- Joined
- May 8, 2021
It's not made less boring by your comment. You could have just shut up and let moderation take care of it, that annoying user was backseat moderating and i expected a legit mod to remove all posts related to it. But no, you had to chime in with your useless comment like a petty loser. It wasn't about you and your opinion doesn't matter.Most boring slap fight on the internet
Anything bad happening to a legit female has to be relativized next to what happens to troons. It's one of the thing that's peaked me.scoob87 said:
View attachment 2293744
View attachment 2293745
View attachment 2293746
View attachment 2293747
Link | Archive
Troons vs making everything about themselves pt. 4141
Yes because harvesting organs and shoving them into an incompatible body in a deranged attempt to live out your pregnancy/period fetish is super comparable to a woman having a contraceptive device inside her body against her will wanting it removed.
There was never a version of them that had an uterus. From before conception it wasn't gonna happen. They can sire children like a man does, anyway, so it's not like they are deprived from the option.
So the fact that they treat it like it's unfair and society has to correct it is vertigo-inducing. They like to treat their healthy male biology like it's a disease or a Curse from the Fate, and then screech about how considering females like the gold standard for femaleness is a hate crime. I am tired. It makes no sense.
How do you feel about troons, kiwis?
I feel like i used to be sympthetic and trying to understand the deal and now i am a little bit less sympathetic and a lot more tired. I suppose JKR, Chimamanda and a lot a users feel the same. And i used to trust that they were acting in good faith and it's no longer the case.
The ontological debates are pointless btw. You will define things one way, they will define it another. It's more usefull to say that they are people who prefere to live as a different gender and you can respect that preference. That they can be women in some contexts but obviously can't represent the majority of women in some others.
BTW young people aren't gonna be "more conservative as a result of their pozzed parents", not in any positive way if society doesn't change for the better.
They are just gonna be more intolerant but also more bent of protecting "individual identities" and irrational beliefs because apparently that's more important that truth. A more fractured, tribal society, each group in his own regressive bubble, that's the plan. And tensions are just gonna escalade because everybody is gonna be overprotective of one's identity, instead of the common good. The Republicans and right-wingers don't have a better track record when it comes to armfull, irrational beliefs, they cater to religious nuts all the time.
Prolego said:
There was a table posted a couple of years ago (I think) on Twitter that had clearly come from a leak from the IOC or IAAF, or the like. It listed all the women medallist by event, alongside what the testosterone concentration in their body had been recorded at the end of event drugs test. It was also helpfully annotated. Most women medallists fell into the normal range. Some had testosterone levels of 5-8 nmols/L, marked up as dopers (but no-one had figured out quite how) and others were in the 20-30nmols/L level, and pointedly marked as men. Did anyone keep a copy of that. I assumed it would be easy to find again, but obviously I was wrong.
I would almost pay money to see such tables. Of course if anybody is capable to track this video down it should archived immediatly.
Last edited: