- Joined
- Mar 23, 2016
By refusing to debate """Nazis""", you only allow them to stay within their own bubble where their ideas are not contested. By not engaging them in a debate, you don't show why the things they say are wrong.
Dobson's awesome plan (and really, every SJWs plan by extension) is to correct someone's bad behaviour by beating them into submission by calling them Nazis.
In their mind, calling someone a Nazi is the thermonuclear option that will force the other side to change their ways. Just look at the latest minority related situations at Starbucks and the likes.
One of the reasons why SJWs go fucking apeshit over the alt-right is that they refuse to play by these rules. You call them Nazis and they just shrug and continue to do their thing. To the contrary, the whole "You disagreed, therefore you are a gamergate nazi bigot alt-righter!" is what made them so strong in the first place.
That's a really butchered version of "The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing".
I mean, Dobson isn't wrong. Sometimes "morally right" and "legal" aren't the same thing, but he's making an incredibly piss poor attempt to bring that pont across.
To Dobson a "strawman" is when someone tries to negate his masterfully crafted argument with a buzzword cause said person is jealous of Dobson's artistic skill or is a redneck bigot who hates his political views.It's also clear that Dobson either doesn't understand what a "strawman" is
It's just a vaguely defined concept that means "something I dislike being accused of" to Dobson.
Watch Dobson, in his flush of victory, piss away the little success of having a shitton of asspatters come to his aide the last time by being an irredeemable douchebag. To a tranny no less.

Also, just to emphasize, Dobson, reknown """"pacifist"""", thinks a war (ie: violence) is a profound method to determine who's right about their standpoint. I don't even...
I caught that, too. Guess that means the Indians were wrong, for being weaker than european settlers. And of course, blacks were wrong, for being weaker than the western nations (and their own slave-selling brethren). And Dobson was wrong for being sprayed with water.Anybody else seeing the irony (and hypocrisy) in Dobson stating that Nazism's defeat in WW II "proved it wrong", when Dobson has also previously said that he's a pacifist and that Might Does Not Make Right?
Maybe this waste of air and Dobdadfunds should pick up a book aimed at someone above the age of 10, a basic education could get him into contact with such quotes like:
"War does not determine who is right - only who is left."
- Bertrand Russel.
Whenever Dobson is high on his own farts for having been just midly successfull, the very next thing is that he tries to recreate that, fails miserably, picks the single worst person to debate in the single worst way possible and making himself look like a cunt that would become the thing of legends.
It's times like these where it's genuinely hard not to a-log this buffoon.
See, the funny thing is that by doing so, Dobson admits that they have no argument. If it's this easy to prove Nazis wrong, then how come they are afraid to let them speak freely? Shouldn't they be well capable of shooting down their arguments in a heartbeat?Because, in Dobson's IngSocJus-warped view, even allowing Nazis to speak is support, because of course, 'only a Nazi would want Nazis to be heard'!
It's really weird, because it gives the impression that anyone who's heard Nazi ideology will be instantly converted to Nazism.
By treating Nazi-ideology like a highly contagious plague that gets spread by being exposed to it just once, they admit that their own arguments against it suck.