US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She has to look like she'll be nice to you, bear some good looking kids, and feed them well (with her boobs.) You know, like that Sydney Sweeny chick.
you have omitted a very important factor and revealed your hand while also deciding where the thread needs to go, your a multi talent

Quick question for the class, whats the very first peice of human made ANYTHING we have? And What is it? A spoon? a knife perhaps?

Nope.

1753897249940.webp

Ladies and Gentlemen for your viewing pleasure I present the 30,000 year old "Willendorf Venus" the oldest human relic we have.

Its so great to learn we have ALWAYS been gooners as a species, its hard to overstate how funny it is that this
1. exixts
2. was somthing proto humans devoted time to making
3. was the only thing they made sturdy enough to survive

Anyway we learned alot from this belive it or not and the other statues like it, The big tits to feed children was only one factor, think about the brutal condistions of pre history, lets say there is an exceptionally cold winter where its not safe to leave the cave to go forage, a bigger woman with large fat reserves can contine to stay alive AND provide sustiance (milk) to young children unable to fend for themselves much longer than a skinny woman could, it became pure "odds" of survival not trying to breed the most "desirable traits" and we got Pavloved into enjoying them over time and because God loves us he made those "desirable traits" super freaking cool.

All that to say, my anaconda dont want none unless you got buns hun.
 
you have omitted a very important factor and revealed your hand while also deciding where the thread needs to go, your a multi talent

Quick question for the class, whats the very first peice of human made ANYTHING we have? And What is it? A spoon? a knife perhaps?

Nope.

View attachment 7713678

Ladies and Gentlemen for your viewing pleasure I present the 30,000 year old "Willendorf Venus" the oldest human relic we have.

Its so great to learn we have ALWAYS been gooners as a species, its hard to overstate how funny it is that this
1. exixts
2. was somthing proto humans devoted time to making
3. was the only thing they made sturdy enough to survive

Anyway we learned alot from this belive it or not and the other statues like it, The big tits to feed children was only one factor, think about the brutal condistions of pre history, lets say there is an exceptionally cold winter where its not safe to leave the cave to go forage, a bigger woman with large fat reserves can contine to stay alive AND provide sustiance (milk) to young children unable to fend for themselves much longer than a skinny woman could, it became pure "odds" of survival not trying to breed the most "desirable traits" and we got Pavloved into enjoying them over time and because God loves us he made those "desirable traits" super freaking cool.

All that to say, my anaconda dont want none unless you got buns hun.
Goddess of fertility.

The concept which the modern Western women despise.
 
So this is what we like to call a false equivalence. A caterpillar becoming a butterfly is part of its life cycle it is an entirely biological metamorphosis it undergoes. A caterpillar does NOT need outside help in order to become a butterfly. Troons on the other hand do, a caterpillar does not go to the forest doctor to undergo a surgery to become a butterfly”woman”, troons do. A caterpillar does not “realize it was born in the wrong body” it just becomes a butterfly when it hits that part of its life cycle. And once again under 1k comments over 15k likes and all the comments are roasting them.
IMG_1385.webp
Transgenderism is just a religion at this point.
 
I like the hypothesis that this was a self portrait by a woman, explains the proportions and the obesity
If it was a self portrait, that woman must have been the queen/chieftess of her cave tribe in order to have accumulated enough nutrition to have become obese in that manner. More likely it is an idealized archetype of the most fertile a woman can be.
 

Accepting input on this blog entry before I shill it.
You might need to include a forward / abstract or even a sharable Infographic at the beginning that lays out in big bullets exactly what you want changed about the bill with the article itself below. Something people can copy and paste / share more easily.

There are some minor grammar issues and there were a few instances where I'd suggest rewording, but overall informative.

Fair Access to Banking​

"Give me control over a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its laws."
Attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Financial services have gone on a tear and purged hundreds of mature video games across multiple platforms.
Missing word
More people than ever now recognize the imminent danger that these unaccountable multi-billion dollar corporations pose to our freedoms. Lawmakers in the Senate have proposed the Fair Access to Banking Act (S.401). It is a step in the right direction, not a silver bullet - but it could be.

You may review the text of the bill on Congress's website.

The Gordian Knot of Financial Services​

By design, understanding how a credit card transaction works is very hard.
Very is a lazy modifier, consider swapping "hard" for "difficult" or very for something more colorful.
There are many layers of abstraction, up to six different companies between each card swipe and the seller receiving money. Each of these steps between you and your seller is a bottleneck and single point of failure.

These are:

  • The Issuing Bank, your bank who issued you your debit or credit card.
  • The Payment Gateway, which captures your card information at the point of sale.
  • The Payment Processor, which receives data, processes the request, and does fraud checks.
Consider rewording to "checks for fraud", this sound too much like "does a fraudulent check" which could confuse a Congressman.

  • The Payment Facilitator (PayFac), which maintains relationships with the Acquiring Banks on behalf of many merchants.
  • The Acquiring Bank, responsible for underwriting merchants and settling transactions.
  • The Card Network, which is the network that connects the Issuing Bank to the Acquiring Bank, such as Visa or Mastercard, and also sets rules and standards.
Each of these companies maintains its own terms of service and each of them can block a transaction by themselves. Additionally, intermedairy companies that handle card transactions are mutually and individually bound to the terms of every Card Network, so even if you never do business with Discover or American Express, you must still obey their rules if you want to accept Visa or Mastercard. You don't get to choose what card networks you patrionize: if you want to do e-commerce, you will obey all of them.

If When you are banned from processing payments, you will not be informed why or by which point of failure. "Risk management" is considered a trade secret in the industry. You have no right to know, you cannot sue to discover what has happened, and you also have no right to appeal. These are private companies and they can do whatever they want, even if it is not in the best interest of their customers.
Sell it as something that WILL happen, if leaves room for someone to unconsciously continue to think debanking couldn't happen to them.

What the​

The bill sets rules for a variety of financial institutions (banks and credit unions) and financial services (card networks and their partners). It is designed to prevent them from blocking access to their services based on "political or reputational risk considerations." Theoretically, all legal businesses should be protected.

Financial services have blocked businesses for a myriad of political reasons. Example
s include abortion clinics, gun stores, fossil fuel industries, and even some charities. The bill aims to prevent this by ensuring that financial institutions cannot discriminate against businesses based on their political or reputational risk.
This doesn't flow well, consider rewording.

Banks and Credit Unions are the most heavily impacted. In particular, any FDIC members and NCUA members found to be in violation of the law would be banned from accessing important services, such as the Automated clearing house (ACH) network, which is used for electronic funds transfers. This would effectively cut them off from the ability to process transactions. This is a very strong incentive to comply with the law.
Missing word "a"

What the act​

The law lacks teeth for financial services: the payment networks and payment processors. Financial institutions (banks and credit unions) are not the issue. There are over 9000 such institutions accredited by the FDIC and NCUA. If you are kicked out by your bank, it is fairly easy to find another. Brick and mortar banks have healthy competition, and banks like Old Glory Bank have been started recently specifically to provide banking services to risky businesses.

Lets focus on payment networks. Section 5 states:

SEC. 5. Payment card network.

(a) Definition.—In this section, the term “payment card network” has the meaning given the term in section 921(c) of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 1693o–2(c)).

(b) Prohibition.—No payment card network, including a subsidiary of a payment card network, may, directly or through any agent, processor, or licensed member of the network, by contract, requirement, condition, penalty, or otherwise, prohibit or inhibit the ability of any person who is in compliance with the law, including section 8 of this Act, to obtain access to services or products of the payment card network because of political or reputational risk considerations.

(c) Civil penalty.—Any payment card network that violates subsection (b) shall be assessed a civil penalty by the Comptroller of the Currency of not more than 10 percent of the value of the services or products described in that subsection, not to exceed $10,000 per violation.
Pay special attention to (c). The penalty for violating this law is extremely weak and actually unenforceable.

  • Card networks are only on the hook for 10% of the damages they cause.
  • The penalty is capped at $10,000 per violation. Visa alone processed $16 trillion in 2024.
  • The penalty is imposed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, at their discretion. They are not required to impose a penalty, and they are not required to impose the maximum penalty.
  • In 2024, the Supreme Court in SEC v. Jarkesy ruled that Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are unconstitutional, so the OCC cannot use ALJs to impose penalties. They must go through the courts, which is a lengthy and expensive process. Unless it is politically expedient for them, the OCC would never consider pursuing a case against a card network.

What the act​

The issue of payments is by its nature financial. To make the economic penalties effective enough to deter censorious behavior, there must be relief avaailable to those impacted by the actions of the card networks and their partners.
"Available" mispelled

For instance, the Bill should:

  • provide civil relief to injured parties, allowing them to sue in federal court without permission from a regulatory body,
  • provide punitive damages on top of the full value of the services or products denied, and
  • provide for attorney's fees and costs to the injured party should they prevail in court.
These would significantly shift the balance of power away from the card networks and their partners and back towards the legal businesses that they serve. They would be heavily incentivized to work with their customers, provide human support, transparent appeals processes, and other ways to resolve disputes out of court. That is what Americans deserve.
 
If it was a self portrait, that woman must have been the queen/chieftess of her cave tribe in order to have accumulated enough nutrition to have become obese in that manner. More likely it is an idealized archetype of the most fertile a woman can be.
Its from the pov of a woman looking down at her own body
 
The mediocre neoliberals infesting the Ivory Tower oppose one principle of normality above all others: merit. So their aggressive support for DEI comes as no surprise:
1753898164381.webp
A group of faculty at the University of Alabama formed a chapter of the American Association of University Professors in response to statewide efforts to curtail Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in education.

University of Alabama Professor Sara McDaniel helped organize the new chapter. …

Parallel to her new role as chapter president, McDaniel is also a plaintiff in an ongoing lawsuit against the state of Alabama’s law, SB 129, which prohibits DEI in public institutions, as reported by The Crimson White.

That McDaniel is a plaintiff suggests she has been victimized by limitations on DEI. This might offer insight into how she got her cushy job as a professor.

McDaniel told The Crimson White that students attend universities to benefit from DEI, stating: “People come to institutions of higher education to gain knowledge and hear different perspectives. That’s the point.”

You don’t have to be a U of A student to learn from the crazy-eyed Professor McDaniel. Who knew that students go into decades of debt to pass through shitlib echo chambers not for the sake of liberal establishment indoctrination but to “hear different perspectives”?
1753898239094.webp
 
I like the hypothesis that this was a self portrait by a woman, explains the proportions and the obesity
you really buy the first recorded example of work was from a woman?

Pre humans were kinda weird man they had this weird obseesion all over the place of almost "spray painting" their hands on the walls of caves, and we arent talking like 2 feet into a nice open cave mouth im talking somthing you need modern spelunking tools and professionals to reach with multiple areas of extreme difficulty to traverse, steep drops and areas that seem impassiable without adding in grommets to the walls.

So they somehow got super deep in these caves for their own reasons WITH a light source, thats important, cause it would be pitch black otherwise and did this shit

1753898346438.webp

but it gets even weirder, the pictures of this next part are less previlent but they exist, a handful are missing fingers/fingertips
1753898413245.webp
I know its fairly easy to assume that you could just lose a digit or 2 from unlucky or perhaps even ritualistic reasons but it appears to be far more interesting then that
1753898476454.webp
Its damn close to a Boolean system if you assign IF & And commands to some of them and use the rest to represent 1 and 0s and you have a crude binary system of communication that transcends language, fuck, it might even transcend species intellect divides.
 
you really buy the first recorded example of work was from a woman?

Pre humans were kinda weird man they had this weird obseesion all over the place of almost "spray painting" their hands on the walls of caves, and we arent talking like 2 feet into a nice open cave mouth im talking somthing you need modern spelunking tools and professionals to reach with multiple areas of extreme difficulty to traverse, steep drops and areas that seem impassiable without adding in grommets to the walls.
You've probably seen it, but Cave of Forgotten Dreams by Herzog's a great documentary on these things.
 
you have omitted a very important factor and revealed your hand while also deciding where the thread needs to go, your a multi talent

Quick question for the class, whats the very first peice of human made ANYTHING we have? And What is it? A spoon? a knife perhaps?

Nope.

View attachment 7713678

Ladies and Gentlemen for your viewing pleasure I present the 30,000 year old "Willendorf Venus" the oldest human relic we have.

Its so great to learn we have ALWAYS been gooners as a species, its hard to overstate how funny it is that this
1. exixts
2. was somthing proto humans devoted time to making
3. was the only thing they made sturdy enough to survive

Anyway we learned alot from this belive it or not and the other statues like it, The big tits to feed children was only one factor, think about the brutal condistions of pre history, lets say there is an exceptionally cold winter where its not safe to leave the cave to go forage, a bigger woman with large fat reserves can contine to stay alive AND provide sustiance (milk) to young children unable to fend for themselves much longer than a skinny woman could, it became pure "odds" of survival not trying to breed the most "desirable traits" and we got Pavloved into enjoying them over time and because God loves us he made those "desirable traits" super freaking cool.

All that to say, my anaconda dont want none unless you got buns hun.
we are a very silly species
 
you have omitted a very important factor and revealed your hand while also deciding where the thread needs to go, your a multi talent

Quick question for the class, whats the very first peice of human made ANYTHING we have? And What is it? A spoon? a knife perhaps?

Nope.

View attachment 7713678

Ladies and Gentlemen for your viewing pleasure I present the 30,000 year old "Willendorf Venus" the oldest human relic we have.

Its so great to learn we have ALWAYS been gooners as a species, its hard to overstate how funny it is that this
1. exixts
2. was somthing proto humans devoted time to making
3. was the only thing they made sturdy enough to survive

Anyway we learned alot from this belive it or not and the other statues like it, The big tits to feed children was only one factor, think about the brutal condistions of pre history, lets say there is an exceptionally cold winter where its not safe to leave the cave to go forage, a bigger woman with large fat reserves can contine to stay alive AND provide sustiance (milk) to young children unable to fend for themselves much longer than a skinny woman could, it became pure "odds" of survival not trying to breed the most "desirable traits" and we got Pavloved into enjoying them over time and because God loves us he made those "desirable traits" super freaking cool.

All that to say, my anaconda dont want none unless you got buns hun.
Humans have always been Nullmaxxing by worshiping FAT BITCHES, is our birthright and god's chosen destiny to become feeders and architects to make the perfect FAT BITCH.
 
She absolutely is not, first of all she's ugly in the face, brown as shit, and flat as a board. An attractive woman has a nice symmetrical face, has white to ruddy skin, not overweight, and nice round boobs that fill your hands. She has to look like she'll be nice to you, bear some good looking kids, and feed them well (with her boobs.) You know, like that Sydney Sweeny chick.

This is not difficult.
Sydney Sweeny is the kind of woman that will date an average guy, run him in to debt over "self care", cause a bunch of drama with his friends and family, destroys his reputation over petty shit, has a kid with him that is used like a prop, then divorces him over nothing and still gets alimony. The worst part about the whole thing being, everybody still sorta sees it as worth it due to just how hot she is.
Many such cases.
 
Back