He is going for the lil’ Davey Hogg build, he gave up his guns so you don’t have to.
View attachment 7379420
This guy might have a twink build but bro makes his own fucking pasta.
That's, an incomprehensible amount of superiority compared to skelly.
Look at this bowl of Satanic goop spawn, look me in the eyes and tell me you'd rather
eat this than ze boogs.
What even is that? It looks like broccoli dumped in white plastermix.
Archive/
Link
He's officially moved on from "I'll put something together to show why the drug tests are wrong" to "I don't care what you think about it".
View attachment 7381993View attachment 7381992
Archive/
Link
View attachment 7382067View attachment 7382066
Total Kiwi Farms victory.
Considering that he sperged at me specifically, I'm going to assume my post made him extremely frustrated and mad, and I correctly predicted literally every single cope argument he could come up with.
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nicho...ally-criminal-nickrekieta.53871/post-20954026
4-5 hours (of my boss' time) well spent.
Suffa, skelly. Suffa.
Can we also address the strawman? Nobody is asking him to prove a negative. Nobody is asking him to prove that "his daughter didn't get cocaine in her system". We're simply after a sound explanation, or at least theory as to why such a result could occur.
Look at it this way: if indeed there's an explanation for this, then it will serve to refine the processes to mitigate miscarriages of justice in the future. That's how science is done, unfortunately mishaps happen all the time, it's how the scientific community handles it that matters.
I'm all for second chances, just because parents do drugs recreationally doesn't mean their kids should be taken away immediately upon the result a single machine spits out. And indeed, this happens all the time. However, I have yet to see a single result that's above 1200 (heavy contamination from the environment), let alone greater than fucking 5000. Even absolute junkies will not intentionally drug their children.
Combined with the fact that this was apparently Nicholas Rugieta's "favourite". She has some medical conditions and she loves to be in the master bedroom with parents, this paints a rather sinister picture.
This demented skelly menace has shown that time and time again, he doesn't deserve a second chance and he knows how the cocaine got into her. The spoon they used to weigh crack thrown in the bedroom then picked up by his daughter to eat yogurt with in her favourite room makes far more sense than some kind of scalp-sweat-glove-metabolic interaction, or sample decontamination causing benzoylecgonine to metabolise inside the petri dish, or whatever the fuck else fantasy woo-woo.
>No, can't answer what affect [sic] it has. Next question?
Are you ESL?
affect or effect
Affect is most commonly used as a verb meaning “to act on or produce a change in someone or something,” as in Even a small adjustment can affect (change) the outcome of the experiment. Effect is most commonly used as a noun meaning “a result or consequence,” as in His words had the intended effect (result). This sense of effect appears in a few common idiomatic phrases, including in effect and take effect.
If the word you’re using is a verb, chances are you want affect. If you want to use a noun, chances are you want effect.
However, affect can also be used as a noun to refer to an emotional response or state, as in She plays the character with an artificially cheerful affect. Even more confusingly, effect can also be a verb meaning “to make happen,” as in We can effect a new and better society through reform. This much less frequently used sense is often used with the word change, as in It is difficult to effect change.
Maybe get a refund on that English literature degree to pay for your piss tests.
He wasn't bullied enough.
