Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 35 31.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 37 32.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 13 11.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 27 23.9%

  • Total voters
    113
I had a Catholic wedding and in Catholic weddings you don’t do personal vows you make up it’s just a formula. I went back and looked and there actually isn’t a specific vow of fidelity or not to commit adultery.

Almost as if it’s just an understood and accepted part of the concept of marriage in 2000+ years of Western cultural tradition.
It is the equivalent of arguing abusing your spouse isn’t breaking a vow since you didn’t technically state that specifically in the vow. One would think to love and to hold includes not committing adultery by default. Just pure cope.
 
Looking forward to Nick listlessly failing to push a box around his room while his skeleton tries to escape from his skin. Should be good.
Actually, while he still has the eating disorder, he doesn't have the willpower to stop himself stuffing that food in his mouth so he's FAT now. Why do you think he's calling everyone fat? Same as how he calls everyone a pedophile...
 
Here you go Nick, straight from your Lord and God, in the Sermon on the Mount. Jesus was more concerned about your intentions than stupid semantic games.
Yeah but what does jesus know, he was just a dude - Nick (probably)


Nick estimates he could get $420,000 ($210,000 per person that viewed the footage) plus economic damages from the state for the bodycam viewings:
Lol. LMAO even. Please Nick, I legit want you to sue. I want to hear you explain how allowing women to see, and accurately report on, footage of your disgusting crackshack damages your reputation.
 
Nick estimates he could get $420,000 ($210,000 per person that viewed the footage) plus economic damages from the state for the bodycam viewings
No Nick, you can't and you won't. You can't get money out of concerned citizens who legally viewed bodycam footage that the state allowed them to. If he actually goes through with trying to sue the state over this shit the conspiracy might end then and there and they'll hang him out to dry.

He's just a blustering faggot at this point, even his parents must be sick of him and have told him they're not proactively going to fund any lawsuits for him.
 
Whatever his particular vows said or didn't say, what Nick is saying now is that his marriage to Kayla has been an open marriage since their wedding day. That he at least never saw anything in being married to her that precluded him from having as much sex as he wanted with whomever he wanted at any time,

Nick can play legalese with the specific vows and specific words in them. He is an open marriage swinger cuck who lets his wife have sex with other men. Nothing he uses in terms of arguing about the nature of his marriage changes that.
 
No Nick, you can't and you won't. You can't get money out of concerned citizens who legally viewed bodycam footage that the state allowed them to. If he actually goes through with trying to sue the state over this shit the conspiracy might end then and there and they'll hang him out to dry.
Nick is considering suing the state for classifying it as evidence, allowing it to be viewed x times. He isn't talking about suing the viewers.
 
NO KIWI STALKERS, MY CRACK SHACK WAS CLEAN, JUST BECAUSE EVERYONE WHO HAS EVER SEEN MY CRACK SHACK SAID IT WAS DIRTY, THAT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING. MY KIDS LOVED LIVING IN MY CRACK SHACK. YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME BECAUSE YOU'RE MENTALLY ILL

Eats Dorito
"It's not a crack house, it's a crack home" (can't remember whose joke this originally was).
 
That supertips thing is fucking gay. That being said I like how it's bitten Nick in the ass multiple times. He wanted to be like MAPton so much that he still hasn't figured out that it's a magnet for trolls.
Nick can see their identities thanks to Supertips’ Stripe integration. Any trolls should be fully aware of that. Nick has zero shame or qualms about releasing the MAPs on anyone he doesn’t like, just like he’s trying to do with Mama K now.
 
Lol. LMAO even. Please Nick, I legit want you to sue. I want to hear you explain how allowing women to see, and accurately report on, footage of your disgusting crackshack damages your reputation.
According to Rekieta it’s only defamation if it’s not true, so he would have to prove it’s not true by releasing the bodycam footage.
 
Can any of the people who viewed the bodycam confirm whether there were two couches facing each other in any room of Nick's house?
@Tiki Bar Man 2 saw it. And hey if the balldoguards are to be believed Timid Tiger (@AQuietTime) on twitter is K who also saw it (turns out I was already following that account, myself).
 
Nick is considering suing the state for classifying it as evidence, allowing it to be viewed x times. He isn't talking about suing the viewers.
Didn't he already threaten to sue momma k though, or am I thinking of something else? Guess it doesn't matter, I don't think the state is gonna let him get away with suing them over this shit anyway. They'll learn quick why you shouldn't carry water for a retarded cokehead.
 
According to Rekieta it’s only defamation if it’s not true, so he would have to prove it’s not true by releasing the bodycam footage.
Nick's been an insufferably smug, vindictive cunt for his entire online career

He was just allowed to get away with it because he was going after approved targets

This "I'm not a blackface lawyer, I never practiced law in blackface! That's defamation! I'll sue you if you don't come on my show and give me views!" is the exact janus speech bullshit sociopathy he does today and this was close to a decade ago!

He's definitely gotten more unhinged recently, though
 
Last edited:
I hope he does sue. That state or county or whoever. I hope he sues other people.
It would be really funny. What would he do, hire a lawyer? Can he afford it? Represent himself?
Regardless of what happens it would be funny. Hope he does it. I hope he starts a bunch of lawsuits
 
Back