Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Soapmore]

Walton Goggins as Lord Balldo,


View attachment 7567874

I don't want Goggins being typecast. He's already played one ghoul we don't need him to play another.

 

[Unimaginative Username]

I think he's a bit of a sociopath

Talk about an understatement.

 

[Nana_Feeder]

If Aaron has two brain cells to rub together, I hope he's brought up the entire alleged hacking event in his application. That would be the most clear cut example of harassment which would be difficult to counterargue.

Again, even if it was completely fake as Nick claims, it's intentionally distressing no matter it's validity.

How has that not factored into this at all?

Was the hacking the basis for the accusation that Aaron was breaking the restraining order through Kiki?

 

[AnOminous]

Alternatively, it could be that the ex parte HRO indeed prohibits even public mentions like those in Nick's tweets tonight, but Nick simply got it into his head that the HRO being unconstitutionally broad means he is somehow free to violate it prior to getting it vacated, which would yield very funny results.

I like how when I mentioned the possibility of Aaron doing something like this, people acted like I was crazy for thinking so, and what do you know, he applies for it and instantly gets it. (Could be overturned but Balldo apparently has a wild hair up his ass and thinks the response to getting a TRO is screaming "FUCK YOU DAD" and ignoring it.)

I don't think it's possible for Goggins to make himself as ugly as the least fucked up Qover arc Nick looked

That mug shot is the single perfect piece of media from this whole affair. Everything about it is in place.

Nick's petulant, faggy scowl, the enormously BLACKED wife-beater shirt, his sulking posture, his air of defeat and sullen rage, it's just so like that crying Lucifer painting by Cabanel, I mean other than Nick being a weak, faggy skeleton instead of a muscular fallen angel.

To be fair to @Vibralldo, Aaron Imholte getting a restraining order against Aaron Imholte preventing Aaron Imholte from talking about the life of Aaron Imholte would be the best possible thing for Aaron Imholte to do right now. Aaron Imholte would have been in a lot less trouble if Aaron Imholte did that about 13 months ago.

Aaron having his arms cuffed behind his back and a ball gag installed, both with a two year timer on them, would be the best thing for him. I don't see it happening though.

 

[Nana_Feeder]

Even putting out a bounty for others to find information on Aaron is dangerous for Nick. Minnesota's harassment statutes are broad as fuck.

§609.748 "...or repeated incidents of intrusive or unwanted acts, words, or gestures that have a substantial adverse effect or are intended to have a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of another, regardless of the relationship between the actor and the intended target;"

Offering a call to arms and a bounty by the respondent to gather a group of individuals to comb through an applicant's social media, even for the defensive purposes of evidence gathering, can be interpreted as distressing to the applicant, substantially affecting his sense of security.

This is a case where Minnesota's lauded privacy laws that Nick croons about so much in the bodycam footage availability, now returns to fuck him hard in the ass.

If Aaron has made a proper application which can stick. Nick is shit out of luck for a long time and will have to tiptoe to avoid breaking his parole.

It sure would be a shame if someone snitched on Nick about any of his post-HRO private scheming.

Would violating the restraining order constitute violating his parole?

 

[RaptInPlastic]

Would violating the restraining order constitute violating his parole?

Rekieta is not on parole he is on probation. Violation of a restraining order is a crime, conviction of a crime violates his probation. No idea if charges would violate it because the charges might be bullshit. But if Rekieta is convicted of violating the Imholte restraining order he is popped for probation violation. Back of the car, into the cells. Maybe failasota is different.

 

[AncientPhosphur]

Watching MATI I couldn’t help but notice Null made multiple defamatory statements about Rekieta living in a shithole drug den. I mean Nick is currently in a lolsuit happy mode and last thing I want to see is Null face a lawsuit for saying Rekieta lives in a shithole so I hope Null never constantly repeats how Rekieta lives in a crackden. That would be terrible.

Spoiler

What if we get the bodycam footage this way. Keep going Null

 

[AnOminous]

Nick has the right to a full hearing on the merits and contest it. Sadly next week is only a 4 day week so he might not get in for a hearing until the week after.

Well, obviously this means he should just ignore it. It's unkonstimushional n sheeeeit. That dumb judge has no idea what he's doing and that means Balldo should run his mouth about Aaron every waking moment. He should up that bounty, too. What is he, a Jew? A mere $1,000?

He also should definitely put up a bounty for someone to go beat up Aaron.

I'm tired of hearing about Aaron's goo anyways.

The entire Internet is entitled to a global ban on Balldo ever mentioning all the gay sex he had with Aaron at any point in the future.

 

[WebFelching]

Would violating the restraining order constitute violating his parole?

I'd like to / need to hear from @Potentially Criminal on this (Sean if you already answered then I'm sorry I'm just a retard not a fancy lawyer like yourself)

As previous posters have said I think it SHOULD violate his parole in a just world but we're not talking about a just world here we're discussing crooked little Minnesota.

He also should definitely put up a bounty for someone to go beat up Aaron.

He would first need a bounty on someone making sure Aaron doesn't have the holy baseball bat of Quival protection.

 

[AnOminous]

Melton kicks Nick out @ 21:45 @Captain Manning

Fun fact: if you're aware of a restraining order and you act in concert with its recipient to violate it, you yourself are also in violation of it.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Fun fact: if you're aware of a restraining order and you act in concert with its recipient to violate it, you yourself are also in violation of it.

Is there a statute in Minnesota in relation to this?

 

[AnOminous]

Is there a statute in Minnesota in relation to this?

Usually you have to be actually served with an RO to be subject to it on an "acting in concert" basis. There's definitely a statute for that. But not many people are willing to fire up a stream, make it abundantly clear that they're entirely aware of a restraining order and they've invited the target of it onto a public stage to violate it. I'd be surprised if there's an actual statute for such a gargantuan act of stupidity that is in obvious contempt of court.

By admitting that he has a team of people time-stamping and submitting everything Aaron does online it opens Aaron up to have the same. There's plenty of people who hate Nick enough to make this happen.

I would ordinarily call this gay and unrealistic, and it definitely is but these dumb Minnesota fucks deserve to be constantly spammed by idiots reporting every dumb fucking thing Nick says. Congratulations you goddamn morons, this is what you get for rewarding a petulant child-dosing cokehead fuck for his deranged obsession.

 

[sneedem&feedem]

Shouldn't his parole officer care that immediately after getting an HRO against him, Nick starts offering to pay people for clips of Aaron and saying he'll still talk about him? It doesn't seem like the behavior of someone trying to recover from drug abuse and be a good citizen.

His PO should've cared that he went to Vegas unsupervised or a biker bar called Stoney's unsupervised. Given that nothing happened then or when Nick has obviously been huffing gas on stream, I'm gonna assume that his PO is a fat, lazy sack of shit like the rest of Minnesota's so called legal system.

 

[AnOminous]

Silencing the victim or her family? el oh el

That ain't happening in a million years.....unless the judge wants to lose her next election

Appointed to fill a vacancy in 2022. But what does "Elected in 2024. Current term expires Jan. 2031." mean to you?

I'm going to have to question this. Do you seriously think anyone is going to give a shit about this in 2031?

 

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

His PO should've cared that he went to Vegas unsupervised or a biker bar called Stoney's unsupervised. Given that nothing happened then or when Nick has obviously been huffing gas on stream, I'm gonna assume that his PO is a fat, lazy sack of shit like the rest of Minnesota's so called legal system.

Call me optimistic but I think either this one does it (if it leads to a conviction), or they're waiting until August for his scheduled jail time, as that's more convenient for them and requires less actual work.

 

[WebFelching]

Is there a statute in Minnesota in relation to this?

Sure!
609.748.


Again! I am not a lawyer but from what I can tell from doing a bit of reading is that the statute specifically says "A person" to specify that these charges can be brought not only against the named recipient of the order but rather to anyone who violates the order with the knowledge of its existence (like Mapton). I do defer to Sean though he can set us straight either way.

 

[AnOminous]

Then an HRO gets issued, skelly freaks out, cries about it and immediately breaks it in less than 12 hours. Will Minnesota care? Probably not. They don't even care about children being subjected to drugs, alcohol, and freak sex shit.

Remember, this HRO is not from Candyass Yoshi County. It's from Stearns. However unhappy I am with Stearns as well, they appear to be somewhat less comatose in enforcing the law.

Again! I am not a lawyer but from what I can tell from doing a bit of reading is that the statute specifically says "A person" to specify that these charges can be brought not only against the named recipient of the order but rather to anyone who violates the order with the knowledge of its existence (like Mapton). I do defer to Sean though he can set us straight either way.

That's the general statute, but usually any prosecution is preceded by some formal process of actually serving the violator with the injunction, because even if you're a third unnamed party subject on an "acting in concert" basis to some kind of restraining order, you are entitled to due process and actually having been served with it.

It doesn't really countenance the bizarre situation where you have an absolute moron barge into the situation and publicly announce "hey there's this guy who's been served with a restraining order to STFU about this other guy, so I've invited him on my show so he can violate it for my amusement!"

 

[Nana_Feeder]

Rekieta is not on parole he is on probation.

Fuck me. Yeah that was my mistake

 

[Butwhythough2]

Wouldn't Nick getting his law license back to file a civil suit against Aaron by representing Kayla be a conflict of interest? Maybe Kayla wants the civil suit, but everyone knows that Nick would be doing this for himself mostly.

 

[WebFelching]

I did find this tasty little morsel while reading the Minnesota statutes.

Normally the violation wouldn't be greater than a gross misdemeanor, however, one of the ways to upgrade this violation to a felony is to violate the order while impersonating another person.
Little Nickie had better stop playing around in Kayla's account before he gets his constitutional rights really nuked from orbit by picking up a fresh felony.