He didn't, you can read the entire judgment against him
online. Here's a rundown:
- During discovery, Jones claimed he had no access to Google Analytics data. Testimony by his employees revealed they did in fact have access to that data.
- He also refused to request the data from Google, and didn't raise this objection until the data was due. (note that you have only a very short window to object to a discovery request, waiting until the due date is not allowed)
- He claimed he emailed the analytics data to the plaintiffs; he lied
- A general pattern of not objecting to a discovery request until right before it's due, months or even years later, there are at least 3 separate incidents in the doc
- Ranting about the plaintiff's lawyers on air, violating a court order
- Tried to delay the lawsuit by demanding Hillary Clinton(!!!) be brought in for a deposition and putting confidential information in it (it's a public document).
- Claimed they didn't maintain or utilize a particular sort of ledger which they absolutely did
Etc.
People seem to struggle with this idea, but lying to a judge, refusing to comply with orders, or playing games with requests is a lot like responding to a cop by shouting, "Fuck you, pig!" and grabbing for your waistband. Don't do it. You will get raped.
Sponsored by Bogliacci
