Science Drug That Makes Blood Lethal to Mosquitoes In Testing

NPR Article
Imagine this: A pesky mosquito sips some of your blood. Hours later, the blood-sucker drops dead, poisoned by the very blood it just slurped down.

That may sound too good to be true, but it's a tantalizing possibility, according to research published this week in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The study points to a potential new tool to fight malaria: the medication ivermectin. Studies conducted in the 2000s, including one in 2010, show that malaria-carrying mosquitoes die after feeding on individuals who have ingested the drug.

Malaria is a mosquito-borne infection that affects more than 200 million people worldwide. The disease is transmitted when an infected mosquito bites an individual, spreading a parasite called plasmodium. In humans, the parasite can cause fever, headache, chills and even death. Despite years of eradication efforts in developing countries, growing research shows malaria-carrying mosquitoes are becoming resistant to the insecticides meant to wipe them out.

"Since 2015, the number of annual deaths from malaria has stabilized," says Menno Smit, MD, a Ph.D. candidate at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine who led the new study. "We're not making any more progress. We need new tools, and ivermectin could be one."

In their study, the researchers demonstrate that three high doses of ivermectin make human blood deadly to mosquitoes for up 28 days after the third treatment. This high dose of ivermectin was also well-tolerated with few side effects.

"The most exciting result was the fact that even one month after [the subjects took] ivermectin, their blood was still killing mosquitoes," Smit says. "That's much longer than we thought."

To reach these conclusions, researchers at the Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital in Kenya gave 47 participants 600 miligrams of ivermectin in tablet form for three days in a row. Blood samples were obtained from these participants six times and then fed to mosquitoes in cages.

"We put the blood in an artificial membrane that mosquitoes could bite on and then watched," Smit explains. "Most died within a week after [drinking] the blood."

Two weeks after feeding, 97 percent of the mosquitoes had died.

Another group of 48 patients were given a dosage of 300 milligrams but the mosquito death rate was not as high.

Either dose is higher than usual. More than 2.5 billion ivermectin treatmentshave been distributed since 1987 for the treatment of parasitic infections, typically one annual dose of up to 200 milligrams.

In this study, Smit says the high dosage of 600 milligrams for three days was well-tolerated. Participants reported few side effects, though he admits everyone in the study was already hospitalized and receiving treatment for malaria.

"The patients may have noticed less side effects because they were already feeling sick," Smit explains. "We have yet to see if the excellent tolerance we saw would be just as good in healthy individuals."

Smit adds that the high dose of ivermectin still needs to be tested in children to ensure that it is safe for all ages.

Dr. Peter Hotez, who was not involved in the study and is dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at the Baylor College of Medicine, says bigger studies need to be done before ivermectin is seriously considered as part of a national malaria control program.

But "I think ivermectin has potential as a supplemental strategy for malaria control and prevention," Hotez wrote in an email to NPR. "The drug has an excellent safety track record from its use in mass drug administration campaigns in Africa."

Hotez warns that, though ivermectin is an exciting possibility, there is the potential for mosquitoes to build drug resistance. That's why a vaccine is still needed, he says.

Dr. Regina Rabinovich, a malaria scholar at Harvard University who was not involved with the study, agrees that ivermectin is worth pursuing to help fight malaria — as one more "imperfect tool" in the global arsenal against a "tricky" disease.

In a separate commentary on the study, Rabinovich writes that "more than one approach will probably be needed to confront this challenge [of malaria]." Perhaps new drugs that have a similar effect on mosquitoes can be developed that have a longer lasting effect, she says.

In an email to NPR, she stresses the need for trials in an area where malaria is rampant — and reminds people that researchers need to make sure that by killing mosquitoes, ivermectin can also decrease transmission, too.

Nadia Whitehead is a freelance journalist and a science writer. Her work has appeared in Science, The Washington Post and NPR. Find her on Twitter @NadiaMacias.

Editor's note: The original version of this post wrote that ivermectin is used to treat the disease "elephantitis." Several readers noted that a more commonly used term for this condition is "elephantiasis." We have updated the post.
The study done
Summary
Background
Ivermectin is being considered for mass drug administration for malaria due to its ability to kill mosquitoes feeding on recently treated individuals. However, standard, single doses of 150–200 μg/kg used for onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis have a short-lived mosquitocidal effect (<7 days). Because ivermectin is well tolerated up to 2000 μg/kg, we aimed to establish the safety, tolerability, and mosquitocidal efficacy of 3 day courses of high-dose ivermectin, co-administered with a standard malaria treatment.

Methods
We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial at the Jaramogi Oginga Odinga Teaching and Referral Hospital (Kisumu, Kenya). Adults (aged 18–50 years) were eligible if they had confirmed symptomatic uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and agreed to the follow-up schedule. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using sealed envelopes, stratified by sex and body-mass index (men: <21 vs ≥21 kg/m2; women: <23 vs ≥23 kg/m2), with permuted blocks of three, to receive 3 days of ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day, ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day, or placebo, all co-administered with 3 days of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. Blood of patients taken on post-treatment days 0, 2 + 4 h, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 was fed to laboratory-reared Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto mosquitoes, and mosquito survival was assessed daily for 28 days after feeding. The primary outcome was 14-day cumulative mortality of mosquitoes fed 7 days after ivermectin treatment (from participants who received at least one dose of study medication). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02511353.

Findings
Between July 20, 2015, and May 7, 2016, 741 adults with malaria were assessed for eligibility, of whom 141 were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day (n=47), ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day (n=48), or placebo (n=46). 128 patients (91%) attended the primary outcome visit 7 days post treatment. Compared with placebo, ivermectin was associated with higher 14 day post-feeding mosquito mortality when fed on blood taken 7 days post treatment (ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day risk ratio [RR] 2·26, 95% CI 1·93–2·65, p<0·0001; hazard ratio
6·32, 4·61–8·67, p<0·0001; ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day RR 2·18, 1·86–2·57, p<0·0001; HR 4·21, 3·06–5·79, p<0·0001). Mosquito mortality remained significantly increased 28 days post treatment (ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day RR 1·23, 1·01–1·50, p=0·0374; and ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day 1·21, 1·01–1·44, p=0·0337). Five (11%) of 45 patients receiving ivermectin 600 μg/kg per day, two (4%) of 48 patients receiving ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day, and none of 46 patients receiving placebo had one or more treatment-related adverse events.

Interpretation
Ivermectin at both doses assessed was well tolerated and reduced mosquito survival for at least 28 days after treatment. Ivermectin 300 μg/kg per day for 3 days provided a good balance between efficacy and tolerability, and this drug shows promise as a potential new tool for malaria elimination.

Funding
Malaria Eradication Scientific Alliance (MESA) and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).


 
That may sound too good to be true, but it's a tantalizing possibility, according to research published this week in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The study points to a potential new tool to fight malaria: the medication ivermectin. Studies conducted in the 2000s, including one in 2010, show that malaria-carrying mosquitoes die after feeding on individuals who have ingested the drug.

Isn’t that what’s used for dogs in heartworm medicine? And it’s only now that they’re looking into how it affects humans?
 
Isn’t that what’s used for dogs in heartworm medicine? And it’s only now that they’re looking into how it affects humans?
Consider the math:

Let diseases and conditions humans can have be represented as N. Let all medicines, just the ones that exist at present, be represented by X.

N is mind bogglingly massive, easily in the millions. X is similarly huge.

Crosstesting every drug for every condition is N^X. That's "age of the universe" levels of shitfuckery.
 
Isn’t that what’s used for dogs in heartworm medicine? And it’s only now that they’re looking into how it affects humans?

It's been used in humans a fair bit, for parasitic infections.

It's also incredibly cheap. You can get enough of the stuff to deworm a herd of horses from your local farm store, and probably get change for a $50 bill.
 
It still transmitted whatever disease it was carrying, though.

It would still drastically reduce the transmission of diseases though, limiting it to whoever it bites before it dies.

As a bonus, it's only female mosquitos that are going to start breeding that feed on blood, so it means they will be too dead to make more mosquitos.
 
As incredibly useful and beneficial as this is, I do think we'll need to do a lot of tests on the long term effects of what exactly this drug will do to the human body. Sure, tests have been conducted in 2010, but what about long-term use of the drug? Will it do any harm to the body after using it for 10, 20, even 30 years? Having human blood poisonous to mosquitoes feels like a thin line between that and the blood being toxic to the carrier as well. And that's not even getting into the possibilities of blood disease and cancers.

It is definitely exciting though; mosquitoes are probably one of the only creatures you can eliminate and actually benefit the ecosystem as a whole. They don't serve any purpose besides being evil. It would certainly help prevent the spread of the more destructive diseases in places like Africa.
 
As incredibly useful and beneficial as this is, I do think we'll need to do a lot of tests on the long term effects of what exactly this drug will do to the human body. Sure, tests have been conducted in 2010, but what about long-term use of the drug? Will it do any harm to the body after using it for 10, 20, even 30 years? Having human blood poisonous to mosquitoes feels like a thin line between that and the blood being toxic to the carrier as well. And that's not even getting into the possibilities of blood disease and cancers.

It is definitely exciting though; mosquitoes are probably one of the only creatures you can eliminate and actually benefit the ecosystem as a whole. They don't serve any purpose besides being evil. It would certainly help prevent the spread of the more destructive diseases in places like Africa.

Many birds, bats and other insects feed on mosquitoes though. Some males aid in pollination. But then again the males don't drink blood.
 
I've heard that there are ways to introduce deliberate infertility into the mosquito population that would decimate their population in a few generations, but nobody wanted to do it because of the ecological impact it might have. They're diseased little shits, but things still eat them.
 
^It's best to make the drug lethal or introduce sterilization specifically to the invasive ones like Asian tiger mosquitoes, who outcompete the native species important to the ecosystem, and happen to carry most diseases.
 
Only environmental downside is what mosquito predators might feed on without the little cunts.

Then again iirc many predators focus on the larvae, but seeing as the mosquito population is massive I wonder how much bigger it could be if they had no predators at all.
 
While mosquitoes are unpleasant little turds with wings, there are plenty of animals who eat them, and it just seems like a very bad idea to wipe them out. I'm personally not a tick fan, but I don't think eliminating them is a particularly good idea.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Captain_Asshole
I've heard that there are ways to introduce deliberate infertility into the mosquito population that would decimate their population in a few generations, but nobody wanted to do it because of the ecological impact it might have. They're diseased little shits, but things still eat them.

There's also Project Needlenose, which aims to use genetic engineering to cut out and make mosquitos immune to malaria. A small colony exists currently, but is kept in a lab.

Scientists haven't deployed it in the wild yet, since they're not sure of the long term impacts (Would it harm their cuteness?), and because it would be unleashing the proverbial genie in a bottle, and to make sure the gene is modified correctly, so that it overwrites any other gene it's paired with.

That and they're doing the genetic modification using CRISPR2, which is still relatively new, but a goddamn powerful tool that basically scans the DNA and removes any errors it finds, so it could be used to remove any genetic problem that it's programmed to, like autism, down syndrome, etc.

Of course, it can also be used to modify things like ears, noses, etc. Basically, it's future medicine that we're kinda working the kinks out of.
 
Back