Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[bosssauce]

For International Non-Binary Day, I decided to check up on the ur-non-binary, Alok V. Menon. (As an aside, he's such an abject Rat King careercow, I'm surprised he (functionally) doesn't have a thread here.)

On this holiest of days, Alok is busy fighting for trans and gender non-conforming lives by desperately shilling his "accessible" book "for all ages" full of "crucial information," such as how being non-binary is totally not a made up identity.

View attachment 1449267View attachment 1449268View attachment 1449269

He also blesses us with 10 non-binary IG artistes to help us expand our woefully binary minds.

View attachment 1449273

So who are these androgynous beauties men in dresses?

Spoiler

View attachment 1449276View attachment 1449277View attachment 1449278View attachment 1449280View attachment 1449281View attachment 1449282View attachment 1449283View attachment 1449284View attachment 1449285View attachment 1449286

I, for one, have learned a lot.

Damn, not a single actual woman in that lineup. Interesting, but not surprising.

 

[soft breathing]

Credit where credit is due - stolen from here:

View attachment 1450050

 

[NoReturn]

For International Non-Binary Day, I decided to check up on the ur-non-binary, Alok V. Menon. (As an aside, he's such an abject Rat King careercow, I'm surprised he (functionally) doesn't have a thread here.)

On this holiest of days, Alok is busy fighting for trans and gender non-conforming lives by desperately shilling his "accessible" book "for all ages" full of "crucial information," such as how being non-binary is totally not a made up identity.

View attachment 1449267View attachment 1449268View attachment 1449269

He also blesses us with 10 non-binary IG artistes to help us expand our woefully binary minds.

View attachment 1449273

So who are these androgynous beauties men in dresses?

Spoiler

View attachment 1449276View attachment 1449277View attachment 1449278View attachment 1449280View attachment 1449281View attachment 1449282View attachment 1449283View attachment 1449284View attachment 1449285View attachment 1449286

I, for one, have learned a lot.

Jesus Christ how horrifying. Most of them look like things that would scare children. With the exception of the Mexican, who looks like a boring ol' muxe but that's not special enough to be in the nonbinary club.

 

[Da Grim Reaper]

https://www.reddit.com/r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns/comments/hrf379/happy_nonbinary_day_found_this_meme_on_a_friends/

View attachment 1449738
Happy international day Kiwis!

I fucking love speaking a language that is heavily gender based, these little shits can either:
- Speak gibberish that nobody understands
- Accidentally calling themselves male or female without even realizing

 

[Criticallacitirc]

Damn, not a single actual woman in that lineup. Interesting, but not surprising.

Because to them non-binary means wearing the clothes of the opposite sex. So basically like 85% of women could claim to be non-binary based on the levels of gender nonconforming these trolls do. Maybe cops can get some sympathy from the woke crowd by declaring all female officers now non-binary.

 

[Lyre]

View attachment 1450054

Credit where credit is due - stolen from here:

We are truly in the worst timeline where children can be taken from their (presumably sane and loving) families because they refuse to lean into their children's delusional cult learnings and mutilate their bodies with hormone blockers and surgeries.
They're not even old enough to grow underarm hair and we're supposed to believe they can choose, on their own, of sound mind that they're actually the opposite sex and need a lifetime of drugs and surgery.
Horrifying.
But mostly infuriating.
Canada over here trying to really match or surpass that mythical 41% a decade or two from now it seems.

Edit: spelling, grammar

 

[Corn Flakes]

We are truly in the worst timeline where children can be taken from their (presumably sane and loving) families because they refuse to lean into their children's delusional cult learnings and mutilate their bodies with hormone blockers and surgeries.
They're not even old enough to grow underarm hair and we're supposed to believe they can choose, on their own, of sound mind that they're actually the opposite sex and need a lifetime of drugs and surgery.
Horrifying.
But mostly infuriating.
Canada over here trying to really match or surpass that mythical 41% a decade or two from now it seems.

Edit: spelling, grammar

Hopefully this will result in better parenting. Pay attention and be present so your kids don't even up swallowed up by the troon gendercult!

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

We are truly in the worst timeline where children can be taken from their (presumably sane and loving) families because they refuse to lean into their children's delusional cult learnings and mutilate their bodies with hormone blockers and surgeries.
They're not even old enough to grow underarm hair and we're supposed to believe they can choose, on their own, of sound mind that they're actually the opposite sex and need a lifetime of drugs and surgery.
Horrifying.
But mostly infuriating.
Canada over here trying to really match or surpass that mythical 41% a decade or two from now it seems.

Edit: spelling, grammar

Oh, c'mon, this one is obvious. What happens to those kids that get plucked from their parents - where do they go?

If you guessed 'into the laps of rich pedophiles,' then congrats! You're not a moron. If this isn't just shonky reporting based on that article, this is going to create a pipeline into the laps of sex predators, pedophiles or not.

Rip the kids away from their parents, shove them into a 'home' where they're likely abused or neglected affecting lots of brain problems, and you've got prime candidates to be browbeaten into the normal social amalgations that rob people of their 20s for the benefit of sex pests that this thread details in fine, fine form.

I'm personally not necessarily opposed to having some kind of resource where children being genuinely abused and tortured by their parents have a means to get out, but I think it's transparently obvious that this isn't what's being suggested here. "No, Tommy, you are not allowed to cut off your dick" is a little different from the satanic panic parenting style

 

[Frances Kiwi Farmer]

Damn, not a single actual woman in that lineup. Interesting, but not surprising.

I know, I was surprised that Alok didn't even put one "AFAB" person in his lineup, but I guess I shouldn't have been. Not to go full TERF, but these men envy and loathe women so deeply that their identities are contingent on them denying that women (not as gender identity BS, they're obv on board with that, but as the material reality of having a female body) even exist. The source of the envy in pretty clear in the typical AGP troon, but I assume in Alok and his ilk, it's more along the lines of "it's so unfair that hot straight men want to have sex with people with vaginas," as if that's the only reason he can't get laid lol.

Alok in particular seethes on this point, though. This FB post by him is old AF and I'm sure has been posted here before, but it's one of my favorites by him and really captures the essence of troon fury, imo.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CgfAb97WQAAbtCC.jpg

 

[Aviva's Biotech-Breakdown]

I know, I was surprised that Alok didn't even put one "AFAB" person in his lineup, but I guess I shouldn't have been. Not to go full TERF, but these men envy and loathe women so deeply that their identities are contingent on them denying that women (not as gender identity BS, they're obv on board with that, but as the material reality of having a female body) even exist. The source of the envy in pretty clear in the typical AGP troon, but I assume in Alok and his ilk, it's more along the lines of "it's so unfair that hot straight men want to have sex with people with vaginas," as if that's the only reason he can't get laid lol.

Alok in particular seethes on this point, though. This FB post by him is old AF and I'm sure has been posted here before, but it's one of my favorites by him and really captures the essence of troon fury, imo.

View attachment 1450100

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CgfAb97WQAAbtCC.jpg

Can you please explain to me what he is trying to get at because I can't for the life of me understand what sentiment he's trying to express here.

 

[Frances Kiwi Farmer]

Can you please explain to me what he is trying to get at because I can't for the life of me understand what sentiment he's trying to express here.

Something along the lines of, "Stop complaining that troons are grooming your children into destroying their bodies and minds for their own adult validation, because little girls are perverts anyway who want to be molested and I know that because I was totally a little girl."

Edit: More seriously, I think he's trying to argue that when people raise concerns that the trans rights movement is, either intentionally or unintentionally, creating loopholes around child safeguarding that may benefit predators (who may or may not "actually" be trans, whatever the fuck that means), those people are simply using trans people as a scapegoat for their cultural anxieties around maintaining the purity of children, specifically the purity of girls. Instead of arguing, as any troon with even an ounce of self-awareness would, that the goals of the trans movement do not weaken child safeguarding norms, instead he picks up the pedo apologist mantle by saying that it's wrong to think that young children are "perfect victims" and that little girls in particular can be "queer, trans, kinky, deviant, kind, mean, beautiful, ugly, tremendous, and peculiar" and that "everyone is capable of receiving and enacting violence, including little girls." Which he knows, because he's "been a cute little girl."

Alok is sick as shit, I can't help but get a little MOTI given that he has a fairly large online following.

 

[Next Task]

Alok in particular seethes on this point, though.

Wasn't he also the one who wrote an article in which he tried to pressure his male friends into not only fucking him, but also playing him for the privilege, under the guise of 'they say they support sex workers, so that means they have to be willing to have sex with me and pay me for it or they're hypocrites!'?

But it's not a fetish and it's not about pressuring people for sex using moral condemnation as a weapon...

 

[Mariposa Electrique]

For International Non-Binary Day, I decided to check up on the ur-non-binary, Alok V. Menon. (As an aside, he's such an abject Rat King careercow, I'm surprised he (functionally) doesn't have a thread here.)

On this holiest of days, Alok is busy fighting for trans and gender non-conforming lives by desperately shilling his "accessible" book "for all ages" full of "crucial information," such as how being non-binary is totally not a made up identity.

View attachment 1449267View attachment 1449268View attachment 1449269

He also blesses us with 10 non-binary IG artistes to help us expand our woefully binary minds.

View attachment 1449273

So who are these androgynous beauties men in dresses?

Spoiler

View attachment 1449276View attachment 1449277View attachment 1449278View attachment 1449280View attachment 1449281View attachment 1449282View attachment 1449283View attachment 1449284View attachment 1449285View attachment 1449286

I, for one, have learned a lot.

#3 looks like Dhalsim from Streetfighter. Talk about a Yoga Flamer!

 

[Syntaxion]

Something along the lines of, "Stop complaining that troons are grooming your children into destroying their bodies and minds for their own adult validation, because little girls are perverts anyway who want to be molested and I know that because I was totally a little girl."

Edit: More seriously, I think he's trying to argue that when people raise concerns that the trans rights movement is, either intentionally or unintentionally, creating loopholes around child safeguarding that may benefit predators (who may or may not "actually" be trans, whatever the fuck that means), those people are simply using trans people as a scapegoat for their cultural anxieties around maintaining the purity of children, specifically the purity of girls. Instead of arguing, as any troon with even an ounce of self-awareness would, that the goals of the trans movement do not weaken child safeguarding norms, instead he picks up the pedo apologist mantle by saying that it's wrong to think that young children are "perfect victims" and that little girls in particular can be "queer, trans, kinky, deviant, kind, mean, beautiful, ugly, tremendous, and peculiar" and that "everyone is capable of receiving and enacting violence, including little girls." Which he knows, because he's "been a cute little girl."

Alok is sick as shit, I can't help but get a little MOTI given that he has a fairly large online following.

Wasn't he one of the three guys in the "my gender non-comfirming friends can't get laid" article? Because if so, at least that means he's a loser who won't be getting children anytime soon.
What a sick mfer

 

[Governor Jeb Bush]

My micro penis throbs and my gut makes noises when I see a Troon with C cup neo breasts

 

[Bani]

The left looks through histories of various cultures and civilizations throughout history and says "oh this one had some gays" or "this one had some men in dresses" or "this one believed in a third gender", then they gather all these instances together and try to claim that all civilizations had gays, men in dresses and multiple genders, etc. (when in actuality they only had one of those at most)

All civilizations do have same-sex couplings; it's not a cultural thing like transgenderism. This isnt because it's part of civilization, but because it's just a thing a certain percentage of all human beings do. The key here is that cultures have different responses to homosexuality. Some don't care, others are avidly against it.

Not all cultures have a label for being exclusively interested in the same sex, though. That's a relatively new thing; in the past it was just the behavior that was labeled, not the identity of the person.

 

[Corn Flakes]

Not all cultures have a label for being exclusively interested in the same sex, though. That's a relatively new thing; in the past it was just the behavior that was labeled, not the identity of the person.

To wit, from the grafitti from Pompeii:

• Secundus likes to screw boys.
• Weep, you girls. My penis has given you up. Now it penetrates men's behinds. Goodbye, wondrous femininity!
• I have buggered men.

None of these say "Secundus is gay!" or "I'm gay!". Instead, they describe the actions. At most men who were attracted to other men were either degenerates (if they were catching) or weird (if they were pitching).

 

[OttoWest]

Wasn't he one of the three guys in the "my gender non-comfirming friends can't get laid" article? Because if so, at least that means he's a loser who won't be getting children anytime soon.
What a sick mfer

Yes. The man that wrote the article is Mark “Meredith” Talusan, an albino Filipino troon. The two friends he was referring to were Alok and Jacob Tobia.

 

[Chromeo]

Yes. The man that wrote the article is Mark “Meredith” Talusan, an albino Filipino troon. The two friends he was referring to were Alok and Jacob Tobia.

View attachment 1450202

Blaire White just posted a video about that article today.

 

[Yangon]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, none of those 'non-binary' identities around the world rely on self-identification. No one just decides one day they're a hijra, they're a hijra because society decides they're a hijra. They can even have different pronouns; it's not that unusual - Japanese has different pronouns when you want to be polite and when you want to be rude, language does various things. The main difference is that it arises naturally as a consensus of a society. No one in India just one day decided they're not a man but some other category and demanded that everyone rework the entire grammar of their language or it's a hate crime.
And, as mentioned, those third genders are usually very backward things, like labeling effeminate men not manly enough to be men, etc. But in year of our lord 2020 when a 4-year-old boy likes pink things he's actually a girl and teenage girls with short hair are enbies, so it's not that different.