Manosphere Fonduman / mooooo - (he shits up our loveshy threads)

[XH 502]

Hate to disappoint ya bub;

Spoiler

Please don't bring that rape glorification in here.

 

[wagglyplacebo]

five-inch cock

You're exaggerating.

 

[mooooo]

Do you ever threaten your wife? Because it sounds like she'd jump on your five-inch cock immediately if you threatened to harm her.

ALSO, where's the article?

She's from a different culture. Different environment, different traits that are attractive.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

I didn't say that.

https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/enjoy-rape-png.18808/

when a guy hits a woman [...] there's some element of it that is attractive [to her].

[EDIT]

And BTW,

that'd be like me saying crack addicts like crack

You just claimed that women enjoy violence again. Don't think for a second that we missed that.

 

[Saul Goodman]

Actually, I referenced the newspaper because it's considered politically correct and widely accepted. Of course, the paper exaggerated. A "beating" could be any small abusive action, like an insult.

"The newspaper"? Where's the actual article, @mooooo ?

And now the infamous tactic of redefining one's terms upon defeat -- really, does the word "beating" not have a clearly accepted meaning anymore? I expected better, even from you.

Seriously. Show me this non-existent article that talks about how women will take 26 beatings (and that defines beatings as "any small abusive action").

 

[Atsimuel]

She's from a different culture. Different environment, different traits that are attractive.

Small willies.

 

[XH 502]

She's from a different culture. Different environment, different traits that are attractive.

You never specified culture. You said "women" in a sweeping generalization.

Where is this newspaper article?

 

[Saul Goodman]

That would be true if there was nothing wrong with women being attracted to this behaviour. Our stance is that both violent men and behaviour that enables it is messed up.

So, let me get this straight. It is your contention that domestic violence is the fault of both "violent" abusers and the victims' "behaviour that enables [them]."

Wow, you are fucked up.

 

[mooooo]

I can't seem to find the exact article I saw before, but this seems to be a reference to something similar:

http://www.closeronline.co.uk/2014/...-a-woman-to-leave-an-abusive-man#.VPjwq8seKBZ

 

[Chubby_Penguin]

That would be true if there was nothing wrong with women being attracted to this behaviour. Our stance is that both violent men and behaviour that enables it is messed up.

Usually women in abusive relationships aren't staying because it's hot. They also become emotionally abused and told they're nothing without him.

My cousin ended up being an abuser to his ex wife and we heard plenty about his messed up logic on relationships. We ended up helping her get out of the relationship though and she is currently living with a good guy who she has a kid with. I'm glad she got a happy ending.

 

[XH 502]

I can't seem to find the exact article I saw before, but this seems to be a reference to something similar:

http://www.closeronline.co.uk/2014/...-a-woman-to-leave-an-abusive-man#.VPjwq8seKBZ

A celebrity tweet does not constitute as a reliable source of scientific fact.

 

[mooooo]

So, let me get this straight. It is your contention that the domestic violence is the fault of both "violent" abusers and the victims' "behaviour that enables [them]."

Wow, you are fucked up.

No. Say you have 10 men. 2 are violent. 5 are in relationships. Both violent men are in relationships. The women don't cause the violence, but the rate of violence in relationships is higher than if they avoided them instead.

 

[Atsimuel]

I can't seem to find the exact article I saw before, but this seems to be a reference to something similar:

http://www.closeronline.co.uk/2014/...-a-woman-to-leave-an-abusive-man#.VPjwq8seKBZ

HAHAHAHAHCLOSERMAGAZINEHAHAHAHA

 

[wagglyplacebo]

I can't seem to find the exact article I saw before, but this seems to be a reference to something similar:

http://www.closeronline.co.uk/2014/...-a-woman-to-leave-an-abusive-man#.VPjwq8seKBZ

That's just some dudes mom on twitter saying that. So yeah not good enough.

 

[JU 199]

@mooooo Why do you hate women?

I'm sure your capable of answering such a simple question that's clearly below your massive intellect?

 

[mooooo]

A celebrity tweet does not constitute as a reliable source of scientific fact.

I didn't state it to prove a point in the first place. Are you actually contending that women don't often stay with abusers quite long, whether or not you chalk it up to what i think, or co-dependency, or breaking her self esteem until she feels she deserves it, or whatever?

 

[Atsimuel]

No. Say you have 10 men. 2 are violent. 5 are in relationships. Both violent men are in relationships. The women don't cause the violence, but the rate of violence in relationships is higher than if they avoided them instead.

Yeah, you can prove anything when you just pull statistics out of your arse, can't you?

 

[Saul Goodman]

It escalated until it outweighed his attractiveness.

Also, those guys have appeal as sexual partners, not as long term partners.

Right, because women just like Jerks (TM) not Nice Guys (TM) like yourself. Mhmmm.

Did you ever think it might be because the "jerks" actually ask the girls out? Instead of slipping creepy poems under their doors?

And if you didn't escalate your waistline so far, you might not have outweighed your attractiveness. Amirite?

 

[mooooo]

@mooooo Why do you hate women?

I'm sure your capable of answering such a simple question that's clearly below your massive intellect?

Why is the moon a cylinder? Can you answer that simple question?

 

[XH 502]

No. Say you have 10 men. 2 are violent. 5 are in relationships. Both violent men are in relationships. The women don't cause the violence, but the rate of violence in relationships is higher than if they avoided them instead.