Secret Gamer Girl / SecretGamerGrrl / Googleshng / "Violet Hargrave" / Jacob Lawrence (Jake) Alley / Violet Cassandra Ocean - Delusional Zoe Quinn Stalker, Libelous Tweeter, Thirsty Gnome, Faux-Tranny Neckbeard Incel, Micropenis, "Known Troubled Person", Creator of "Massive vs the Masses", Self-Described "Noise Making Thing"; Lives in Niantic, CT

I like the way Jake has to specify this particular photo when talking about the incident, because he knows he’s full of shit. Let’s look at some other photos from the event. Tara Wolf, the mere slip of a girl helpless against the brutal assault by a woman nearing retirement age, is the one in the camouflage hoodie.
View attachment 2323922View attachment 2323923View attachment 2323924

As you can see, she was minding her own business, just casually walking through Hyde Park for no reason, when a TERF flew into a violent murderous rage and started spontaneously beating the shit out of Tara. Case closed.
Only an incel and misogynist would justify a man beating an elderly lady.

Jake, incidentally, is both. Funny how that works.
 
Hey, Jake, why don't you just post the minute-long highlight video showing that massive beast of a woman taking on the midget troons and flattening them one by one?

 
Since Granny wrote that blistering post about him, he's been stewing in his hatred of her. Time to refresh our memories:

I suspect that all the approval he gets from putting the boot into me from safely behind the block gives him a warm gooey feeling. It’s probably the closest he ever gets to getting laid, which is why he’s still doing it more than 10 months after the event.

Source: https://www.peaktrans.org/a-week-in-the-life-of/#ftoc-heading-1

Four years later he's as orgasmic as ever.
 
Violet suggests you do a search for "nude trans women" to learn some facts bigots:
1625691605494.png
 
If you Google “nude trans women” you get a bunch of dick girls and shemale porn.
So I’m really lost at what point he was trying to make? That traps aren’t gay?
He claims to not know what female and male genitalia looks like so he might be pleading ignorance as usual. I'm not going to google "nude trans women on twitter" but I suspect the image search result will be very similar to googling "dick pics".
 
"See these traps? This is what I look like! Honest!"
I'm going to put this in terms that Jake can understand:

There's a monster in dungeons & dragons called a mimic. A mimic seems to have the appearance of a treasure chest, but when the party gets near, the "treasure chest" opens, to reveal that it's actually a tooth-lined mouth, with a long tongue, which gobbles up the closest party member.

It's not a trap, if the mouth lined with sharp teeth looks like... a mouth lined with sharp teeth.
 
He claims to not know what female and male genitalia looks like so he might be pleading ignorance as usual. I'm not going to google "nude trans women on twitter" but I suspect the image search result will be very similar to googling "dick pics".
No need to go offsite, we have plenty already under the islamic spoiler.

Also worth noting: this took place on September 13th 2017. Nearly four years ago. Jake still cannot shut up about this.
He's still crying about GG 7 years later, his entire life is anchors to events in the distant past.
 
Let's Learn Gnomish: Grammar / Sentence Structure

@Kosher Dill called in sick, so I'm taking over for today.

The most prominent feature of the Gnomish language is its extremely complex and ambiguous sentence structure, characterized by heavy use of adverbs, embedded clauses, and run-on sentences that stretch over dozens of tweets at a time like Virgil's immaculate hexameter.

Gnomish has an elaborate system of humble and honorific speech, comparable to that of Japanese or Korean, but serving a completely different purpose. The aforementioned Far Eastern languages use honorific speech to emphasize the speaker's manners and social intelligence. Gnomish's system of honorifics serves the exact opposite purpose: its purpose is to obfuscate the identities of the parties involved, and to create plausible deniability in the event that they have no idea what the fuck they're talking about (which they never do) or come off as a creep (which they always do).

Take this excerpt from one of Jake's lesser-known works, "The Workification of Games". Words that distract from, mollify, or obfuscate the writer's point are highlighted in bold:
RPGs then became kind of a thing. They got longer and more involved. There was a stretch where basically, every 5 years, the amount of time you had to sink into a single RPG to see the ending doubled, until they turned into these 80+ hour Commitments. It isn’t “today I think I’m going to sit down and play Xenogears before dinner.” It’s “this month I’m going to spend like 4 hours between getting home and making dinner playing Xenogears, should be finished by the 30th or so.” And hey, whoops! That’s a job now! In my own personal experience, that was literally a job. I spent some time reviewing games professionally. I was being paid by the article, and seeing the game through before reviewing it was a policy at that outlet, so, yeah. I had to sit down with these big 80 hour epics and slog through them, getting in as many hours as I could each day, just like some people had to gostand behind a counter flipping hamburgers or sit at a desk making phone calls. A full on job.

Now granted, at the time, it was mainly just RPGs that did that, and most people didn’t literally play them for a living. So OK you have your one big PROJECT of a game to slowly chip through and then everything else you’re playing is relatively light. Only relatively though, because hey, RPGs were the first genre to really get LONG, and took it to the greatest extremes, but damn near ALL games in the mid-90s could be counted on to have some main story-progression mode too long to be played in a single sitting, with save files to maintain your progress. And that PROGRESSION creep never went away. Super Mario Odyssey has somewhere around 1000 moons for you to go find before you can say you’re done. That’s a pretty sizeable commitment to plug away at.
These characteristic features are strongly amplified when the speaker is trying to make a point or persuade someone.

The Gnomish people take great pride in their linguistic and rhetorical skills. Gnomish secondary school students are trained in the Moldbug School of Argumentation, which involves making a point so nuanced, overqualified, and long-winded that anyone trying to refute it would have to use the majority of their working memory and brainpower just to comprehend what the other person is saying, leaving none to actually refute the point.

For illustrative purposes, I have manually diagrammed Jake's 203-word opus:

jake_alley_sentence_structure.png
View attachment jake_alley_sentence_structure_aligned.png

Adept students of linguistics will notice more than a few mistakes and elisions, in addition to a handful of nodes where I wrote "SHIT" or "FUCK" in lieu of a fitting label. This is because my brain glucose levels have been depleted by Jake's brilliant rhetoric, to the point where I am no longer capable of walking or talking autonomously. I wrote this post by dictating it to a team of handlers through an elaborate code of finger and eye movements.
 
For illustrative purposes, I have manually diagrammed Jake's 203-word opus:
Someone actually did it :lol: God bless, you absolute madman.

The point about space-filling words is interesting. Everyone knows he has a habit of talking around specific things ("that card-carrier who wrote books about wizards" and so forth), and rambling at length, but it's remarkable how much of his verbiage carries no meaning whatsoever. It's like the dark matter of the gnomiverse.
 
Someone actually did it :lol: God bless, you absolute madman.
It took me about an hour in paredit; and even then, there were a few clauses that I failed to properly classify, label, or fill out. Like this abomination:
fuck_my_life.png


Here's the raw tree structure, if you're interested:
[XP [CP But,[CP[C if][TP[NP things][AdvP actually][T DID][VP [V work] [NP [D that] [N way]]]]]][C ,][TP[NP [D all the] [AdjP [Adj foaming] [PP [P at] [NP [D the] [N mouth]]]] [N bigots][VP [V talking up] [NP [D their] [AdjP crazy] [N fantasies]][PP[P about][NP [NP [D these] [AdjP Incredible-Hulk-like] [AdjP trans] [N women]] [AdjP [XP [VP [A dominating] [NP [D all the] [N sports]]] [C because] [XP [TP [NP [D they]] [VP [V 're] [AdjP full [PP [P of] [NP testosterone]]]]] [C and] [TP [NP [D that]] [VP [V means] [TP [NP [D they] [VP [V have] [NP [AdjP eighteenhundred] [N strength]]]]]]]]]]]]]][T would][VP [V be][XP[AdjP [AdvP even more] [Adj wrong]][C than][VP [NP [D they]] [AdvP actually] [V are]]]]][C ,][CP[C because][TP[XP[NP [D the] [Adj only] [N reason]][C (that)][TP[NP I][VP [V know] [XP[PP [AdjP [AdvP so much] more] [P about] [NP [D this]]] [C than][NP [D the] [AdjP vast] [N majority] [PP [P of] [NP [D the] [N population]]]]]]][VP [V is] [CP [C that][XP[XP[TP [NP I] [VP [V 'm] [NP [D a] [Adj trans] [N woman]]]],[C which][VP[AdvP frankly][VP [V means][TP[NP I][AdjP really][VP[V want][NP [D all my] [AdjP BOY] [N CHEMICALS]][AdjP [X[AdjP [PP [Adj drained] [P out]] [C and][AdjP replaced [PP [P with] [NP [AdjP GIRL] [N CHEMICALS]]]]]]]]]]]],[C and][XP[TP [NP I] [XP [VP [V go] [V see] [NP [D a] [AdjP [AdvP really] [Adj good]] [N endocrinologist]]][C (implicit)]([NP [NP [D the] [AdjP medical] [N specialists]] [SHIT whose whole field is just] [NP [N studying up][PP [P on] [XP [NP [D all these] [AdjP many many] [N hormones]] [C and] [FUCK how they interact]]]]])]]][C and][TP [NP he] [V is][XP[X [AdvP both] [NP kind of a kill joy] [C and also] [AdjP [AdvP quite] chatty]][C ,][AdjP[AdvP always][XP[VP [V walking] [NP me] [PP [P through] [AdvP exactly] [CP [C what] [TP [NP [D the] [AdjP various] [N prescriptions] [TP [N he] [VP [V 's] [V putting] [PP [NP me] [P on]]]]] [AdjP actually] [V do]]]]],[C and][VP [V going] [PP [P over] [X [NP charts] [C and] [NP levels] [C and] [NP points [PP [P of] [N comparison]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]][C ,][TP[NP I][VP[V happen][V to know][CP[C that]in order to do[NP all the course correcting needed after years of things getting cranked out in the wrong ratios],[XP[TP [NP [D my] [AdjP androgen] [N levels]] [VP [V are] [AdvP all] [X [AdjP WAY lower] [C than] [NP [D the] [AdjP [NP [AdjP average] [N woman]] [Adj 's]]]]]],[C and][TP [NP [D my] [AdjP estrogen] [N levels]] [VP [V are] [AdvP all] [AdjP WAY higher]]]]]]].]
 
It's not that much harder to read than the original, really.
The entire field of syntax is predicated on the idea that the human brain can implicitly form tree structures from a linear sequence of words... seeing it all written out explicitly really helps you appreciate the power of the non-conscious mind.
 
Back