Those retards listening to Nick need to go back to special ed. It's clear the photos are doctored just from the thumbnail previews since they have different sizes:
View attachment 7446988
For example, notice the top cropping is different on the first two images:
View attachment 7446995
Looking closely they all seem to be subtly different, implying manual cropping. This also likely means the EXIF data is complete bullshit since:
- Original images from a phone would have the EXIF data but would all be the same resolution.
- Cropped images from a video, using some snip tool. Then we would not have EXIF data from the phone since it's a different image.
- He used a program to crop the images that preserves the EXIF data. This is possible, but leaves the question of why he needed to crop them and wait a full day to show that he had EXIF data on all but the one image (That had the wrong size listed due to the ratio).
I still think there was likely some sort of marking or timestamp on the images that would have revealed they weren't from the same day, so he's had to go crop them out and redo the metadata to match the few true pictures he mixed in.
Edit: After a bit more digging it is harder to tell on the other images due to the blur and dark edges, but some are definitely different. For another example, the widths of the 2nd image and the 5th one in the 3rd row are clearly different:
View attachment 7447157