Sigyn
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2015
I believe that you're a psychopath. Subtly dropping hints that you're gonna shoot someone on the internet isn't normal or encourageable behavior.
Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory
- Thread starter Gene Parmesan
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
My dad had a good sense of humor, is what I mean.
Also, I find your interpretation of scripture to be alienating, as I have deficiencies in math skills and am often overwhelmed by numbers. Can you explain your ideas without using numbers?
Also if Justin Bieber turns out to be Kurt Cobain reincarnated I'm gonna convert to Satanism.
Sigyn
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2015
I have a feeling you've heard it a lot more than me, Brad. How's that numerology being recieved by your peers, by the way? Any plans for a new book?
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
Bradley, why do you have to act like such a wfny zhh? Oh, you don't know what that means? Well it was a supa-sekret code given to me by a skelington marine after he descended from atop a mountain where he was fighting terrorists with only his bony hands. True story. And if you don't believe me I'll just have to pass sentencing on you Bradley.
Except that part where it isn't.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2015
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2015
I know of one post he deleted because he made a mistake in it. I don't know why he didn't just edit it, maybe because editing it would be admitting he made a mistake?
As probably one of the worst offenders in terms of attacking him, I must humbly beg the pardon of both you and the rest of the forum. He ignores nearly all of my questions while insulting me, I was putting up with that. But when he kept hurling obscenities at the others here, I finally lost my temper and acted out. I am very sorry I did that, it was uncalled for, and I will try not to let it happen again.
But I refuse to apologize to Brad for anything I said after the way he has treated most of the people in this thread.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Everyone you will meet here does that. Chris did it, Robert Wayne Stiles does it, Andrew Dobson does it. Part of having this unique type of psyche is being a selective listener.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
People tend to get riled up when someone starts calling himself the literal reincarnation of Jesus Christ.
Rightly so IMO.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
Yea, we all know I am Jehova "Null" Christ.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
A
AP 297
Guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2014
Brad,
Ignoring the 5 or so weens who seem to forget what the forum's all about, do you have any recommended bands? And does helter skelter really have evil subliminal messages in it?
Ignoring the 5 or so weens who seem to forget what the forum's all about, do you have any recommended bands? And does helter skelter really have evil subliminal messages in it?
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2014
Did we ever hear about Brads conception? should be fairly easy to track his miraculous birth eh?
I realise you are not writing the sequel to star wars- that was clearly a star trek quote you ended on.
Christ never did anything inconsistent with the word that came before him yet you are going to directly contradict the word of God and add to it.
interestingly Christ never referred to God the father by name- you seem very keen on examining and naming God whenever you can. Why the change? You have not fulfilled any prophecy save perhaps Matthew 7:15 'Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves'.
This leads us on nicely to:
Matthew 7:16: Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
When Christ was on earth he performed many miracles but most startling was his power of command- he only had to command the dead to rise or the sick to be healed for it to be so. Your judgements on the other hand are utterly impotent. You can heal no sick and perform no miracles.
When Christ was last here he attracted crowds of thousands with his ministry. You have a single forum laughing at you. No one listens to you because there is no truth in what you say- to paraphrase the real Christ- your fruit is made of thorns.
there are a few things wrong with this: 1. numerology was only used in limited contexts in those languages not in debate and exhortation (which is what pauls epistles were). 2. the original language is of limited value: Christ gave his apostles the ability to speak in tongues specifically to spread it as far as possible. Mark 16:15 'And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.' Yet Paul make no mention of numerology in any of his epistles nor did he ever teach anyone about it. Christ enjoyed the title Rabbi when he was on Earth- I find it strange that you just told me to do some homework.
And then there's the weirdest thing
Matthew 11:27; 'All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.'
Christ claimed omniscience. He knew everything. You by your own admission clearly do not.
Christ was able to re butt, refute and utterly frustrate the accusations put on him. You on the other hand cannot.
Matthew 7:21 '
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.'
the real christ only had to command- John 11:43 ' And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.
44 And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.'
how is it that i can back up my words with bible quotes and yet you have to make up number games that don't prove anything? Scholars were amazed with the wisdom of Christ at a young age- I am in my early 20s and running rings round you.
'
James 1:26 - If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion [is] vain.
Christ managed not to insult anyone during his time on earth. t
and a few versus later at Rv 22:18 'For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:'
You don't make me angry Brad, but you aren't any kind of Christ- plenty people find comfort and happiness in religion, I'm sorry that you've found whatever madness this is. Feel free to pm me if you want to talk theology in private.
I know all about getting carried away in a thread as you perhaps remember!
don't worry about it- it gets easier to relax and enjoy the madness!
I realise you are not writing the sequel to star wars- that was clearly a star trek quote you ended on.
Christ never did anything inconsistent with the word that came before him yet you are going to directly contradict the word of God and add to it.
interestingly Christ never referred to God the father by name- you seem very keen on examining and naming God whenever you can. Why the change? You have not fulfilled any prophecy save perhaps Matthew 7:15 'Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves'.
This leads us on nicely to:
Matthew 7:16: Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?
When Christ was on earth he performed many miracles but most startling was his power of command- he only had to command the dead to rise or the sick to be healed for it to be so. Your judgements on the other hand are utterly impotent. You can heal no sick and perform no miracles.
When Christ was last here he attracted crowds of thousands with his ministry. You have a single forum laughing at you. No one listens to you because there is no truth in what you say- to paraphrase the real Christ- your fruit is made of thorns.
there are a few things wrong with this: 1. numerology was only used in limited contexts in those languages not in debate and exhortation (which is what pauls epistles were). 2. the original language is of limited value: Christ gave his apostles the ability to speak in tongues specifically to spread it as far as possible. Mark 16:15 'And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.' Yet Paul make no mention of numerology in any of his epistles nor did he ever teach anyone about it. Christ enjoyed the title Rabbi when he was on Earth- I find it strange that you just told me to do some homework.
And then there's the weirdest thing
Matthew 11:27; 'All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.'
Christ claimed omniscience. He knew everything. You by your own admission clearly do not.
Christ was able to re butt, refute and utterly frustrate the accusations put on him. You on the other hand cannot.
Matthew 7:21 '
Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?
23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.'
the real christ only had to command- John 11:43 ' And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.
44 And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.'
how is it that i can back up my words with bible quotes and yet you have to make up number games that don't prove anything? Scholars were amazed with the wisdom of Christ at a young age- I am in my early 20s and running rings round you.
'
James 1:26 - If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion [is] vain.
Christ managed not to insult anyone during his time on earth. t
and a few versus later at Rv 22:18 'For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:'
You don't make me angry Brad, but you aren't any kind of Christ- plenty people find comfort and happiness in religion, I'm sorry that you've found whatever madness this is. Feel free to pm me if you want to talk theology in private.
I know all about getting carried away in a thread as you perhaps remember!
don't worry about it- it gets easier to relax and enjoy the madness!
Picklechu
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
I thought of another thing that I'm curious about @Brad Watson_Miami. How can you give someone a "Fail F" if their case hasn't been completely reviewed? That seems kind of illogical to me.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2015
So I decided I would do what Brad has been asking all of us to do and visited one of his websites, specifically 7seals,blogspot.com. I found it to be rather unsubstantial (what? no one's surprised?) though I do recommend it to anyone here with a science background, as some of his conclusions on Einstein's theories and his explanation of how unified string theory fits into his insane GOD=7_4 "logarithm" is pretty amusing.
A few choice quotes:
"Advanced technology and wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges) - "star gates" - provide interuniversal travel. Einstein was wrong re: one eternal steady-state universe and we as observers cancel out any potential "many worlds of quantum mechanics" wrongly promoted by some as existing within the multiverse. Darwinism has been tweaked to include discoveries since 1859 proving GOD-guided/God-incarnate evolution."
"Earthlings' 'next-door neighbors' - the Planet Nestor & Nestlings - are introduced, as is proof of Biblical extraterrestrial intervention, i.e. Gen 6:4, "Nefilem64"
Let me toss in a couple of Biblical notes here. First Genesis 6:4 -- "6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."
Some notes about this courtesy of bibletools.com -- "Some maintain that these verses assert that angels married women before the Flood and engendered a race of giants. This idea sounds like the sub-plot of a science fiction story! But can it be the truth? Angels cannot cohabit nor reproduce with women. Angels are spirit beings (Hebrews 1:13-14). Women are human beings. Angels and women, then, are two different kinds of being. Kind reproduces after kind, and different species cannot breed. God says, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh." He is speaking of fleshly mankind here, not angels. Although it is true that the children of these couples were "mighty," like their parents, they were still only human."
Finally, for those of you confused about the "Nefilem" (I think Brad is assuming they were aliens), another quick quote from bibletools.com -- ""Giants" is the Hebrew word nephilim, which has little or nothing to do with being tall and muscular but refers to cultural leadership. God is describing the culture immediately before the Flood. Nephilim has to be seen in that context. These Nephilim - giants not in size but in influence - were establishing evil, deceitful, violent, and enslaving leadership. They were "men of renown," which literally means they were men of name. In other words, they had a reputation, but that term is used in a derogatory sense. These were not good characters."
One more quote from Brad and I'll let you all go, but I saved the best for last -- his explanation of unified string theory:
"Many theoretical physicists refer to string theory/M-theory (supersymmetric/superstring/ supergravity theories) as the "theory of everything" (TOE) since it combines the four forces of nature (gravity, electromagnetism, strong nuclear & weak nuclear), as well as combining quantum mechanics (the very small) and relativity (the very BIG) into one "unified field theory" which Einstein sought for 40 years! An analysis of time balances and completes M-theory. Much indirect observational evidence is provided that proves its existence and it is used to predict Earth analogs! But this TOE actually comes 'under the umbrella' of GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4."
See? I told you it was the best. My favorite phrase out of all he wrote is "Much indirect observational evidence..." HUH??????
Two more quick things: 1. I read his complete profile about all of his scientific background -- but he never says what college he went to. 2. How many times have we seen this? "Genasis74 " You would think God would know how to spell Genesis -- but then it wouldn't add up to 74!
A few choice quotes:
"Advanced technology and wormholes (Einstein-Rosen bridges) - "star gates" - provide interuniversal travel. Einstein was wrong re: one eternal steady-state universe and we as observers cancel out any potential "many worlds of quantum mechanics" wrongly promoted by some as existing within the multiverse. Darwinism has been tweaked to include discoveries since 1859 proving GOD-guided/God-incarnate evolution."
"Earthlings' 'next-door neighbors' - the Planet Nestor & Nestlings - are introduced, as is proof of Biblical extraterrestrial intervention, i.e. Gen 6:4, "Nefilem64"
Let me toss in a couple of Biblical notes here. First Genesis 6:4 -- "6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."
Some notes about this courtesy of bibletools.com -- "Some maintain that these verses assert that angels married women before the Flood and engendered a race of giants. This idea sounds like the sub-plot of a science fiction story! But can it be the truth? Angels cannot cohabit nor reproduce with women. Angels are spirit beings (Hebrews 1:13-14). Women are human beings. Angels and women, then, are two different kinds of being. Kind reproduces after kind, and different species cannot breed. God says, "My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, for he is indeed flesh." He is speaking of fleshly mankind here, not angels. Although it is true that the children of these couples were "mighty," like their parents, they were still only human."
Finally, for those of you confused about the "Nefilem" (I think Brad is assuming they were aliens), another quick quote from bibletools.com -- ""Giants" is the Hebrew word nephilim, which has little or nothing to do with being tall and muscular but refers to cultural leadership. God is describing the culture immediately before the Flood. Nephilim has to be seen in that context. These Nephilim - giants not in size but in influence - were establishing evil, deceitful, violent, and enslaving leadership. They were "men of renown," which literally means they were men of name. In other words, they had a reputation, but that term is used in a derogatory sense. These were not good characters."
One more quote from Brad and I'll let you all go, but I saved the best for last -- his explanation of unified string theory:
"Many theoretical physicists refer to string theory/M-theory (supersymmetric/superstring/ supergravity theories) as the "theory of everything" (TOE) since it combines the four forces of nature (gravity, electromagnetism, strong nuclear & weak nuclear), as well as combining quantum mechanics (the very small) and relativity (the very BIG) into one "unified field theory" which Einstein sought for 40 years! An analysis of time balances and completes M-theory. Much indirect observational evidence is provided that proves its existence and it is used to predict Earth analogs! But this TOE actually comes 'under the umbrella' of GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4."
See? I told you it was the best. My favorite phrase out of all he wrote is "Much indirect observational evidence..." HUH??????
Two more quick things: 1. I read his complete profile about all of his scientific background -- but he never says what college he went to. 2. How many times have we seen this? "Genasis74 " You would think God would know how to spell Genesis -- but then it wouldn't add up to 74!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2014
The important thing to remember here is that this is not the real Brad Watson, percussionist from Miami.
The idiot posting here is a crazy person who is obsessed with Brad Watson and is trying to ruin his reputation. Brad's been stalked by this maniac (last name Jenkins) for many years. The police are well aware of Jenkins and his antics.
The real Brad Watson is a very pleasant and talented person. He's aware of this forum but can't be bothered to reply to it.
The idiot posting here is a crazy person who is obsessed with Brad Watson and is trying to ruin his reputation. Brad's been stalked by this maniac (last name Jenkins) for many years. The police are well aware of Jenkins and his antics.
The real Brad Watson is a very pleasant and talented person. He's aware of this forum but can't be bothered to reply to it.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
Do you have any sort of interaction between them to share with the class? Because holy lol I wanna read it!
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2015
This would explain why he doesn't answer a lot of personal questions.
Still and all, I thought this guy was verified as the real deal. If not then I feel very sorry for the real Brad Watson, because this guy went to the trouble of creating seven massive blogs in Brad's name.
Still, even if this is a fake Brad Watson, I will enjoy blowing large holes through this nut's theories once I get the book he recommended.
Maybe we could change this thread to "The Stalker Who Pretends to Be Brad Watson"?
Still and all, I thought this guy was verified as the real deal. If not then I feel very sorry for the real Brad Watson, because this guy went to the trouble of creating seven massive blogs in Brad's name.
Still, even if this is a fake Brad Watson, I will enjoy blowing large holes through this nut's theories once I get the book he recommended.
Maybe we could change this thread to "The Stalker Who Pretends to Be Brad Watson"?
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2014
Dude, how often do you not answer my questions? You think somehow I don't 'like' that question?
Probably around 6 as well, I guess. It's not like I made a mental note of it. It didn't impress me. Of the memorable moments of my life? Reading the 10 Commandments for the first time isn't.
Might as well ask if I remember the first time I had McDonalds then get all "Don't wait for the translation, just answer the question!" like you just laid down a master stroke.
In fairness it's like watching the Fatalities in the original Mortal Kombat. Exciting and new, at first, then you just seen the same thing over and over... You will not be reincarnated for X years and reborn under very^Y hellish circumstances.
Man, if he was a Buddhist he could sentence Frank Rizzo to the 2nd Frozen Hell where the cold would cause blisters that burst and fester. I could be sent to The Hell of The Black Thread where I'm sliced into pieces for 1.2 billion years.
And Null.... You, the reason we are here. You would go to the hell known as 'The Uninterrupted". The bottom most level of traitors and deceivers.
Nope. His God Complex revolves around a, comparatively, dull god.
Last edited by a moderator: