the war today is biological. dregs/jews (dysgenic) vs elites/middle class (idealist society). If you follow the dregs course of actions there is only scenarios of which the end of the world plays out; hunger, disease, retardation, dropping birthrates, crime, politics, war. or, you accept the biological race war, and only the biologically guilty must die.
when you compromise with sharing you are choosing to accept eventual extinction. socialism (sharing) in any form inherently pushes back against natural selection, and promotes dependence. i'm not saying its never a good option, i'm just saying you should have a good reason. even limiting dangerous products; electronics, harmful information, sexual perversion, laced food products, immoral entertainment, etc.. pushes back against natural selection, and promotes dependence.
the war today is biological and not cultural, some may say white people are the bourgeoisie, mao believed homosexuals were the bourgeoisie, one thing that has remained true throughout leftist rhetoric is that, whoever is on the backs of the operational system is the bourgeoisie.
those who claim the definition of bourgeoisie never shifts are merely following a scripted communist retort for the 2000s era.
this idea of "the bourgeoisie" being an amorphous entity is evidence of biological contamination of national perseverance. genotypes, phenotypes, and resources are the primary factors in not only intelligence, but what archetypes evolutionary philosophy mutates into per generation. those evolutionary philosophies competitive in nature are what causes the weak to band together and attack the strong to survive. should individuals be capable of "free will" they would strive mainly for a sustainable future. the question is whether humans are inherently good, or, inherently evil. no matter if they are inherently good or evil, humans have a right to self preservation when faced with total annihilation.