Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who would win in a fight?

  • Ethan Klein

    Votes: 291 3.9%
  • Sam Hyde

    Votes: 7,172 96.1%

  • Total voters
    7,463
doubt this has any major impact on copyright law either. Fair use is always going to be determined on a case by case
I'm doing a happening watch party for sony meme case(we can turn off your internet)(null case issue) unless supreme does it early.(should be Tuesday the 30th)
*There will be effect *
Question is how bad.
Ethan taken early & easy money that record & gaming parley with twitch.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: PrincessHomura
We may see Taylor Lorenz's retarded ass be dragged into this too :story:
Oh yeah, she's diving right in there.
taylor vs ethan 1.webp (ghostarchive)
Taylor Lorenz said:
Ethan Klein knows I have a psychotic and dangerous stalker who continues to endanger my physical safety. My stalker is heavily involved in Ethan's reddit community (something I flagged to Ethan). And now Ethan has posted messages naming my stalker to his stories. This is sick
I'm going to log off & try to reach the detective on my stalking case now. Ethan if you're reading this, STOP. What you're doing is so incredibly harmful and is endangering my safety. You know this and I said this to you. This is not a joke, this man has threatened me physically
This came up in my Google alerts. I have no problem w Ethan sharing our convo. But he intentionally refused to censor my stalker’s name, knowingly endangering my safety. When he was informed of how dangerous this was he STILL refused to take it down. Ethan is a piece of shit
Ethan sits in his multi million dollar mansion all day long harassing and abusing women online. He is a deeply selfish and vile individual and I regret ever giving him the benefit of the doubt. He doxxes and attacks and smears women and sics his deranged fandom on us.
I spent hours dealing with the fallout from him emboldening this man who has stalked and terrorized me for years. Ethan does not care, he relishes in making women suffer and furthering misogynistic abuse campaigns. He is scum

>I'm going to log off
doubt.webp
 
Kaceytron trying to gaslight, gatekeep, girlboss her way out of a lawsuit is a bold strategy.
Looking forward to her crawling back to the hole she calls her streaming rig and crybullying her way into money from the dozens that watch her.

I hope ethan goes scorched earth and takes everything she has left along with the rest of the useless whores involved.
 
I updated the lawsuit thread and found that interestingly, Ethan and his lawyer have chosen to sue Kaceytron in Missouri, presumably because that is where she's located and they don't want to bother trying to long-arm her into California.
You have to sue where the infringement took place, which is typically where the infringer lives.

Denims and Frogan live in LA.
 
Last edited:
California’s anti-SLAPP law can apply to copyright lawsuits, but only when the lawsuit targets protected speech or petitioning activity related to a public issue, such as fair use in criticism or commentary. Courts evaluate whether the claim is a disguised attempt to chill free speech and whether the plaintiff has a probability of success. If the copyright use is non-expressive, commercial, or clearly infringing, anti-SLAPP is less likely to apply. For a definitive assessment, consult a lawyer familiar with California’s anti-SLAPP statute and copyright law, as outcomes depend heavily on case specifics.
Anti-SLAPP can't apply.

CA law has no bearing on a Federal cause of action.
 
Local retard take regarding Anti-Slapp (too retarded to quote)

California’s anti-SLAPP law can apply to copyright lawsuits, but only when the lawsuit targets protected speech or petitioning activity related to a public issue, such as fair use in criticism or commentary.

Since the 3 mentioned didn't provide substantial commentary and then admitted to diverting funds from the source/creating a market place replacement it wouldn't be covered vs someone making a video saying that movie sucks.


I assume this is heavily backed by hollywood especially to prevent bootleg/reselling but like I said I'm just a simple retard.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Terrifik and Style
Anti-SLAPP can't apply.

CA law has no bearing on a Federal cause of action.
To be more precise, the 9th Circuit allows anti-SLAPPs in diversity jurisdiction cases, but this is a federal question case.

Even if the 8th allowed them, Missouri's is extremely narrow and only applies to public meetings.
 
Back