Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 37 31.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 39 32.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 13 10.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 29 24.4%

  • Total voters
    119
Nick is really, really trying to copy Dax Herara Juju the Cow, a man who gets fucked in the ass, with the whole “I am going to use personal litigation for content” bullshit.

How many people has he threatened to sue in the last few days? The County? Mama K? Josh? Aaron? Aaron again? Aaron a third time? He has to realize he looks deranged and nothing good will come out of litigation. We aren’t on Aaron’s side, Aaron is just not on his. It’s funny watching Steel Toe get unironic wins and gossip about Nick. It pisses Nick off because he likely watches Steel Toe while trial streaming and gets pissed.

Nick, I know you are reading your thread. You aren’t Juju, if you go after Aaron again you will be Maddox. Not even Maddox in current year where he’s recovered a bit of his reputation, but the Maddox after losing the lawsuit. You will literally be called a cuckhold by the court legally.
Does juju even talk to him anymore? His show seems pretty much forgotten or its likely so boring it doesnt get clipped anymore. Seems like it would explain why nick hangs out with the pedophiles more nowadays.
 
because the sweetheart 1 KNU deal enticed Aaron into a straight plea, all essential elements of both the offense and the cause of action are deemed admitted, to the point of not even needing Geanu to testify anymore.
From a practical standpoint Aaron would ultimately lose because his plea deal is admissible but he's still allowed to contest the legal elements of the case and get discovery etc. Nick may not need to do anything more than present the plea deal as evidence but Aaron is allowed to present a massive range of evidence and witnesses, texts, depose the Rekieta's etc.
 
The only stroke of luck to hope for is that when Nick goes to Celeste begging her to fund this debacle, he fails to convince her that Aaron has any non-exempt assets and she concludes that a judgment for attorney fees wouldn't be a worthwhile investment. Is there even an easy way to garnish PayPal, Venmo, Superchats, Rumble Rants? Let's hit that goal!
I’d like to think no one in their right mind would spring for this but somehow it feels like fate dictates it must. The train wreck must continue

I guess we’ll just have to wait and see what exactly goes wrong next
 
Every time I think he can't spiral and impotently try to strike at random targets any harder, he goes and does it.

Obviously he's mad because Aaron substantiated the bodycam accounts and Aaron claims to be continuing to field calls from investigators.

But doesn't Kayla have to bring this action against Aaron? Won't she have to be deposed? Isn't she going to have difficulty substantiating the narrative Nick has been pushing, that she was unwittingly and non-consensually photographed?

He must know people would donate thousands to a GSG campaign to fight the lawsuit... or is he really delusional about all of this?

Actually, yeah. Do it, Nick.
Honestly, it just reads as him threatening Aaron with no teeth behind it. He has the lawsuit with Montegraph (go donate to his fundraiser) and is threatening his county with lawsuits. I’m no Cleveland, Ohio area attorney like @Potentially Criminal , but this just reads like impotent rage.

One lawsuit is a pain in the ass. Two or three simultaneously while having 5 kids would be mind numbing even with all the airduster you can inhale. I think he’s hoping Aaron gets scared and stops talking about him.
 
One lawsuit is a pain in the ass. Two or three simultaneously while having 5 kids would be mind numbing even with all the airduster you can inhale. I think he’s hoping Aaron gets scared and stops talking about him.
Well it is nick. He loves pain in his ass by nerds named Aaron.
 
Man on probation makes death threats.
Nigga can’t even own a musket, the only reason he’s implying violence and not calling her a pedophile is because she’s a woman.
And yes, he is implying violence. This is how abusers like Nick work, they use specific words and more importantly don’t use certain words for plausible deniability. When a woman, any woman, has a known abusive man approach her outside and bring up past trauma just them two, he is showing that he is perfectly fine causing at least one type of harm to her. And when that same man says he will find that same woman, it doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to figure out the implications.
Now, he would deny this, he does enjoy gaslighting, but just use this as a little bit of education about what abusive people look like.
 
Nick "doesn't know " about his subscriber numbers. He is now at 417k, which is a loss of 63k since late 2022. He's losing another 1k every ten days. The only reason he hasn't lost more is that most people are checked out.
Archive
2025-06-04T06:51:41,869053329+02:00.webp

Only Nick knows what words mean.
Archive
2025-06-04T06:56:45,940546517+02:00.webp

"Bad decisions occured"
Archive
2025-06-04T07:00:25,237273014+02:00.webp2025-06-04T07:00:49,021854756+02:00.webp

He never promised fidelity
Archive
2025-06-04T07:06:16,258333958+02:00.webp

No abuse charges coming from April.
Archive
2025-06-04T07:11:10,888018886+02:00.webp

Aaron's girlfriend is running the show. He's whipped, unlike the guy still pining for his coke whore. Women desire Nick.
Archive
2025-06-04T07:17:24,903970180+02:00.webp2025-06-04T07:17:34,959854583+02:00.webp

Monty 2: Electric Boogaloo incoming:
He'll start all these new lawsuits the moment he wraps up the 5k gift.

2025-06-04T07:23:31,649031757+02:00.webp
 
Last edited:
Reneging on my previous post, it's theoretically possible to sue for intentional misrepresentation, but Null's Angels' misrepresentations must be so severe and clearly malicious that the hurdle to beat their first amendment rights is exceptionally high. Nick would have to prove their commentaries were intentionally false with preconceived malice.
The best way to prove that K's statements are "malicious misrepresentations" would be to present the body cam video as evidence, either in court or on his stream, and he's never going to do that.
All of Nick's talk about legal action is just that - talk.
His talk about suing the county is a transparent attempt to frustrate Hardin's legal action, and I predict it will be DENIED like his Franks motion.
 
Can someone explain why he's become so fucking twitchy? Is this what the stimulate addiction does? Even during interviews, his eyes are darting back and forth like he's got something to do.
I think it's long term substance and stimulant abuse in combination with the fact that he's now constantly having to think of new lies, match those new lies with old ones, contemplate the cost benefit analysis of lying vs telling the truth on a minute to minute basis during his streams which creates an extra "shifty" looking body language.
 
Nick really seems to be spiraling fast

Is it the withdrawal? The addies? The galaxy gas? Nick keeps getting worse.
I think his daily routine is a toxic cycle of waking up God knows when, taking substances, and spending all day everyday online, where he is constantly reminded what a reprehensible piece of trash he is. I don't think he can cope with being reminded of the heinous things he did to his family, his kids and the surrounding community.
 
He never promised fidelity
Here you go Nick, straight from your Lord and God, in the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus was more concerned about your intentions than stupid semantic games.

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.

“It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’ But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.​

Now, I wasn't a guest at the Rackets' wedding, but unless the Scandanavian Incel Prudes are doing marriage in some real weird type of way, I'm going to bet that the ceremony involved oaths of fidelity to each other before the respective families and God. Vows that I'm almost certain that Nick has dishonored, thoroughly.

"Whom, then, was he trying to deceive when he made it? God? That was really very unwise. Himself? That was not very much wiser. The bride, or bridegroom, or the in-laws? That was treacherous. Most often, I think, the couple (or one of them) hoped to deceive the public. They wanted the respectability that is attached to marriage without intending to pay the price. If people do not believe in permanent marriage, it is perhaps better that they should live together unmarried than that they should make vows they do not mean to keep. It is true that by living together without marriage they will be guilty (in Christian eyes) of fornication. But one fault is not mended by adding another; unchastity is not improved by adding perjury".

— C.S. Lewis
 
Back