What do you think about tattoos?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think people who want and like tattoos have the freedom of expression, and the freedom to get them done. However, the freedom to expression does not protect you from getting criticized. I would personally get tattoos as long as I think they'd look nice and in very specific parts of my body I could cover up if need be.

Most tattoos I've seen are either fucking ugly, or those thin lined tattoos that'll be non-existant in 10 years unless you constantly get them touched up. I also don't understand covering your entire body with nonsense to a point you're more ink than skin.
lmao some of the tattoos I got were from when I was a kid and my friends and I took turns sitting on a weight bench doing them to each other while we were drinking whisky. We didn't even use a real tattoo gun we used India ink and a gun we made out of an xbox controller. :story:
It's just funny to me that everyone is like "No never not at all it's trashy" or "Only if it's a beautiful gorgeous work of art" and I was 13 going what do I want tattooed? I don't know just draw something I don't give a shit. :lol:
 
Last edited:
lmao some of the tattoos I got were from when I was a kid and my friends and I took turns sitting on a weight bench doing them to each other while we were drinking whiskey. We didn't even use a real tattoo gun we used India ink and a gun we made out of an xbox controller. :story:
It's just funny to me that everyone is like "No never not at all it's trashy" or "Only if it's a beautiful gorgeous work of art" and I was 13 going what do I want tattooed? I don't know just draw something I don't give a shit. :lol:

I knew someone who did stick and poke tattoos with india ink at raves. I just pray to god they were sterilizing that fucking needle.
 
I knew someone who did stick and poke tattoos with india ink at raves. I just pray to god they were sterilizing that fucking needle.
We weren't, but we were all 13 so we knew none of us had AIDS or anything. We also made the half boong kids go last because ew.
I mean we clipped and sharpened the guitar string and dipped it in whisky every time between each person so it was a new section, but I'm sure there was some kind of cross contamination there. You know how it goes though dumb 13 year old boys.
 
Body grafetti typically looks retarded. I'm not that against tattoos in principle, but because are getting shallow tattoos for shallow reasons.

On a woman I love, I would dislike it because it makes it seem like a part of her body is always covered up and hidden from me. I don't care how high quality the art of this tattoo is, I'm never going to appreciate it as much as I would your bare skin.
 
I change my mind too much to commit to any tattoo myself, but I enjoy looking at good tattoo art on others. I do wonder how they deal with growing out of it though, you can't possibly have the same connection to the tattoo 10 years down the road unless it's a portrait of your grandma or something.
 
Tattoos are for insecure people who want to look cool/tough/deep. They are also stupid, as you are letting some stranger (probably a meth head) put chemicals into your body with a needle. There is research showing they are probably bad for your health. Everyone and their granny has one now, so you don't even look cool anymore.
One caveat: swastika tattoo on the forehead is still based.
 
I change my mind too much to commit to any tattoo myself, but I enjoy looking at good tattoo art on others. I do wonder how they deal with growing out of it though, you can't possibly have the same connection to the tattoo 10 years down the road unless it's a portrait of your grandma or something.
a tattoofag would probably tell you something like “its a part of my journey man, it doesnt matter that i dont like it now, its part of my story bro” my mom has tons of tats and would have gotten me one underage if i wanted but i didnt, it probably would have given me serious rizz too but i didnt want or need it, my sisters have a lot of tattoos, not having them in current year is far more counter culture, look at these celebs recently having all their tats removed after promoting it to the goyim for decades, i’d be PISSED lol
 
Going by the traditional 1-10 scale, tattoos can potentially bring a person's appearance up by 2 points, or down by 5. A conventionally attractive person a with a set of quality tattoos and good composition/placement can look better for it. On the other hand, anything that screams poor judgement like bad quality work, bad placement, or clashing styles/colors can make a conventionally attractive person utterly unfuckable.

With anything permanent, you should think about it carefully. Problem is, people are for the most part stupid and impulsive.

Also, this Gen Z trend of getting your hands, neck, face tattooed before literally anything else is retarded. Why get jobstopper tattoos before ones you can cover and actually work a normal job in? Also it looks stupid, its like wearing an ushanka, scarf, mittens, snow boots and just underwear. Incredibly unbalanced composition.

After 10 years? Looks like shit. The colors fade and the ink starts to run and it gets all blotchy.
This depends a lot on the style. The old masters knew what they were doing: bold linework, strong shading, and simple color palettes will hold a lot better than delicate lines and over the top colors. I know a chick who got a very colorful galaxy tattoo on her chest, looked great when it was fresh. Now it just looks like a unicorn shit on her chest.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom