Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

[sperginity]

"Yeah just get them reduced"
It's not like your shoulder joints are important or anything, but we are talking about a faction of humanity that believes filleting genitals can turn them into totally functional genitals of the opposite sex.
If you're this retarded, you need a wrangler.

even if it were possible to simply "reduce the shoulders", males still have much longer arm bones than females. Imagine how much longer the arms would look if you pinched the shoulders in without addressing large manly arms and hands. The hands would rest closer to the legs and draw attention to how far down the thigh bone the hands rest, a clear result of male puberty lengthening the long bones of the skeleton- this kind of observation is done by parts of the brain that are very old, the parts that make a judgment call about the sex of other humans. Its noticed within an instant, and is present in young children because the existence of sexually dymorphic males and females is millions of years old in our evolutionary history. every step taken to correct troons surgically just makes them look weirder because the raw materials are so obviously male or female.

 

[Smug Cat]

This thread is long so apologies if I've missed this being posted already or am repeating information.

Pretty sure this picture has already been posted to this thread. Dude gets his nuts cut off and then immediately loses the desire to transition because it killed his sex drive and it was all a fetish.

I ran across this again on another site and got curious as to whether this guy detransitioned and is taking testosterone or if he kept on with the transition. So I found the original Reddit post (Removeddit | Archive).
Already in this thread he's saying that all his problems were from not taking estrogen post-ball-chop and anyone saying otherwise is a dirty transphobe.

His user profile (A) is still up, with the most recent posts as of yesterday talking about his plans to get FFS. He's going to a Dr Cardenas for a "severe type 3" on his forehead, which means he has an enormous neanderthal brow.

I unfortunately didn't find any selfies on his profile page, probably because even he realizes he looks like a pig in lipstick.

It appears that he's broken up with the aforementioned gf and he was an absolute fucking asshole about it (Archive) Fortunately for the gf it sounds like she's now in a happy relationship with a normal dude.

I'll let anyone interested sort through his profile for anything else hilarious, but in the meantime enjoy this variety of insane posts about conservatives and Trump.

Spoiler: Tranny Sperging

 

[Kiislova]

*snip*

why would you support a man who needs handlers to not look completly idiotic?

 

[Flavius Claudius Julianus]

Jesus fucking Christ, I’ve just found one of the most infected, disgusting stink ditches I have ever seen. Apparently it’s wound dehiscence. Interesting that they’d actually call it that considering it’s transphobic to call their neovags open wounds.

For those who aren’t brave enough to see this gross shit. It’s basically an amhole that is full of yellow and green puss while also leaking blood . The hole kinda reminds me of the Half-Life logo.

Spoiler: This is bad

Spoiler: Like, seriously bad

Spoiler: I fucking warned you.

View attachment 1935372
View attachment 1935373
View attachment 1935375
View attachment 1935376
View attachment 1935374
View attachment 1935406
View attachment 1935378
View attachment 1935379
View attachment 1935388
View attachment 1935389
View attachment 1935380

Disgusting and depraved enough to want to see more photos? You sick cunt, enjoy it: https://photos.google.com/share/AF1...?key=Wlk2N1dUdl85MWFxMUNCQ0tmNnFCMkdZc0N0YUpB

That is the worst thing I've ever seen in my life.

Thanks for that.

 

[AnOminous]

Pretty sure this picture has already been posted to this thread. Dude gets his nuts cut off and then immediately loses the desire to transition because it killed his sex drive and it was all a fetish.

Lmao idiot chops off the organs literally responsible for producing the hormones that cause sex drive and then *surprised pikachu face* he suddenly has no sex drive. Cool fetish bro.

 

[Banditotron]

Lmao idiot chops off the organs literally responsible for producing the hormones that cause sex drive and then *surprised pikachu face* he suddenly has no sex drive. Cool fetish bro.

Self-solving fetish. Fascinating.

 

[Bibendum]

I have a question. I've noticed that often neovaginas are placed way below where they should be, sometimes entirely outside the labia (see examples below -- these aren't even the worst cases of this phenomenon). Essentially these surgical results look like the following ascii diagram:
(')
°
Surgeons know that the vaginal opening is located between the labia in real women, so why is this ridiculous placement such a common result in SRS? I've seen so many examples of this odd feature -- it's a dead-giveaway -- and yet these results are still widely praised on trans subreddits and I haven't seen many acknowledgements of this obvious flaw. Is wonky neovaginal placement associated with one particular technique? How is it that this issue is never mentioned? Surgeons obviously know this is a bizarrely erroneous result, yet it seems inherent to the procedure, or at least some variant of it -- how does this continue to be so widely practiced, especially if there are alternative techniques with more realistic placement?

Spoiler: NSFW

View attachment 1943122-3bc22055371b626efa0a9e2df9047025.webp

 

[gaystoner]

View attachment 1996819
View attachment 1996917View attachment 1996920

Spoiler: my reaction

more from the insane troon

 

[UncleTusky]

Surgeons know that the vaginal opening is located between the labia in real women, so why is this ridiculous placement such a common result in SRS? I've seen so many examples of this odd feature -- it's a dead-giveaway -- and yet these results are still widely praised on trans subreddits and I haven't seen many acknowledgements of this obvious flaw. Is wonky neovaginal placement associated with one particular technique? How is it that this issue is never mentioned? Surgeons obviously know this is a bizarrely erroneous result, yet it seems inherent to the procedure, or at least some variant of it -- how does this continue to be so widely practiced?

My understanding is that what you're describing is not possible with the current techniques - the location of the urethra and "vagina" are more or less fixed because they're dictated by the anatomy of the penis and the surgeon can do more, but still just a finite amount, with the scrotal tissue used to make the "labia". It might be possible to have the labia around the "vagina" instead of the urethra but there is not a way to have the labia around the "clit" and vagina concurrently. The "clit" is the remnants of the glans so there might be issues with overstimulating it if it weren't covered.

This is all based on the most common technique called penile inversion which is exactly what it sounds like. There are newer, less used techniques based on grafting intestinal or colon tissue into the location and that might alleviate the issue.... huge emphasis on the word "might". I just don't know enough about anatomy to say whether the surgeon could move the opening higher up using these techniques without interfering with the "labia" or running into issues with other internal structures like the pubic bone or prostate.

We're also talking about surgeons who treat these procedures like trade secrets. Even if there is some overlooked technique that solves these issues the person who discovers it is much more likely to announce it via a press release than a journal article.

 

[High-Functioning Autism]

Kathy Rumer the butcher is at it again:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Transgender_Surgeries/comments/m4vp2s/2_months_post_op_progress_pictures_dr_kathy_rumer/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

Spoiler: I don’t need to warn you, you should know by now

Posts from the same user:



Remember guys, this is life saving surgery.

 

[High-Functioning Autism]

Wouldn‘t consider this horrific or gruesome but ffs, those nipples are terrible. I can see why the nipple graft was done for free because if I paid for that shit, I’d be fucking pissed.

Sign in | Transbucket.com

Spoiler: NSFW

 

[High-Functioning Autism]

“Exposing Dr. Jess Ting”

https://www.reddit.com/r/Transgender_Surgeries/comments/ivg63v/exposing_dr_jess_ting_in_nyc/

https://www.realself.com/review/mtf-vaginoplasty-ting-mount-sinai-botched-srs

When I had the packing and catheter taken out his first words were “where’s the clitoris?” Really!! Like I was the one who did the surgery!! I can also literally stick my finger in my own urethra!

Hahaha, the ‘surgeon’ doesn’t even know what the fuck he did during the surgery.

Spoiler: NSFW

Spoiler: NSFW - Saggy Sack

Looks like a very sad and old deflated ballsack. Which is exactly what it is.

Well, at least his fucked up results stopped some other poor tranny getting mutilated by the infamous ’Dr’. Ting.

I do wonder though, wtf do these men expect to get from having their dick filleted and shoved inside an open wound to create a “vaginal opening” and having their balls cut up and stitched into a pair of wrinkly, saggy lips? Do these men genuinely think they’re going to get some amazing ‘designer vagina’ that looks exactly like the real thing?

Maybe I’m too desensitised but his isn’t even that bad. He should be fucking grateful it hasn’t started rotting or falling apart like one of my most favourite degenerates:

Spoiler: NSFL - The worst one I’ve seen... so far

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

Do these men genuinely think they’re going to get some amazing ‘designer vagina’ that looks exactly like the real thing?

YES, they do.

 

[Punitive Castration]

Wouldn‘t consider this horrific or gruesome but ffs, those nipples are terrible. I can see why the nipple graft was done for free because if I paid for that shit, I’d be fucking pissed.
View attachment 1997603

Sign in | Transbucket.com

Spoiler: NSFW

View attachment 1997599View attachment 1997600
View attachment 1997601View attachment 1997602

why are her nipples asian

 

[PresidentTerf]

I never cross my legs so hard as when I read (and I've read it a few times now) "I can stick my fingers up my own urethra"

Well no that's a lie, I crossed my legs harder reading about the ftms getting HAIR there.

 

[Banditotron]

At this point just go at these guys' taints with a post hole digger while they do a handstand. You'd get better results for cheaper.

 

[keyboredsm4shthe2nd]

I have a question. I've noticed that often neovaginas are placed way below where they should be, sometimes entirely outside the labia (see examples below -- these aren't even the worst cases of this phenomenon). Essentially these surgical results look like the following ascii diagram:
(')
°
Surgeons know that the vaginal opening is located between the labia in real women, so why is this ridiculous placement such a common result in SRS? I've seen so many examples of this odd feature -- it's a dead-giveaway -- and yet these results are still widely praised on trans subreddits and I haven't seen many acknowledgements of this obvious flaw. Is wonky neovaginal placement associated with one particular technique? How is it that this issue is never mentioned? Surgeons obviously know this is a bizarrely erroneous result, yet it seems inherent to the procedure, or at least some variant of it -- how does this continue to be so widely practiced, especially if there are alternative techniques with more realistic placement?

Spoiler: NSFW

View attachment 1997398
View attachment 1997393

It really says something when the best result you can post is a goddamn disaster. Like is that space under the labia meant to be the fuckhole, or? Because even with ones like this where the hole is "properly" placed, they all seem to split like that with a random hole in the victim's taint. (Jesus, medkiwis pls explain, even if you can't, try your best I'm begging you)

Anyways, for the ones where the hole is place purposefully on the victim's taint, I'd guess it has something to do with male pelvic structure and the existence of the testes. Women have or are supposed to have a uterus at the end of their "pelvic opening", and for men you'd probably end up having intestine in the way if you put the hole in the "correct" place would be my guess.

But the simplest answer is that this is butchery with no standard so some of them hack away and call it good at the worst and with the results having no standard outcome, is just something that happens at best. Kind of like how most lobotomy victims were left vegetables, but there were a select few that "benefitted" from the procedure.

 

[mister butafuco]

It really says something when the best result you can post is a goddamn disaster. Like is that space under the labia meant to be the fuckhole, or? Because even with ones like this where the hole is "properly" placed, they all seem to split like that with a random hole in the victim's taint. (Jesus, medkiwis pls explain, even if you can't, try your best I'm begging you)

I think that the reason that the neovagina ends up below the labia is that the placement of the neovagina has to be nearer the anus than in a woman in order to avoid the prostate.

Then when the surgeon construct the labia they are going for aesthetics, so they try to create labia with a length approximating those seen on females, even though if it means they stop before the neovagina. At first glance this set up probably looks better than if surgeon had the labia envelop the neovaginal entrance. I reckon if they tried that it would look like the trans woman was smuggling a Whopper bun between their legs.

 

[repentance]

I think that the reason that the neovagina ends up below the labia is that the placement of the neovagina has to be nearer the anus than in a woman in order to avoid the prostate.

In real women the vagina and the rectum are still pretty close together but they're separated by a wall of some of the most powerful muscles in the human body.

Women don't have free-floating vaginas, which is what SRS seeks to create. All of the muscles and ligaments holding everything in place can weaken in natal women, but they don't exist at all in fauxginas.

 

[DopeaddictKitten]

Holy fuck we need a 'FUCKIN LOL' react.

I honestly can't decide what's funnier, the pathetic, wrinkly, deflated ballsac 'labias' or the very simple ass crack extension 'vagina' with no real vaginal like attributes besides well, the crack??


Thanks to you all contributing to the thread, you've kept me entertained the last few days as well as pumping up my terf stats. Can't wait to keep laughing at AGPs.. okay the hairy meat tubes are pretty hilarious too