U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.

"Literally evolved from slave catchers"

Really? Wait, what level? 'Cause mine's level 36 and he still hasn't evolved. Or do I have to trade him to an Israeli police dept. and then trade him back? I can't find any info in the Coppadex.

If you can't even use the word "literally" correctly, you're even more of an embarrassment than WITH the anime avatar and trans flags.
 
my question is though, lets say blm takes over america and theres no police or military what do they do about foreign incursions? hope they write us off as an economic wasteland?

I can only say the Antifa answer is something about "real communism' and "No countries" when I asked an antifa supporting person I know what about warlords and such he just ignored the question.
 
Again with the appeal to authority. It's very easy for you to sit there and wax superior as you backseat police. The fact that you're (allegedly) related to police means fuck all much like your cold diarrhea take. If this jogger wasn't a serial piece of shit with zero regard for anything/anyone but himself, none of this would have happened. But guess what, life happens. People have to make hard decisions. In this instance, the cops clearly understood this guy represented a clear threat and did what they had to do within their training. I respect that as it's a job I could never do. Apparently it's one you can't do either even though you're allegedly surrounded by gold-standard model police, which somehow affords you an expert opinion.

Who was clearly and immediately in danger that required the use of deadly force?

PROTIP: That's like the VERY first thing that your going to be asked by any lawyer worth a shit. Like I've already said at least twice, this wasn't a clearly bad shot but it clearly wasn't all good either.

This wasn't the cleanest shoot

This right here is my only point. It wasn't the cleanest shot. It deserves scrutiny. Personally, I couldn't find fault with a jury either way they decided... juries are fickle by nature. The cops that I know (OMG APPEAL TO AUTHORITY!) have all figuratively did the "under pressure / pull at the collar" thing.... which is what I tried to convey here... not an obvious case of OMG POLICE ARE MURDERERS!!! but not exactly a clean shot either. Love me or hate me, I call them as I see them. I personally think it was an overreaction ... maybe not to the point of manslaughter or any criminal conviction... but it's a sketchy shot. Maybe not from a cops point of view, but from a cops point of view as far as they think a prosecutor would look at it.
 
Are there any Atlanta riots? Or at least, happenings on stream?

Despite the lack of police it seems eerily quiet.

Also is the police walkout for just tonight, or will it be continuing?
 
Who was clearly and immediately in danger that required the use of deadly force?
the cop the guy is trying to taser
I'm going to assume one of his mall ninja buddies hid the knife afterwards so they could claim the shooting wasn't self defense.
could also be the police following their higher-ups and doing whatever they can to let antifa/blm run amok and nail anyone to the right to a cross as has been the trend since 2015
Are there any Atlanta riots? Or at least, happenings on stream?

Despite the lack of police it seems eerily quiet.

Also is the police walkout for just tonight, or will it be continuing?
the news knows better than to cover riots by now, but tbh I bet it's just hoodrats taking the opportunity to do what they normally do to each other and people near their communities but in higher numbers than usual.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Are there any Atlanta riots? Or at least, happenings on stream?

Despite the lack of police it seems eerily quiet.

Also is the police walkout for just tonight, or will it be continuing?
EDIT: Actually, this video might not be recent. No one seems to know when it was uploaded to TikTok.

nig.png



 
Good news on the cop front.

I have been talking to some gun instructors about the shoot and they have advised me that Massad Ayoob is disgusted at the charges the officers face. Arrangements are being made to get Massad to testify as an expert witness if this gets to trial.

In case some Twitter half-wit says Brooks lowered the TASER...well that dumb NIGGER Brooks raised the TASER and the officer drew his weapon and aimed. This is what the officer probably saw,

He drew and fired in about two seconds at night...the cop was scared (of being disabled by the TASER) and committed to using lethal force. Once the suspect raised the TASER his fate was sealed.
Front-Sight-Focus-300x228.jpg
 
If it was 1.1 second the cop was ridiculously fast. Here are shooters performing a Mozambuque drill.

Champion gun shootist Jim Zubiena performed a three shot drill in about 1.38 seconds. Once the pistol was raised and the front sight is on the target Brook's hand movements become very hard to see.

I was counting frames from the Taser flash to the frame where it looks like the bullets hit Brooks. 33 frames @ 30 fps = 1.1 seconds.

Of course, there was a bit more reaction time because his hand goes to his gun in the half second where Brooks raises his arm. Presumably, that Taser shot is the point where the cop makes the decision to shoot, even if he makes the decision to draw earlier, which is why I focused on that time frame. And I could be getting the impact/shooting frame wrong.

But even adding in extra time, the whole thing from threat to Brooks getting shot takes place within 2 seconds.
 
"They are a recent invention"
This motherfucker genuinely believes that the concept of law enforcers was just invented no more than 20 years ago.
"Recent" can mean anything from within the past 5 years to the past 200, depending on what suits the SJW's purpose. In this case police under the present name and organisation existed since the mid-19th century as a response to increased urbanisation, because the older system of town watches couldn't cut it anymore. Some dipshit noticed that slave patrolmen emerged at a similar time and did something kind of similar, and probably ended up getting re-hired as cops after slavery ended, so now it's a far-left meme that cops are modern patters, despite the fact that northern cities had invented cops at the same time as the South invented slave patrols.

Or maybe it spread because this song is rather catchy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKGNvo8WTrA (the comments section is also gold).
 
Shit, I don't know, the cops he attacked? The Wendy's drive thru near by?

He was fleeing the cops, he was not in any way an immediate threat to them. (I realize the taser was in play, but I am playing the role of the opposing lawyer). In the video footage it was clear he was running * away * from both the Wendy's itself and the cars in the drive through line. He appeared to be only trying to flee the police.

I'm not trying to troll you, honest to god on my mother's eyesight, I am only trying to convey how opposing lawyers would/will attack this cop. If he * clearly * wasn't trying to stop an * immediate * act of violence, the lawyer will have a field day. Please do not get me wrong, appeal to authority aside I have horror stories from the Detroit PD... Cops have horrifically shitty jobs if they are stuck in high crime areas. Now corrupt assholes always exist, but generally speaking, decent cops have to be borderline saints in an era of ubiquitous video footage. None of that changes the fact that ANY shooting in the back is going to be bad news for the cop.
 
He was fleeing the cops, he was not in any way an immediate threat to them. (I realize the taser was in play, but I am playing the role of the opposing lawyer). In the video footage it was clear he was running * away * from both the Wendy's itself and the cars in the drive through line. He appeared to be only trying to flee the police.

I'm not trying to troll you, honest to god on my mother's eyesight, I am only trying to convey how opposing lawyers would/will attack this cop. If he * clearly * wasn't trying to stop an * immediate * act of violence, the lawyer will have a field day. Please do not get me wrong, appeal to authority aside I have horror stories from the Detroit PD... Cops have horrifically shitty jobs if they are stuck in high crime areas. Now corrupt assholes always exist, but generally speaking, decent cops have to be borderline saints in an era of ubiquitous video footage. None of that changes the fact that ANY shooting in the back is going to be bad news for the cop.
I can move away from you and shoot a projectile at you at the same time you know.
 
He was fleeing the cops, he was not in any way an immediate threat to them. (I realize the taser was in play, but I am playing the role of the opposing lawyer). In the video footage it was clear he was running * away * from both the Wendy's itself and the cars in the drive through line. He appeared to be only trying to flee the police.

I'm not trying to troll you, honest to god on my mother's eyesight, I am only trying to convey how opposing lawyers would/will attack this cop. If he * clearly * wasn't trying to stop an * immediate * act of violence, the lawyer will have a field day. Please do not get me wrong, appeal to authority aside I have horror stories from the Detroit PD... Cops have horrifically shitty jobs if they are stuck in high crime areas. Now corrupt assholes always exist, but generally speaking, decent cops have to be borderline saints in an era of ubiquitous video footage. None of that changes the fact that ANY shooting in the back is going to be bad news for the cop.

Well, if we're talking about legal strategy, then all defense attorney's have to do is site GA's lethality classification for tazers and the DA who leveled the charges admittance a little over a week ago that a tazer can be deadly.
 
He was fleeing the cops, he was not in any way an immediate threat to them. (I realize the taser was in play, but I am playing the role of the opposing lawyer). In the video footage it was clear he was running * away * from both the Wendy's itself and the cars in the drive through line. He appeared to be only trying to flee the police.

I'm not trying to troll you, honest to god on my mother's eyesight, I am only trying to convey how opposing lawyers would/will attack this cop. If he * clearly * wasn't trying to stop an * immediate * act of violence, the lawyer will have a field day. Please do not get me wrong, appeal to authority aside I have horror stories from the Detroit PD... Cops have horrifically shitty jobs if they are stuck in high crime areas. Now corrupt assholes always exist, but generally speaking, decent cops have to be borderline saints in an era of ubiquitous video footage. None of that changes the fact that ANY shooting in the back is going to be bad news for the cop.
We already know that the lawyers and the DA are on the side of lawlessness, ironically.
 
He was fleeing the cops, he was not in any way an immediate threat to them. (I realize the taser was in play, but I am playing the role of the opposing lawyer).
Until the drunkard turned around, aimed, and shot at the cop with a multi-cartridge taser, he proved him self to be an active threat at that moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back