T. Greg Doucette / Thomas Gregory Doucette / greg_doucette / TGDLaw / fsckemall / lawdevnull / TDot - Super Lawyer, Failed Politician, Captain of The Threadnought, Drowning in Debt

[ConSluttant]

Here’s what gets me. Randazza and Wolman have taken up some significant First Amendment legal battles over the years. Randazza in particular has been willing to represent unpopular parties and taken on formidable foes in the name of protecting freedom of speech. It fucking pains me to see these two associate with this Baby Huey-looking deadbeat dad and emoji abuser. How can their judgment be so deeply fucking flawed? I genuinely hate to see it.

This has been killing me ever since they entered into this. Very wtf for me.

Human variability. We see T. Greg as a con man because he is spouting off misinformation and general jackassery.

Randazza and Wolman probably saw a lawyer getting attacked for saying his opinion. Naturally they felt sympathetic to him.

How they got convinced that the DMCA lawsuit was a good idea is beyond me though.

Then they should have sided with Nick Rekieta, because he was a lawyer being dogpiled by pieces of shit like Douchette for stating his opinion.

Yes to all of this. It made no sense. Like at all. Randazza is known to go against the grain and the position they took was completely opposite.

Frankly, the long term reputational hit from advancing such ludicrously bogus legal arguments should have outweighed any short-term grift, especially from a penny ante huckster like Douchette. Why would you want that on your record? I'd rather defend a dozen Anglins than one Douchette.

The more I read Randazza's and Wohlman's tweets the more and more their facade of being first amendment warriors go down the drain. The shit Marc posted about HIPPA made my blood boil. It's amazing what happens when the curtain gets pulled back and they are just as worthless as every other lawyer in the sea. In the end fuck them.

Thinking for yourself is always the best. Surprise surprise. Paying 200k for an extra degree so that people think you are super extra smart only separates the retards from the non brain dead.

Meh

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

These lawyers who proclaim they are "first amendment warriors" like Randazza and Wohlman are only following the path of Ken White - fight only for the first amendment when it's politically expedient and any position that contradicts your political leanings is ineligible.

 

[Son of Sparda 84]

Twitter

archived 28 Mar 2020 16:35:34 UTC

archive.ph

This guy's sense of logic is out of this world

 

[AnOminous]

These lawyers who proclaim they are "first amendment warriors" like Randazza and Wohlman are only following the path of Ken White - fight only for the first amendment when it's politically expedient and any position that contradicts your political leanings is ineligible.

That's not really true unless Randazza is actually a neo-Nazi.

View attachment 1205953View attachment 1205968

Twitter

archived 28 Mar 2020 16:35:34 UTC

archive.ph

This guy's sense of logic is out of this world

He is even dumber than he looks, and he looks really fucking dumb.

 

[TheClappening]

View attachment 1205953View attachment 1205968

Twitter

archived 28 Mar 2020 16:35:34 UTC

archive.ph

This guy's sense of logic is out of this world

This is how you know they haven't read the filings.

Saying "Vic is a sex pest" might not be defamatory. But saying Vic, on this specific date, at this specific event, lured me to this specific hotel room and specifically tried to rape me, when he never did that is sure as fuck defamatory.

 

[AnOminous]

This is how you know they haven't read the filings.

Saying "Vic is a sex pest" might not be defamatory. But saying Vic, on this specific date, at this specific event, lured me to this specific hotel room and specifically tried to rape me, when he never did that is sure as fuck defamatory.

I doubt that beetle-browed fuck can read.

 

[feral cat #6385]

Marc Whipple wasn't confident that he'd hit his $500 goal in 30 days that he extended his campaign by an additional 7 days when Kickstarter offered it to everyone. The reason he's using Kickstarter is to raise money to pay for the cover art.

View attachment 1205608
View attachment 1205610
https://archive.vn/A1H1y / https://archive.vn/boZSi

View attachment 1205607

This is the girl he paid to voice his catgirl character. Her performance isn't part of any audiobook though.

View attachment 1205612
https://archive.vn/qKbYl

View attachment 1205614

Might want to be careful posting audio from Sabat's casting sessions.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Not gonna PL here, but I know Wolman and Randazza well enough to know this wasn’t a money play. I don’t know if it’s better or worse that they genuinely wanted to help Low T.

 

[king of pickles]

The discount Neanderthal looks like he would bomb city marathons. When he's not busy sniffing fuel and jenkem he's probably planning stuff like that, just how American bin Laden Douchette told him.

 

[TheClappening]

Not gonna PL here, but I know Wolman and Randazza well enough to know this wasn’t a money play. I don’t know if it’s better or worse that they genuinely wanted to help Low T.

I think they saw the SCV and wanted to stick it to the evil KKK for free because Douchette would totally get his crowdfunding off the ground and/or the court would award them fees.

I doubt they would've litigated for free.

 

[ogmudbone]

View attachment 1205953View attachment 1205968

Twitter

archived 28 Mar 2020 16:35:34 UTC

archive.ph

This guy's sense of logic is out of this world

He sure is showing that he doesnt care by popping into each tweet about vic.

 

[AnOminous]

Not gonna PL here, but I know Wolman and Randazza well enough to know this wasn’t a money play. I don’t know if it’s better or worse that they genuinely wanted to help Low T.

It literally was, though. They were filing in the Northern District of California specifically to take advantage of case law in that district and circuit which allowed fee shifting under § 512(f), which only the Northern District of California has ever effectively enforced (in Lenz v. Universal and a case involving corrupt voting machine manufacturer Diebold).

Had they succeeded, they'd have been paid both by the defendant and with whatever money came in from the GFM.

There's no way this wasn't a money play and it was even nakedly so.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

It literally was, though. They were filing in the Northern District of California specifically to take advantage of case law in that district and circuit which allowed fee shifting under § 512(f), which only the Northern District of California has ever effectively enforced (in Lenz v. Universal and a case involving corrupt voting machine manufacturer Diebold).

Had they succeeded, they'd have been paid both by the defendant and with whatever money came in from the GFM.

There's no way this wasn't a money play and it was even nakedly so.

To be more clear, I mean that I don’t think they helped Low T for GFM donations. For a settlement, sure.

 

[AnOminous]

To be more clear, I mean that I don’t think they helped Low T for GFM donations. For a settlement, sure.

I think they wanted to strengthen 512(f) jurisprudence, too, at least as a side effect. Doing that would cut down a lot on frivolous DMCA striking behavior. If a false DMCA strike had even a slight chance of coming back to bite you hard, abusive companies would have to reconsider their shotgun strategy.

This wasn't a particularly good case for pushing that, though, and if they had honest intentions they would have tried it in North Carolina federal court, because winning there would actually expand jurisprudence on that kind of fee shifting. Do it in three places and it begins to look like a trend.

 

[Nontransferable]

Reminder: Admission to the Texas State Bar without an examination generally takes approximately three to four months, but the board has up to 270 days to complete its investigation. T. Greg's application was submitted 261 days ago and the deadline for a decision is due by April 8th. He amended his application to include his lawsuit against Dropbox in December and isn't sure if that reset the clock.

http://archive.vn/AOfkx

https://archive.vn/HMnRW

http://archive.vn/L5Osx

#Threadnought: Texas Bar Admission, organized by T Greg Doucette

Back in early June, you probably saw folks on #LawTwitter joking about a retraction… T Greg Doucette needs your support for #Threadnought: Texas Bar Admission

www.gofundme.com

Fundraiser by T Greg Doucette : #Threadnought: Texas Bar Admission

archived 12 Nov 2019 07:39:44 UTC

archive.vn

We're done!

Earlier today, I submitted my application to the Texas Board of Law Examiners – 2 days ahead of the 7-day deadline I promised you ☺

With your help, we raised $1,265.00 for this project, which worked out to $1,210.20 after GoFundMe's fees. That got spent as follows:
==> $910.28 to the Texas Board of Law Examiners ($890.00 to the BLE, $20.28 to the Texas.gov payment processor)
==> $25.00 to the National Conference of Bar Examiners (for my MPRE scores)
==> $5.00 to the NC Supreme Court (for a Certificate of Good Standing)
==> $120.00 donated to charity (an Indiana family that needed help making their insurance premiums)

There's still $149.92 in the account that I'm holding in case the TBLE tells me I've missed something; if not, it will get donated during our next charity drive.

I'm closing out the GFM now that everything's done, so unfortunately I won't be able to send you an update through here on whether they accept my application or not because state law gives them 240 days to investigate. Keep an eye on my Twitter feed though, because I'll announce the results at the bottom of this thread on our progress:

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter

“Some of y'all suggested I become a Texas lawyer if I'm going to comment on The Threadnought Turns out I meet the qualifications, so we can totally do this if you want 😉 https://t.co/yaAL3xqwFE”

twitter.com

*THANK YOU* as always for your support, I won't let you down

 

[AnOminous]

Reminder: Admission to the Texas State Bar without an examination generally takes approximately three to four months, but the board has up to 270 days to complete its investigation. T. Greg's application was submitted 261 days ago and the deadline for a decision is due by April 8th. He amended his application to include his lawsuit against Dropbox in December and isn't sure if that reset the clock.

I'm not sure how much they'd look into the merits of that, if at all. The jurisdictional argument was ludicrous but the lawsuit itself wasn't patently frivolous, so I don't think it would have any effect.

 

[TwinkLover6969]

I'm not sure how much they'd look into the merits of that, if at all. The jurisdictional argument was ludicrous but the lawsuit itself wasn't patently frivolous, so I don't think it would have any effect.

As a layman why would they look into it at all? Greg was just the plaintiff and not a lawyer on the case?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

That's not really true unless Randazza is actually a neo-Nazi.

Well he does defend them in court. I doubt it's only because of the "First Amendment" he always claims. He's probably a modern day Judenrat.

 

[AnOminous]

As a layman why would they look into it at all? Greg was just the plaintiff and not a lawyer on the case?

Because the behavior of a lawyer in litigation is relevant to their fitness to practice law if it reflects on their character or involves moral turpitude.

 

[Bender]

Because the behavior of a lawyer in litigation is relevant to their fitness to practice law if it reflects on their character or involves moral turpitude.

>turpitude
More like torpedoed the case.

Eh? Come on, that was good right?

I'm not funny and I accept it.