Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So let me get this straight,the thought of a world full of sociopathic men with low IQs bothers you so much... that it makes you hate women.
Oops, I mean women. WAIT I MEAN SLUTS.
I wish people would stop mincing my words and projecting their biases onto me. I never claimed to hate women. I do not hate women or minorities.

And yet contributions to society don't seem to be slowing down any. Live-saving medicines and technologies and fancy new stuff keep showing up, so all these most capable men are still contributing, despite the abundance of sluts.

How exactly did those naughty sluts "create that climate", again?
It will all catch up with us sooner or later. These advancements are just engineering, piggybacking off the work of geniuses of times past. They are not groundbreaking discoveries.

Even before divorce and single parenthood became socially acceptable, there were loads of kids growing up in "suboptimal" enviroments. Kids being raised in poverty, kids being raised by abusers, kids being raised without being given any opportunities to succeed. If you really care that much about bettering the living situations of children in high-risk environments, you'd do a lot better to set your sights on poverty and economic inequality instead of women's lib. Hell, you'd do better by fighting for economic equality for women, because there will always be women who chose single parenthood (or are forced into it due to circumstances beyond their control), and giving them opportunities to better their lives means bettering the lives of their children too.
I'm all for helping to fix poverty and economic inequality. Why can't we have both?

As an aside, if you compare the rates of child mortality today to the rates of child mortality even fifty years ago, this is the most optimal time to grow up simply because this is the time you're least likely to die from some horrible preventable thing. Like, sure, you might grow up in broken home, but at least you don't have to worry about dying from polio.

Maybe if more people died from polio, we would have evolved an immunity to it and then we wouldn't have to inject our kids with mercury.

Alright, so I gave @Amud his own thread and moved all the posts about him from the SlutHate threads here.
Please use such for further discussion of the Balloon Loon himself and the SlutHate thread for more general discussion of his favorite site.

Currently waiting on some kind of evidence that can confirm Amud's identity to get him the renown verified status.

I'm honored. What would you like me to do to prove my identity?
 
2. The information I linked was created and posted by myself. It doesn't matter what site I post it on. The point is, I came up with it. Maybe you should decide whether it is legit or not based on your own reading of it, rather than the connotation of the website it is posted on. Also, the idea of "Scientifically valid sources" is completely meaningless. There is no reason to trust academic authorities any more than you trust me. They are not spiritually ordained loremasters of the world, they are just people like you and me who just so happened to buy a slip of paper giving them "credentials" for tens of thousands of dollars every year.

This is the dumbest string of words I have ever read in my life. People don't "pay for a slip of paper". They work rigorously for years to research their particular field, writing books that allow them to become professors and continuing to develop theses and papers for the rest of their lives. By your reasoning, should we listen to you instead of medical professionals? After all, they often go to "buy their slip of paper".
 
I wish people would stop mincing my words and projecting their biases onto me. I never claimed to hate women. I do not hate women or minorities.


It will all catch up with us sooner or later. These advancements are just engineering, piggybacking off the work of geniuses of times past. They are not groundbreaking discoveries.


was community college your safe school after princeton?
 
Eh, I'm just doing it for the experience, mainly. It's easy and unlikely to kill me, so why not give it a shot? If it improves my face, I'll be happy. If it doesn't, then it's not like I lost anything, right?

I hate sluts for a multitude of reasons.

*They accelerate the genetic degeneration of our species by only allowing low IQ psychopathic specimens with Ignobilid features (for example, upper facial flatness) to procreate
*They have created a climate in which many of the most capable of men have greatly reduced motivation to contribute to society
*They have destroyed the stability of the family unit, meaning that most children now grow up in a suboptimal environment. This is unfair to the children.

These three things will lead to the collapse of society as we know it unless we return to traditional ways. I don't know what is with everyone these days who thinks they are somehow above the wisdom of earlier generations. "Old ways are archaic and outdated! We need to change the way we run society with things that are unprecedented because it's PROGRESSIVE!" That attitude is incredibly arrogant. People of earlier generations were not idiots. They did things the way they did for a reason: because they worked throughout history. Changing things up is a recipe for disaster. "Progressives" such as sluts and social justice liberals are showing an immense disrespect for their ancestors.

@Amud why do you hate women and liberals?
 
You really think the rantings of an autistic racist who shoves condoms up his nasal cavity are on par with data published in peer reviewed scientific journals?
Please stop projecting your biases onto me. I am not a racist, and nothing I have posted here has indicated or implied any sort of racist views. I invite you to go over my posts and cite any passages that you believe display racist tones. I'm genuinely curious. Also, the balloons used are not condoms, they are finger cots.
 
This is the dumbest string of words I have ever read in my life. People don't "pay for a slip of paper". They work rigorously for years to research their particular field, writing books that allow them to become professors and continuing to develop theses and papers for the rest of their lives. By your reasoning, should we listen to you instead of medical professionals? After all, they often go to "buy their slip of paper".

You know, I don't think even Marjan believes something that monstrously stupid. It takes some serious effort to come off as worse than him.
 
Maybe if more people died from polio, we would have evolved an immunity to it and then we wouldn't have to inject our kids with mercury.

This is why experts with a 'slip of paper' have value. You have no idea what you are talking about.

Also, you seem to feel that anything with sexual content involved is 'degeneracy.' Do you believe that sex is a bad thing, or perhaps that it should only be engaged in for the purposes of procreation?
 
Please stop projecting your biases onto me. I am not a racist, and nothing I have posted here has indicated or implied any sort of racist views. I invite you to go over my posts and cite any passages that you believe display racist tones. I'm genuinely curious. Also, the balloons used are not condoms, they are finger cots.
118-514.jpg
So condoms for fonduman/moooo. Thanks for the clarification.
 
Please stop projecting your biases onto me. I am not a racist, and nothing I have posted here has indicated or implied any sort of racist views. I invite you to go over my posts and cite any passages that you believe display racist tones. I'm genuinely curious. Also, the balloons used are not condoms, they are finger cots.

Using cranial size and skull shape to make inferences about the intelligence and genetic superiority of some races/ethnic groups is a well known bit of pseudoscience commonly espoused by racialists, white supremacists, and advocates of eugenics. The fact that you bother posting this drivel to support your arguments seems to indicate that you agree with racist views or at the very least are sympathetic to them.
 
I take it you've read the material I linked. That should give you enough background to fully understand my explanations. If there is anything you still don't understand in my posts here or on The Apricity, don't hesitate to ask.

1. Genetic degradation refers to the trend of lower-quality people (low intelligence, ignobility, psychopathy, criminality, amygdala dysfunction, r-selection, etc.) reproducing at a drastically higher rate than people of higher quality. The result is a gradual replacement of higher-quality genes with lower-quality ones.

2. "Our species" = humans. Homo Sapiens. A good example of genetic degradation was the transition from Homo neanderthalensis to Homo sapiens.

3. What we need is an environment that fosters productivity of capable but downtrodden individuals. Where financiers don't fuck us over. Where we can expect to have a solid family. Where we can be educated for free. Where the income scale is meritocratic. Where our culture doesn't involve degenerate sexual videos and dating apps.

Classically stupid social darwinism bullshit.

You talk about genetic superiority and invoke baseless value-judgements of others, but at the end of the day cry out for special treatment because you're "downtrodden". You feel like others have privileges, and that is just not fair and desire intervention so that you can get yours.

You're exactly on par with the most insane SJWs. Your victim-complex is already starting to show.
 
why are you in community college if you are such a genius?

I never claimed to be a genius. You have put words in my mouth several times already. I really wish you would stop it.

On what basis do you decry the superior legitimacy/rigorous standards of professional credentials and testing? If in fact a professional opinion and a non-professional opinion is to be taken in equal measure, you surely can provide a reasoned argument as to why this is so, rather than expecting us to take you at your word.

"professional credentials"are just a special treehouse club. They don't study dissenting opinions. Now, fields like mathematics and applied technology are still valid, but any subjective, abstract, or theoretical fields like the humanities and social "sciences" are a bunch of opinions. You're going to college to learn opinions, and they try to tell you it's an objective fact. If anything, I would be MORE hesitant to accept the claims of the academic orthodoxy in fields related to social "Sciences". They are all constructed to confirm their bizarre, irrational "progressive" opinions.


https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSpargasm/videos why not through this wonder?
Btw, channel downloaded for archivistic purposses.
That's not me.
 
Back