#MoreThanARefugee salt - youtube has a message for all of us

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
The salt on that side is YouTube skipped father's day entirely after doing a nice mothers day video the month before and then went full kebab two days later. It's grasping at straws really, because I had a nice fathers day without a video sharing site telling me to but you know how snowflakes are on either side making shit about their fee fees at all times

It seems a little weird that the same group of people who had a rage stroke over the mothers day video got pissed that theirs no fathers day video for them to cringe over when it inevitably has gay dads in it.

I've actually seen that fathers day conspiracy in the comment section too. Maybe some country has it on the 2oth? But I know both the USA and the UK have it on the 18th this year.
 
I'd like someone to make a counter point video, showing off how "nice" and "friendly" these refugees actually are, and how they treat the countries that house them for being "misunderstood people". Sometimes sure, there are some good people coming, but its heavily outnumbered by the obvious dangerous ones who want to take advantage of being let in to do what they want to do and bully the people that live there. Makes me sick.

It's seriously sad how they equate current refugees to refugees that were coming 20+ years ago. What's flooding in now is literally the dregs of society. Where as 20+ years ago you were more likely to have genuine cases and people who got along with everyone else, now they're just happily importing terrorism.
 
It's just a hashtag lol calm down guys.

Besides, I wouldn't go to YOUTUBE of all companies, who's CEO is against every leadership skill in proceeding noble causes, for pro-humanitarian campaigns.
 
Autocorrect and I aren't very good friends. Was supposed to be "move" instead of "mice"
Then you may REEE about Islam. Honestly, it's all numbers when you get apathetic enough, and the numbers aren't that scary. Perhaps I have a case of the 'tism, but I don't really see why wasting millions of dollars to save, maybe, a thousand people would be worth it.
 
Then you may REEE about Islam. Honestly, it's all numbers when you get apathetic enough, and the numbers aren't that scary. Perhaps I have a case of the 'tism, but I don't really see why wasting millions of dollars to save, maybe, a thousand people would be worth it.


Because the lives and well being of your countrymen should matter to you and introducing shit in to the stream that might objectively cause them great harm, grief or terrible loss should probably be avoided out of the most basic fundamentals of simply being a good neighbor, citizen and/or leader
 
Remember that the news focuses on these attacks more often. Every week, more people die in car accidents than the combined kill count of all of those attacks you mentioned.
DAeKb23XoAE325S.jpg
 
Then you may REEE about Islam. Honestly, it's all numbers when you get apathetic enough, and the numbers aren't that scary. Perhaps I have a case of the 'tism, but I don't really see why wasting millions of dollars to save, maybe, a thousand people would be worth it.

You're having a Tism Tantrum. Just lay down.
 
Then you may REEE about Islam. Honestly, it's all numbers when you get apathetic enough, and the numbers aren't that scary. Perhaps I have a case of the 'tism, but I don't really see why wasting millions of dollars to save, maybe, a thousand people would be worth it.

I hate to use this quote because it's from alpha cunt Ann Coulter but it's relevant and true so.

Why is it that whenever a Muslim refugee inevitably goes on a killing spree the leaders of Europe throw up their hands and declare nothing can be done except pray for the victims? Muslim extremists aren't natural disasters like hurricanes or floods, they're entirely the result of a government policy which actively imports them.
 
I'm going to preface this by saying that refugees are their own worst enemy. There are some good ones, don't get me wrong, but fuck if I've ever met a decent one.
They have a bad reputation because they, for the most part, treat the country they've moved to like the one they left. They litter, they don't work, they steal, they start fights (sometimes between entire families) and they even rape/murder without giving a shit because the country they left didn't give a shit. Most of them can't speak a word of the language they moved to and most are illiterate in every language. They're enemployable and antisocial and they refuse to fix this problem.
Are all Refugee's guilty of this? No, of course not, but they're not doing much to change people's opinions.
It's a worrying sign when the majority of muslims I know (who've been in the country for maybe 10 years) voted for UKIP because they genuinely can't stand the refugee's coming into the country now.
and then of course there's shit like this: http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...ment-complex/ar-BBCZoq5?li=AAmiR2Z&ocid=ientp
But that's another story entirely
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because the lives and well being of your countrymen should matter to you and introducing shit in to the stream that might objectively cause them great harm, grief or terrible loss should probably be avoided out of the most basic fundamentals of simply being a good neighbor, citizen and/or leader
Bright idea: how about we make their countries not shitty so they don't come here? Because building a wall won't stop them, if anything, it'll just skew the fit, young male to others ratio more.
 
Bright idea: how about we make their countries not shitty so they don't come here? Because building a wall won't stop them, if anything, it'll just skew the fit, young male to others ratio more.

Yes, let's just throw money at Syria and see if it sticks, it's not like the billions of aid that gets funneled into Africa isn't mostly stolen by warlords
 
Yes, let's just throw money at Syria and see if it sticks, it's not like the billions of aid that gets funneled into Africa isn't mostly stolen by warlords
Throwing guns hasn't worked. Who even said we'd send aid? We'd basically just say "if you guys blow up another hospital we'll bomb the crap out of you", and considering the U.N's rather weak position outside Europe, current geopolitics would basically allow napalm strikes on cities. Because if you burn thirty Syrians to save a U.S citizen, that's alright, according to the U.S citizen fatality metric we're using on this issue. Besides, drone strikes paste civilians in the Middle East all the goddamn time, so a few more "accidents" or "cases of collateral damage" really won't offend anyone.


Perhaps I'm to apathetic for this.
 
Bright idea: how about we make their countries not shitty so they don't come here? Because building a wall won't stop them, if anything, it'll just skew the fit, young male to others ratio more.


Because spending tax dollars on other countries with no other value than to make them maintain their own borders is essentially paying in to a protection racket
 
Throwing guns hasn't worked. Who even said we'd send aid? We'd basically just say "if you guys blow up another hospital we'll bomb the crap out of you", and considering the U.N's rather weak position outside Europe, current geopolitics would basically allow napalm strikes on cities. Because if you burn thirty Syrians to save a U.S citizen, that's alright, according to the U.S citizen fatality metric we're using on this issue. Besides, drone strikes paste civilians in the Middle East all the goddamn time, so a few more "accidents" or "cases of collateral damage" really won't offend anyone.


Perhaps I'm to apathetic for this.

Lets do nothing and shrug when innocent people continue to die ~ Dr W

You must be an absolute joy to be around.
 
Throwing guns hasn't worked. Who even said we'd send aid? We'd basically just say "if you guys blow up another hospital we'll bomb the crap out of you", and considering the U.N's rather weak position outside Europe, current geopolitics would basically allow napalm strikes on cities. Because if you burn thirty Syrians to save a U.S citizen, that's alright, according to the U.S citizen fatality metric we're using on this issue. Besides, drone strikes paste civilians in the Middle East all the goddamn time, so a few more "accidents" or "cases of collateral damage" really won't offend anyone.


Perhaps I'm to apathetic for this.

Thinking the USA would get away with unilaterally napalming cities in the Middle East is about as autistic/removed from reality as thinking that throwing aid money there would get the religious fundamentalists backed by oil money to stop brainwashing their citizens to jihad against any neighbors who disagree with them.

I know acting all removed from the situation gives you the dopamine rush of smug superiority but to most people you just look like an autistic jackass.
 
Most of them have probably never actually met a refugee. They just believe the latest fear mongering news they see online.
Most of these faggots would never even say half the shit they're commenting to a refugee in real life.
This is why I advocate for parents to beat their children.

We'd never have these SJWs and alt-right pearl clutchers if parents would beat their children more everytime they start unironically supporting Hitler or claiming that they're trans at the age of 7
Please include me in this.
It's seriously sad how they equate current refugees to refugees that were coming 20+ years ago. What's flooding in now is literally the dregs of society. Where as 20+ years ago you were more likely to have genuine cases and people who got along with everyone else, now they're just happily importing terrorism.
I'd like someone to make a counter point video, showing off how "nice" and "friendly" these refugees actually are, and how they treat the countries that house them for being "misunderstood people". Sometimes sure, there are some good people coming, but its heavily outnumbered by the obvious dangerous ones who want to take advantage of being let in to do what they want to do and bully the people that live there. Makes me sick.
Terrorist attacks are only commited by the 1 sociopathic rando or 2 devout kebab couple out of the literal thousands coming in and making a new, better life for themselves.
Even with all of those attacks combined, I HIGHLY doubt the amount of Aloha SnackBars match the amount of peaceful refugees.

On another note, I don't buy the whole "MUH WORKING AGE MEN AREN'T STAYING IN SYRIA TO FIGHT ISIS AND ARE LEECHING OFF THE PURE EUROPEAN SYSTEMMMM INSTEAD OF MAKING THEIR OWN!!"

Because they'll TOTALLY be able to fight against nutso terrorists with semi-autos and bombs, and then repair a broken system created by a religion that taps into the deepest, most fanatical parts of the brain. Yeah. Sure.
 
I can get believing that most refugees are peaceful, but when you say more people are killed by (insert here) than by terrorist, you make it seem like it isn't a problem. Car accidents are one thing, being blown up at a concert by an extremist is another.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom