Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 62 50.8%
  • 1

    Votes: 32 26.2%
  • >1

    Votes: 28 23.0%

  • Total voters
    122
I'm sure another fucking tweet defending children doing sexually provocative things won't add fuel to the fire.
View attachment 1616567

Dax's fellow defenders of child sexual exploitation are definitely more likely than not to be stridently pro lockdown. But Dax adheres to that childishly narcissistic rule of lolcow logic which makes the cow believe that anyone who is against him on one thing is against him on everything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crystal Golem
Can we get a timestamp?
Try around 2:05. He happily hosts a pedophile defending the rape of a 14 year old girl being broadcast on PornHub. It goes on and on, and filled me with an urge to hang these fucking child rapists from cranes. I will excerpt the portion in which Mr. Herrera defends raping children later.

The claims of this pedophile are just accepted on face value. Because that's what a libertarian, a pedophile, a child molester, will do. Just accept.

You can't tolerate lolicons. Anyone who defends people who just 'happen' to enjoy cartoons of a preteen girl being raped will naturally be just fine with the real thing too.
 
224 (the September 15th episode, I'm behind) was a better episode than most lately, largely due to Baked Alaska and Chaggit being good guests.

Timestamps for episode 224:

(Blue text is my personal commentary)

44:18 Dick: (spoken meekly) "A lot of stuff is stuff I swore I wouldn't talk about... which I'm not gonna do." (what?)

51:37 Caller complains about the West Virginia Walmart farting guy's call from a few episodes ago (Dick had a guy who called in, a medicated schizophrenic suffering from Chron's disease, who talked about flirting with girls at Walmart, managing to get one's number, while upsetting her dad in the process. He obnoxiously chewed a lot throughout the entire call as a nervous tick. Unfortunately, by the standard of the show lately, he really wasn't that bad of a guest by comparison)

1:17:08 Baked Alaska: "I gotta ask you, because I see all this controvery going on. What is with you defending the Netflix show "Cuties"?" Dick: "OH NO WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT IT! WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT IT! WE'LL TALK ABOUT IT AT THE END!" Baked: "You promise?" Dick: "Yes, we'll talk about it at the end so people can skip it" Baked: "Don't avoid it." Dick: "I won't avoid it."

1:26:51 Chaggit: "Are you gonna vote for him again?" Dick "Trump? Of COURSE!"

1:27:51 Dick talks briefly about not believing in God, but appreciating Christian values

1:30:08 Baked Alaska: "I have screenshots of Porsalin trying to sabotage my relationship with Ashton"

1:31:00 Baked Alaska mentioned how Porsalin doxxed his parents, who had never been shown before (I don't follow Baked Alaska nor Porsalin, I never watched the Baked Alaska documentary, so I have no say in this matter)

1:35:24 Dick mentions the resurgence of Christianity, and Baked brings up all the anti-family propaganda, like Cuties, and Dick says "All right, all right, all right, settle down." (I'm glad people on the show are standing up to Dick for that shit, because seriously, what the fuck)

1:49:18 Dick: "I think I have- I see more in line with Antifa than the Republicans!" ((:_()

1:52:00 Dick: "I would probably have more in common with a for-real communist than somebody who's gonna vote for Biden."

1:55:47 Dick: "That's been the worst part of quarantine, I'll start (talking to myself) and 80's Girl is in the other room and (I'll think) like, "ahh fuck, I hope I didn't say something dumb"

2:23:28 Dick: "You wanna talk about Cuties now?"

---

And this is where I ended the episode for the time being, I figured I'd listen to it through and see what Dick had to say but a new one debuted and I just don't have the fortitude to hear someone I've respected for years dig himself deeper and deeper into a lolcow hole and rot away all respect I ever had for him. If Dick keeps this shit up, I just won't listen to the show anymore. I don't listen to shit that makes me angry. But feel free to listen from that timestamp and let us know what went down.
 
Last edited:
He's literally throwing in with weird online freaks who are defending the actual rape of 14 year old girls posted to PornHub.

The guest claimed the woman was lying about it for attention, if my goldfish memory is correct. Do we have any proof of her claims or is this just a "he said she said" now?
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: BadTakeCrucifier
Wow, Episode 225 was very 'interesting'. Dick is no longer just supporting lolicons who jack off to child porn. He's literally throwing in with weird online freaks who are defending the actual rape of 14 year old girls posted to PornHub.

Apparently, if you're a fourteen year old girl raped by Dick's pedo friends, you have to put your full name out there to be targeted by Dick's pedo buddies. If you try to be private about being raped by libertarians and other pedophiles, you're part of the Christian Karen squad.
https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-51391981
According to the storyteller on the show it was a lie. "The [BBC] article is just her story. There's no corroboration." The guy also claims PornHub denies the videos ever existed. These are important factors to include.
 
Last edited:
According to the storyteller on the show it was a lie. Women will lie about videos being underage or "revenge porn" to attempt to remove them off of websites like pornhub.
"The [BBC] article is just her story. There's no corroboration."

Cassandra Fairbanks claims nudes of her that get posted was when she was underage to get them removed.
Depends on the ethnicity of the accused, tbh. Minorities are 100% more likely to actually commit rape than whites. Whites are 100% more likely to be falsely accused. Seeing as though it's britain, if the accused is muslim he's obviously guilty. If he's white I'm tapping (X).
 
Depends on the ethnicity of the accused, tbh. Minorities are 100% more likely to actually commit rape than whites. Whites are 100% more likely to be falsely accused. Seeing as though it's britain, if the accused is muslim he's obviously guilty. If he's white I'm tapping (X).
According to the guy the woman says the rapists got off easy because they were both white and hired a good lawyer and charged got both charged as juveniles despite being adults.

The guy made a long video detailing he story. It was removed from yt for "harrassment and bullying."

@3119967d0c don't just believe shit because you hate Dick. The story is more complex than you portrayed it.
 
Last edited:
The guy made a long video detailing he story. It was removed from yt for "harrassment and bullying."

Dano relies too much on comparing this to what Smollett did. However, having all of the people (allegedly) involved in this as well as Rose's injuries laid out alongside her various tweets where she admits to lying about details to "protect herself" casts doubt on her claims. Who knows?
 
Also keep in mind the 1st time NP2 was shut down it was for "online gambling" which everyone automatically assumed was the wrong think issue, but given what we learned about Dax may be more valid than we thought.

The thing is Dax isn't some hero dissident type. All his takes are well within LA mainstream opinion, especially recently. It seems much more likely NP2 got nuked for breaking the rules of financial institutions than anything else.

Then again Vordrak, who claimed credit for taking down NP2 reckons it was because he convinced Mastercard it was funding terrorism, i.e. us

http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=7346
https://archive.vn/wAIBI

Joshua Conner Moon is a neo-Nazi paedophile and a stalker who runs websites facilitating and promoting stalking, terrorism and paedophilia. Successful businesses do not fund stalking, terrorism and paedophilia because those things are illegal. Funding them is by definition, money laundering. Dick needs to think very carefully about allowing Josh anywhere near his businesses.

Every time a bank terminates service to a merchant for breach of terms they add the merchant and associated persons to what is known as the joint, VISA / MasterCard Terminated Merchant File (TMF) and MATCH list. There may also be other lists. This can make it very hard to obtain banking services and card processing services anywhere. Personal current accounts (what Americans call ‘checking accounts’) can suddenly be terminated. Personal cards can be cancelled without warning.

I think he's wrong about this, and also somewhat insane. Money laundering is taking dirty money from crime and turning into clean money which can be used openly. He's saying we're a bunch of neo-Nazi terrorist stalkers, some of which is untrue and then using that to get MasterCard to fuck with any way of people funding the site.

Next episode of the Dick Show will be "Look guys, someone tried to kill my precious troon. Digi dindu nuffin wrong, he's a strong independent women and those fuckers at KarenFarms are taking this pedo shit too far."

If he's smart he'll play that clip of PPP saying 'God forbid someones turns up with a weapon'.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/conra...e-pro-crastinators-podcast.35301/post-7415218

I bet he'll say 'Even though I'm a free speech absolutist this is incitement' even though it actually isn't.
 
Last edited:
The thing is Dax isn't some hero dissident type. All his takes are well within LA mainstream opinion, especially recently. It seems much more likely NP2 got nuked for breaking the rules of financial institutions than anything else.

Then again Vordrak, who claimed credit for taking down NP2 reckons it was because he convinced Mastercard it was funding terrorism, i.e. us

http://matthewhopkinsnews.com/?p=7346
https://archive.vn/wAIBI
True, but Vordrak did not take down NP2 the first time when it was taken down for online gambling. That was 100% the call of chase bank and if I'm not mistaken Dax also had issues at Bank of America after that.
Getting nuked for breaking the rules of financial institutions seems the most likely given what a joke the site was, and while Vodrak claims the terrorism stuff (and I'm sure he made those claims and meant them), I believe he probably used the legal loopholes of how it was fucking up and also threw in those claims as well otherwise why is Joosh able to make money without any issues and Dax still on a Match list (allegedly)? I think money laundering is a legit possibility given his engagement going down but the money going up.

Money laundering is taking dirty money from crime and turning into clean money which can be used openly.
Doesn't necessarily have to be from a crime, but we'd be at a semantic argument there. I think Dax is trying to avoid taxes on the appreciation of crypto as well as hide what he has from the IRS, so he's laundering the money through a tumbler and cashing out in dollars on fake accounts. Technically not money from a crime as opposed to money he is concealing the origin of.

I bet he'll say 'Even though I'm a free speech absolutist this is incitement' even though it actually isn't.
yup and the solution will be to give Dax and Digi money cause that will fix it.
Funny, these were never incitements when they happened to Maddox.
If I am not mistaken didn't PPP say this after the incident happened?
 
"this person just hates me because he's simping for this girl and wants to fuck her" I feel like I've heard this logic before somewhere....

View attachment 1622497
Yeah having sex with adult women is fucking awful, I agree. Also what kind of an incel supports rape victim activists like Rose Kalemba? So cringe. REAL MEN SUPPORT LOLI HENTAI!

Seriously though, even if the story was "fake" how fucking weird is it to die on this hill of being critical of people who claim they were raped, while defending loli rape hentai and militantly defending Cuties?


EDIT: For anyone doubting the truth of the Kalemba story, let me tell you how fucked up this actually is. There's a legal and activist group called "Trafficking Hub" which advocates for rape and human trafficking victims who had their rape videos made into "porn" and shared on PornHub (which is including actual pre-pubescent children, tragically). Rose Kalemba is only one case. There is another famous recent case of another 15 year old girl who was kidnapped, missing, and to the horror of everyone was discovered in illegal CP on pornhub and rescued.

Pornhub is shit at taking down videos reported as rape. Also, there is a documented dark side to PornHub of people generally using it to re-host rape/torture videos that come from sites like motherless, the dark web, etc. Obviously, once it's online, it's almost impossible to completely erase. Pornhub itself actually doesn't verify anyone, anyone can upload anything anonymously. You can read up on the dozens of confirmed cases of rape videos being hosted by them for yourself. There is also a further issue like hundreds of suspected rape videos, or "victim not identified" unknown cases that pretty much have all the tells of an actual rape.

I've been following Trafficking Hub and Exodus Cry for a couple of years. These stories aren't faked and anyone arguing they are is extremely suspicious. People have actually gotten some extremely disturbing videos taken down and TraffickingHub is one of the few groups that advocates for victims of sex trafficking who had their rape videos mirrored on porn sites.

So, all that said, this is what Dax and friends are making fun of. Actual rape. Literal human trafficking. Tell me again why anyone supports these guys?

Links for reading:
 
Last edited:
Dick doesn't really attack the woman. He attacks the people telling him he shouldn't have the guy on. Some of you are either dumb or haven't actually listened to the episode.
He sure does have a consistent record of giving a platform to the most absolute degenerate kinds of men no one else will talk to. Also LOL at him for attacking his audience for saying "Don't have that guy on"
 
Forget the veracity of the rape story. Is it not really fucking weird to have this guy on now of all times? Like maybe taking a break from the grimy sex stuff is a good idea and a few happy go lucky shows in between twerking 11 year olds and teenage girls getting raped is in order?

This is going to be what actually loses dax viewers is his need to build this narrative to support his pet interests.

Also lol
 
I believe he probably used the legal loopholes of how it was fucking up and also threw in those claims as well otherwise why is Joosh able to make money without any issues and Dax still on a Match list (allegedly)? I think money laundering is a legit possibility given his engagement going down but the money going up

I remember a stream where Josh said he can't have a PayPal, finds it hard to get credit cards from US banks, and mostly uses crypto.

I bet he could get a debit card in Eastern Europe though.
 
2:23:28 Dick: "You wanna talk about Cuties now?"
I don't listen to shit that makes me angry. But feel free to listen from that timestamp and let us know what went down.
I guess I'll do it

TL DR is Dick continued his defence of the film his main talking points are well if you don't like this why don't you also dislike Nickelodeon Disney and other weird media Outlets that have put out pedophilic like content. Baked's reply to this it's just I hate that as well which kind of makes dicks argument Fall Apart. There's also a big Schism about posting the clips of cuties which I just find retarded. Dick sticks to his talking points like "The pedophile thing just seems like the right wing version of screaming racist" Trying to muddle the line and being a Libertarian (what are you going to do make it illegal). I thought Baked came off really well I say this is someone who doesn't like baked. Overall just looks like dick got bullied on his own show.

  • It starts off with baked essentially saying that he only knows about shit from Twitter and from The Andy warski debate
  • Baked make some basic points saying that he thinks it's wrong for Netflix to platform it saying that he has seen clips from Twitter
  • " We are all against pedophilia" - Dick
  • Now they're talking about the morality of sharing clips (if you think it's bad how could you share it versus I want people to know how bad it is)
  • he's essentially making the argument but what if I made a movie and said it was bad but I still showed the imagery...that's what this film is
  • "you're still making 12 year olds do that in real life is that appropriate." - Baked
  • But Muh dance pageant
  • "The parents don't have a problem with it" Dick
  • "do people think pedophiles are gonna watch a 3 hour french art house film" Dick
  • So far there appears to be a repetitive pattern where dick will bring up something like Tik Tok the Disney Channel or anything else with pedophilic themes hoping that baked will have to back down. Essentially saying well if you hate this why don't you also hate this but bake just says I hate that too so dicks argument kind of falls apart.
  • "these are 12 year olds they should not be sexualized" baked
  • what are ya gonna do make it illegal, yes.
  • "do you think its ok for a 12 year old to be sexualized in a film" baked "ummmmm" Dick
  • " What is the point in the government if not to protect something like this from happening" other guest idk who
  • "This encourages pedophilia and that is a terrible" other guest "you can't prove that" Dick
  • "if I was those four girls I'd be more traumatized by a bunch of right-wingers telling me what a slut I was in this picture then I ever would be doing some dumb dance routine" Dick
  • *talking over each other*
  • Dick says he wouldn't let his Hypothetical child be in the film
  • "So you just let your kids get molested" other guest
  • Do you want the government to step in - Dick
    for sexualizing minors yes - baked
  • "I think they are bad parents" - baked
  • " The pedophile thing just seems like the right wing version of screaming racist" Dick ( this is my talking point and I'm sticking to it)
  • " you don't think the country is controlled by pedophiles" "no" ( Correct me if I'm wrong here but wasn't this one of his main points while talking to Josh that lolicon didn't really matter because Hollywood was controlled by pedophiles)
  • Baked is sucking off Trump for a resting 600 child sex traffickers in LA
  • Baked wants Dick to go to a save the children rally he sighs
  • "It starts with talking about it and promoting healthy families that aren't sexualizing their kids" Baked "sounds like that's what the director did" Dick
  • They are pushing for a reply on why he isn't morally outraged about it
  • "he's just an extreme libertarian"
  • "Why is it hard to say that's wrong" Baked "because parents are allowed to parent their kids" Dick
  • Baked is pushing him on why he wouldn't let his daughter be in the film
  • Sean is playing to both sides
  • Talking about Tulsi gabbard showing the clip same argument about tweeting out clips of the film
  • "I think it's funny" Dick
  • end

1601136007036.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back