  • Like
Reactions: beautiful person, koos koets, Botchy Galoop and 1 other person
Dixieland Buckaroo said:

Between the equity he took out of the other house and this crap, Nick has probably lost close to $1,000,000. (Unless that's what the equity loan was for.) It would have been significantly cheaper to have settled with Montagraph.
Click to expand...
He can still win, if only he invades Austria! There's bound to be some money there somewhere, and its not even under NATO protection. As soon as he gets another quick million, Montragraph will rue the day he heard the name Nicholas "Cum Guzzler" Rekieta!
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Agree
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat, Pedophobe, Captain Manning and 10 others
Useful_Mistake said:
He can still win, if only he invades Austria! There's bound to be some money there somewhere, and its not even under NATO protection. As soon as he gets another quick million, Montragraph will rue the day he heard the name Nicholas "Cum Guzzler" Rekieta!
Click to expand...
Nick prefers the nickname "Goo Guzzler". As an English major, he appreciated the alliteration. (As well as the salty bitterness.)

I'm still floored this idiot is still moving forward on this case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe, Clem Fandango, koos koets and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back