Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)
- Thread starter Borscht
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
And here I thought today was going to suck.
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
SCOTUS appointments have amounted to nothing, and now they're saying Democrats can hound him until they're ripping his corpse apart. I get not being the meme projection the MAGA crowd came up with, but with this shit, what's the point of even trying to go against the establishment?
Les Morfalous
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
Meh.Call me when he decides to use the words "Negroe" and "indolent" in the same sentence.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2020
The Supreme Cuck does its thing yet again.....
I was expecting something like this result sooner or later, but I didn't think it'd be shot down so fucking fast. These fuckers are deeper into the swamp than most people realized.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
Hey remember when the ACB was confirmed and people REEEEEed for weeks that now big bad Trump and the Republicans would take over and destroy all their rights?
Has the Supreme Court yet ruled ONCE in Trump's favor? I'm not saying whether it should or should not, but it seems like the Supreme Court isn't in Trump's pocket as the MSM claimed it would be.
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
No, and nobody will really celebrate this because there are Trump appointed justices. That or slobber over Sotomayor and call on Thomas to retire or kick the bucket and talk about what’s going to happen and how great it’ll be after the packing.
WhimsicalTrolli
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
If only Trump didn't pick the McConnell influenced justices. Not yes men but not rinos who will turn their back on him.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2020
Only stuff to do with border wall funding I think.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2018
Completely abrogating their responsibility to hear cases out of partisan feelings or lack of judicial spine will in no way undermine their authority and ultimately the rule of law.
Right?
Right?
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
Proles aren’t allowed to dispute election law unless they come whining about race-based discrimination.
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
After 1/6, it seems the only options are Minecraft or REDACTED DUE TO POTENTIAL GLOWING AND GIVING NULL A HARD TIME
Anyone ever see the show Designated Survivor?
- Joined
- May 29, 2016
Biden is so smert and wunderful, the SCOTUS should really just refer their cases to all just go ask Joe what he thinks about the situation and let his opinion be the law of the land that loves him so much.
Dark Edea
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2020
Or if they show up to Capitol Hill with a guillotine.
That seemed to scare them so bad they're still having nightmares. hahahahahahah
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
Dark Edea
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2020
For the sake of clarity in the future, perhaps the Supreme Court should let us know precisely when election-related cases will be eligible to be scrutinized.
Regardless of your feelings on this specific case, this game of cat and mouse between mootness and standing is absurd legal bullshit. Are these cases only eligible in the twelve to twenty hour span during which votes are being cast and counted?
Academics please respond.
Regardless of your feelings on this specific case, this game of cat and mouse between mootness and standing is absurd legal bullshit. Are these cases only eligible in the twelve to twenty hour span during which votes are being cast and counted?
Academics please respond.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
When a Democrat is bringing the case with media backing, of course. The "justices" might not be invited to some cocktail party otherwise.
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2020
You have to adhere to the rules when it comes to verifying signatures for whether a third party candidate is eligible to be put on the ballot, but during the election, anything goes.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2019
I fixed that for you, no need to thank me good sir.
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
I told y'all, Trump would've been better served appointing the uber-conservicuck Rushing over the RINO Barrett. I said she was going to be a weak virtue signaling "I am so not racist that I even adopt black kids for brownie points" lame duck. But noooo, Trump knows what he's doing.
Retard. At least Roberts has shown his allegiance with Dubya; what the fuck good did his 3 justices do him? I hope to God he doesn't get a second term so he can waste it on pardoning even more of Snoop Dogg's friends.
- Status