- Joined
- Jan 16, 2024
I don't think Communist is the fitting term. I would call it Neo-liberal Cultural Marxism. The troons working for Linux are praising Corporations a lot, since they are well fed with Pride and Propaganda. They are also very materialistic and consumerist despite their praise of Socialism.I think it's a combination of various things. I also don't think it was libertarians but mostly techno anarchists which can be pushed in various directions politically.
For one thing the companies that funded linux desktop development changed. RedHat is now full of H-1Bs for example. Canonical completely abandonned the desktop.
The the young desktop developer groups themselves are sometimes full of Europeans and typically big city Europeans which tend to be just communist. This can also be applied to various young American devs that live in big cities.
Another factor is the money. There is effectively no money to be made in the Linux desktop right now. And every attempt to make money is met with shrieking retard commies that claim it's no longer free software.
The smart libertarian ex linux users are now on Twitter promoting their new software that they sell. Or they made their own smaller Linux companies.
We completely ignored the fact that 10 to 15 years ago all the new devs coming into linux were a bunch of liberals and commies were actively indoctrinating them.
Corporations( Possibly the Feds) got inspired by the Communists to subvert the opposition COINTELPRO style.
For example Lula. Lula was a fan of Fidel Castro and a huge Marxist supporter in 20th century.
Now in present he actually contradicts the many things Marxists preached. He is corporate friendly, he is close to Western Elites and enforces Copyright laws made by US.
The communists remained subversive, but corrected the flaws of classical Marxism to be corporate friendly.
Last edited: