"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I just want to know what Tyler Kolbe sent to Null.
Tyler Kolbe is a schizo that believes I'm behind everything bad in his life right now, and then some, and he recently started a GoFundMe to take his dox off of the farms.
Previously, he did succeed in taking one clip down, one I had posted, because I guess it belongs to him (he says he showed Null the certificate of copyright he got from the Library of Congress), so he's now hoping that one win will get more taken down.
Of note, is the last image in the little montage, which is the email Tyler got back:
1747932243099.webp
He's trying to DMCA goddamn screenshots... But which ones? Because all anyone can post in the thread are screenshots, because he DMCAs video archives.
And just, the wording on the GFM itself:

I am raising funds for a lawsuit against the website Kiwifarms.net also Kiwifarms.st. What originally started as a mere DMCA takedown request has now expanded into a possible precedent setting lawsuit. You see, the state of Illinois has laws against doxxing that recently went into force in 2024. As the site hosts information on me that fits the definition of doxxing under that law and Joshua Connor Moon has ignored my sensible requests for removal of copyrighted material, falsely claiming fair use, it opens the door to both a civil and criminal lawsuit against both him and the site. However, in order to get the ball rolling I need to be able to cover attorney fees for a sensible attorney out of the state of Illinois in order to bring the case into that jurisdiction. I did find a very strong attorney to begin the case and have begun giving him the information and he believes we have a bulletproof case. Once my case is put through it will set a precedent for anyone else wishing to do the same in the state of Illinois or California under a similar law. This case will also force the Farms to reveal the information of the people doing the doxxing forcing them to face both civil and criminal liabilities.
Click to expand...
As you can see from my emails with Josh, he isn't exactly too smart when it comes to the law. I believe this will open the door for other victims to open lawsuits of their own but we need to start somewhere.
Click to expand...
(just to point out, he lives in Michigan, not Illinois)
In the photos you can see, the email from the lawyer I am speaking to. The unhinged email my stalker in the Farms(who has been stalking me for over a year but tries to pin it on me as I am disabled) has sent to my parents and aunt. The false police report my stalker filed under my user name. The email Josh sent back to me after I sent a DMCA takedown request where he shows a clear lack of understanding of fair use and copyright law. This lawsuit originated as a user removed a watermark from a video of mine which is essentially an open and shut case when it comes to something not being fair use as someone wouldn't remove the watermark on a video if they intended to follow fair use. Once the case is started I can post updates here. Any donations or sharing of this fundraiser is greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Attached are screenshots of unhinged emails my stalker from Kiwifarms has sent to loved ones in order to threaten them. The is also a false police report my Kiwifarms stalker filed under my pseudonym in April of 2024 in order to harass another person.
Click to expand...
When he says "my stalker" he means me, and I'm not the one who sent the email, nor did I make the police report.
but dangit Null doesn't understand this disabled man's poor plight, against the evil, touhou-avatar kiwifarmer that keeps laughing at him, and pointing out his sock accounts! And he wants his address off of the internet, now, now, now, NOW!!!
 
  • Feels
  • TMI
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance, Drama Fan, Shaneequa and 1 other person
DavidS877 said:
what vintage are we talking about when referring to Ralph+Nora+Josh?
Click to expand...
I recommend using the Odysee version because Rumble compressed the quality of the stream for some reason.

Sam Losco said:
Get it while it's hot.
Click to expand...
Credit to this guy for the reupload.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Croak & Caw, The Mass Shooter Ron Soye, 3MMA and 1 other person
volatile puar said:
Look, you can enjoy your Dominos, he can enjoy his Pizza Hut, and Null can enjoy his authentic Florida style pizza.
Click to expand...
You misunderstood, I love Pizza Hut's thin crust, best thing they make next to the P'Zone. That's the great part about American pizza, it's not a zero sum game, you can enjoy a spread of flavors and styles across multiple chains and local regions. Just the water supply changes the dough between east coast and west coast pizza. As I've said on MATI, we got levels of pizza. 🍕🇺🇸
 
  • Agree
Reactions: waffle and Shaneequa
Not A Cat Person said:
This is preposterous negro behavior but I've seen the video of her "assaulting" these cops and basically she's in the middle of some chaotic crowd, arms raised to her chest to protect herself, and bumps into them as people grab at her and push her. It's hardly what I would consider assault.
Click to expand...
What is legally allowed to be considered assault is a lot further reaching than most people would assume. For specifics:

18 U.S. Code § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees​
(a)In General.—Whoever—
(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or

(2) forcibly assaults or intimidates any person who formerly served as a person designated in section 1114 on account of the performance of official duties during such person’s term of service,
shall, where the acts in violation of this section constitute only simple assault, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and where such acts involve physical contact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

(b)Enhanced Penalty.—
Whoever, in the commission of any acts described in subsection (a), uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (including a weapon intended to cause death or danger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective component) or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.


It is pretty clear that the negroid is both interfering with and hindering them, intentionally pushing up against them, and at times, unintentionally or not, she even elbows at least one of them. As impenetrable as a lot of the law is, knowing the law is always preferable to assuming it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KateHikes14, Day Walker and name68126988
WhoDaresWhoCaresWhoKnows said:
It is pretty clear that the negroid is both interfering with and hindering them, intentionally pushing up against them, and at times, unintentionally or not, she even elbows at least one of them.
Click to expand...
Interfering with and hindering them from what? She was one of the ones who was specifically allowed to be there and observe the facility. That's why she got pulled through the gate, not forced away from it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: I'm a Silly
Null said:
I tried the stuffed crust and it's really good but it's an obscene amount of food. It's like 2600 for a medium.
Click to expand...
Cents or calories? In my area, it wasn't that high but I could believe it in a bughive city.
 
Not A Cat Person said:
Interfering with and hindering them from what? She was one of the ones who was specifically allowed to be there and observe the facility. That's why she got pulled through the gate, not forced away from it.
Click to expand...
Using the video you linked let us go through it:
At 00:25 she clearly shoves an officer in the back with one arm.
At 00:29 she shoves the same officer, again in the back.
At 00:36 she elbows another officer in the back, first with her left arm and then her right, and then pushes him away.
At 00:40 she clearly resists being pushed away. (Even if the was legally supposed to be let in there and allowed there, that is still resisting and has to be fought in court.)
At 00:42 she intentionally pushes into another guy, (maybe personal security?) and appears to be grabbing the same officer she previously resisted.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Irrational Exuberance and I'm a Silly
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back