Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 45 26.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 56 32.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 18 10.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 50 29.4%

  • Total voters
    170
I'm OK with Aaron going to jail on the condition that Nick and all the balldowashers do just as much, if not more time.
It's a pity that Aaron's and Nick's cases are being tried in different counties.
It would've been funny for the two of them to end up as cellmates.
Minnesota has no concerns about any legal senses because it is de facto an islamic dictatorship.
I thought Tim Walz was a CCP asset?
 
I think it was just levity in the fact we don't have any clue who is representation is, to the point that it could be Sean and have no idea.
I know I want it to be Hardin, coming in with the People's Elbow to fuck with Nick once again, but I don't think he actually could (though it would be really fucking funny). I don't think Sean will touch this shit, for obvious reasons.
In regards to the feds investigating balldo: the feds are notoriously slow until everything happens at once. They also try to get shit right, its why they have a 90% conviction rate. Nobody is Waco'ing or Ruby Ridging the balldo bunker, just give it time. I know its hard because this thread is fast, but sometimes the greatest keks are the ones that stew the longest.
The feds work on their timetable, not on ours, unfortunately.
Nick only attacks people when he has a distinct advantage, that’s why he terrorizes women or choke-slams his own feeble drug addicted children, in lieu of any standing personal army request.
I'd like to remind people of how he tried to take glee in Elissa posting about how she might have pancreatic cancer, until his chat viciously shit on him for sounding like a fucking monster, so he tried to feebly backtrack on it. And then days later he ended up doubling down on sounding like a massive cunt. I'd have more respect for him if he just maintained his stance that he doesn't like Elissa and he didn't care if she died, instead of trying to act like a beaten dog because he can't stand when his chat revolts when he's acting like a piece of shit. Granted, I don't have any respect for him at all, so more respect isn't a high bar, and I'd still think him dying in a ditch would be appropriate.

The wrong Minnesota man got canceraids.
 
Omg, how is his comments about Aaron’s google account not enough to bury him???
Because nothing good ever happens. The Evil always get away with it, because Good people aren't willing to DEHUMANIZE THEMSELVES AND FACE TO BLOODSHED.
Sometimes the bad guys win in real life.
And that's why We Fucking Hate Lawyers. No other profession turns you into an absolute fucking Kike except working in Finance.
 
If rekeita and Kayla still bang since the polycule (unlikely, sounds like it's a loveless marriage now) Nick is probably getting at least a few molecules of Aaron's leftover dick fluids on him or in his mouth every time, even if they kiss since Aaron did Kayla raw in every hole. meanwhile aaron has a new woman without the stain of the balldo.

Oh and in case they want to have another kid to try and save their marriage this is something worth considering:

7436777.webp
 
Oh and in case they want to have another kid to try and save their marriage this is something worth considering:
I don't buy that bullshit in the least. Sounds like a bunch of cucks trying to justify their brown children as being the result of PREVIOUS sexual relations of their blacked mates instead of the black dude having been the bull who actually did impregnate them while the cucks thought they were married to her.
 
I bet she knows she's one of three primary people who can consent to its release.
I have a question for the people in here more familiar with American law, but is it literally only people that were part of the legal proceedings that can consent to the release of the footage, not people who appeared in the footage? So it wouldn't be possible for one of the kids that were there to consent to it's release if they came of age in the next couple of years before Skellys probation is over and were feeling bitter about the whole thing?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Potentially Cat Mom
I have a question for the people in here more familiar with American law, but is it literally only people that were part of the legal proceedings that can consent to the release of the footage, not people who appeared in the footage? So it wouldn't be possible for one of the kids that were there to consent to it's release if they came of age in the next couple of years before Skellys probation is over and were feeling bitter about the whole thing?
His son almost certainly could once he was 18, but everyone needs to let that kid decide shit on his own.

I think he should join the military to get physical and financial distance from his family, but I'm not going to like send him an E-Mail about it.
 

CAMELCAST 101 | XIA LAND | REKIETA LAW, Gamestop, Flood Death Top 100, & More

1751946824419.webp1751947988575.webp
Summary:
- Turned the conversation immediately to himself wrt how he started drinking after the CPS case was over
- He had "meat on the grill for the family" and left the stream minutes after the show started. He said later it was pork loin that he cut to be thick chops.
- Seemed very antsy and uncomfortable
- Said he used drugs to cure depression but refuses to use food to help it now; he won't get fat. They then joked about this pic that Camelot pulled up:
1751948948728.webp
- Joked about cross dressing with Cody (didn't sound totally like a joke)
- Discussed a tweet from Destiny citing the Nord VPN trademark and if there could be a lawsuit. (That's ridiculous; why anyone was discussing it was silly.)
- Left stream again
- Didn't know that over 100 people have died in Houston today, his hometown, from flooding and then mansplained that it's due to the gulf (duh)
- Said that Harris County TX, where he's from, has the most tornadoes in the US (it's Weld County, Co actually, but whatever)
- Joked that if a tornado hit his home in MN, he'd have his kids go to his office and he'd go onto his roof to die
- Left stream for the third time
- Political blather about how politicians should self-delete, lack of gov't accountability, and Trump's new tipping law
- Departed the stream by telling Cody to get naked and for Xia to get into a bikini

(Btw, there were only about 300 live viewers there. Cody! What's happening?)
 
Last edited:
I have a question for the people in here more familiar with American law, but is it literally only people that were part of the legal proceedings that can consent to the release of the footage, not people who appeared in the footage?
No, this is some Minnesota bullshit. They have some of the weirdest and dumbest laws about this particular issue than any other state. Minnesota is openly corrupt and stupid beyond belief.
 
I have a question for the people in here more familiar with American law, but is it literally only people that were part of the legal proceedings that can consent to the release of the footage, not people who appeared in the footage? So it wouldn't be possible for one of the kids that were there to consent to it's release if they came of age in the next couple of years before Skellys probation is over and were feeling bitter about the whole thing?
If I’m reading the statute correctly, once they turn 18, they continue to qualify as the data subject and can formally request public release under § 13.825(2)(b)(2).
 
I have a question for the people in here more familiar with American law, but is it literally only people that were part of the legal proceedings that can consent to the release of the footage, not people who appeared in the footage?
What AnOminous said, but also it's helpful to know that body cam footage is regulated by each state, not federally.

A few states - Florida, New Mexico, and Ohio - have versions of "Sunshine" laws which is why 90% of body cam vids on YT come from these states. MN allows access for body cams in which LEO are involved with a shooting. In short, each state has it's own statutes. Most states make it pretty cumbersome (expense, waiting period, easy objections) to get access, however, this is changing somewhat rapidly (for law, anyway). The public is demanding more transparency.
 
Last edited:
Link? AFAICS the only thing even close was one time on Saturday and one time a few months back where he consistently only acknowledged the fact that the mere passive ability to access the account that sat there lying dormant, by virtue of Aaron having foisted that access onto him by having logged in and not having logged out. This was coupled with an explicit denial of having ever actually "used" that passive access by actively clicking on Aaron's account so as to view anything at all. Or to put it another way, his usual wannabe-lawyer pilpul acknowledges only the non-crime of "access" as a noun but denies the crime that it would have been to "access" as a verb. Where is the clip of him admitting to the latter?
He posted a screenshot of Internet history. Aaron confirmed it was his history. Nick confirms he had access. Arguing if it's passive or not falls apart if there is something else showing it's accessed. Some mysterious benefactor sending it isn't going to fly to a jury, especially when Nick is unable to produce this mysterious benefactor. It's the reasonable doubt game again. Reasonable doubt doesn't get applied to every piece of evidence, the jury gets to do it based on everything presented, but it's not even like the individual pieces are merely circumstantial.

Sure, they will get it all in a nice pretty format directly from Google, showing timestamps and IPs. I'd be willing to bet money Nick wasn't even using a VPN, but even if he was they cooperate with law enforcement daily. The device Aaron used there will be the same one Nick then used, otherwise Aaron would have needed to ignore an alert for a login from an unknown device. The nature of it being a streaming setup also lends to no VPN.

By Nick's own admission he was drinking between November and April. One evening he got a little too drunk and spilled his guts, after people here laughed and said he had nothing. He fucked up.

Then the cope of thinking that because Aaron left himself logged in, no crime happened. Note he referenced hacking and a smug belief that once Aaron told the cops how it happened there would be no consequences.

I'd say the minimum he is looking at is an unauthorised access charge at the state level. At the worst the Feds were able to document who he shared with and what. They work slow, even if they then hand it back to the state. Nick won't find out until the charges drop.

The timeline isn't surprising.
 
- Said he used drugs to cure depression but refuses to use food to help it now; he won't get fat.
Sound decision. He may look like a homeless meth user, but at least he's emaciated.

7602698-f9706377257964f963784a2ebcafffd0.webp

No sir, I don't have ten dollars for you. I can buy you some food if... yeah, no, he's leaving.
 
Back