Sam Vaknin, a self-aware nacrissist who wrote the book Malignant Self Love: Narcissism Revisited says that to make a narcissist uncomfortable, you have to use the "beg the question" fallacy to imply that the narcissist is a bad person in the eyes of others. Examples include "Do you think your children think you're a good person?", "Do you believe people admire you?", "Do you think other people find you that attractive?". The mechanisms behind this is very devious, because it forces the narcissist into a dangerous self-reflective mode where their whole personality is at risk of being disintegrated, and so they will disengage and remove themselves from the situation or go into a rage. From what I've seen, Onision is coasting on the fact that everyone will insult him exactly how he wants to be insulted, which means that if you insult him based on him being: a sociopath, having a "baby carrot", being a pedo, misinterpreting the law, etc. you are playing into his narcissistic antagonist fantasy. Chris Hansen gave Onision attention again, and Onision is desperately trying to antagonize Chris Hansen into continuing his farce of an investigation. No, Onision is not self aware about being a pedophile, a criminal or a bad, abusive person. Confronting him by saying "you are a bad person", "you are breaking the law", "you're abusive", will not make him realize that he's any of these things. The narcissist's existence is dependent on other people confirming it, which is why in Onision's books the main character has a guy following him and complimenting him. This is important for the narcissist, because it not only affirms that the narcissist is a person, but also that they are admired, loved, unique, funny, etc. The very reason for a narcissist to exist is this constant affirmation from other people that they truly are unique. This is called Narcissistic Supply. Ask the narcissist what he thinks other people think of him (pointed in a negative direction), and you're challenging the very existence of the narcissist.