2025-03-26 - OFCOM: "Advisory Letter: illegal content risk assessments - your duties under the Online Safety Act 2023"

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I can now see the site on clearnet in the UK without that warning page, did Ofcom drop it? What happened?
Trump personally spammed the king's email with nickacado avacado's nudes until he used the royal prerogative to lift the block. I will continue to believe this even in the face of evidence to the contrary.
 
Ofcom is useless anyway when it comes to enforcing the Online Safety Act and I guess Null realised that quite quickly.

The Ofcom reporting page does not accept URLs, images, videos or any form of attachments, and it asks if you've reported the "incident" to the website owner or the police first. If you answer no to both, you'll simply get an automated email telling you to report the "incident" to the owners of the website, even if the website or service has no reporting mechanisms. Their reporting systems are cloud-hosted on Salesforce CRM, so everything you report to them is unprotected and not treated confidentially in the slightest, which explains why you can't provide any proofs at all. Ofcom claims it's for legal reasons they cannot accept actual proofs of anything people claim but in reality is more likely that if their site did accept attachments, images and/or URLs that they'd be flooded with goatse and other legal shock imagery, wrecking their cheap/free cloud tenancy overnight.

If you want to test out just how trash-tier they are, feel free to test it yourself in a fully legal and legitimate way:
  1. Go to your favourite search engine (ideally Google but DuckDuckGo can also find results)
  2. Go find yourself a compromised UK government website ('site:gov.uk girlfriend videos')
  3. Flick through until you legitimately find an "incident" (on page 20'ish you'll start finding things)
  4. I recommend verifying the page or redirect loads in a sandbox with volume muted
  5. Then, go report the fact a deliberately marked as family-safe site is showing BBFC 18+ or unrated sexual content
  6. ???
  7. PROFIT!
Since it's only unlawful (at worst) but not illegal, a police report isn't appropriate when finding unexpected sexual content on such sites. Most of the more obscure UK government sites don't follow their own rules when it comes to having ways to report content, so you'll naturally have to answer no to both relevant questions for their workflow. This is another bureaucracy-only attempt at "protecting children" which in reality does little/nothing except make it harder to provide domestically-operated Internet services.
 
Yeah, white wall is indeed back
>coming here without tor.
NGMI...

Seriously, do yourself a favor and keep yourself out of a UK prison by using the Tor address to come here every time.
I truly don't know where you guys get these ideas from but I'm not actually going to be sent to prison for looking at a website. Nevertheless, don't worry; I habitually use a VPN anyhow.
 
I truly don't know where you guys get these ideas from but I'm not actually going to be sent to prison for looking at a website
Bro you know that retard teens routinely get banged up for downloading PDFs of the popular parody "Anarchists Cookbook" at school right?
It doesn't have to be a "crime" for them to make it illegal.
 
I wonder why britain has such a totalitarian internet.
Because the government has been socialist for about the last 35 years.

the great irony behind this is the english used to be a race that dominates everyone. now look at them.
I blame the West Africa Squadron. If England hadn't sunk so much money into disrupting the slave trade at a crucial moment in history, it could still dominate the world today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back