Skitzocow Vintologi / Carl Sebastian Andersson / vintologi_se / adolf512 / datorissten - Schizo tranny incel, "transmaxxing" cult leader, agp extraordinaire, reiko 2.0

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
This still doesn't mean you should fuck and impregnate 15 year olds,
Why not?

15 is the AoC in Sweden so there is no reason not to given the opportunity.

They are also near peak fertility at 15

1623322681400.png



We also see that even if the AoC was lower 13 year old would still not be ideal for reproduction (similar to how 30 year old females are not really ideal either).

Vinto. Neither does the outdated book based on research done 40 years ago you quoted earlier.
How is it outdated?
Look, just convert to Islam and buy a child bride from Afghanistan or Yemen. Alternatively move to the Philippines or Bangladesh, plenty of child prostitutes there.
Not interested.
 
Why not?

15 is the AoC in Sweden so there is no reason not to given the opportunity.

They are also near peak fertility at 15
I don't think the usual "massive difference in maturity" argument would work with you, so please consider, among other physiological effects of early pregnancy, vaginal prolapse and obstetrical fistula.
How is it outdated?
I don't know if you've noticed but a lot of things changed since the late 70s-early 80s.
 
I don't think the usual "massive difference in maturity" argument would work with you, so please consider, among other physiological effects of early pregnancy, vaginal prolapse and obstetrical fistula.
When one set of pseudoscience has been debunked you will move on to the next.


Of course it's better if the male is more mentally capable than the female, better for society that is, bad for people like you who will be rejected.

You didn't provide any citations regarding "vaginal prolapse" or "obstetrical fistula".
I don't know if you've noticed but a lot of things changed since the late 70s-early 80s.
You think basic biology has suddenly changed?

After adjustment for confounding factors, RRs (95% confidence interval) of fetal death and anaemia were respectively 1.37 (1.09-1.70) and 1.27 (1.15-1.40) for a 16-year-old compared to a 20-year-old mother. Younger mothers had significantly decreased risks of obstetric complications (preeclampsia, caesarean section, operative vaginal delivery and post-partum haemorrhage). Higher prevalence of prematurity and low birth weight in infants born to teenagers were not attributable to young maternal age after adjustment for confounding factors.


 
"Age of consent" has been around 16 as far back as ancient Greece - a lot of seemingly pro-pedophile nitwits love to cherry pick things like that while ignoring the greater context simply because they want to.


Likewise, having "low-status men" (e.x. such as incels) castrated and forced to serve a King or Queen as a Eunuch slave is as old as ancient times as well:

“And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship,” - Acts 8:27

“Now when Ebedmelech the Ethiopian, one of the eunuchs which was in the king's house, heard that they had put Jeremiah in the dungeon; the king then sitting in the gate of Benjamin;” - Jeremiah 38:7


You think basic biology has suddenly changed?

Having incels castrated is totally in sync with history as well as basic biology. (e.x. removing the sex organs = little to no sex drive - not having to worry about their professed lusts for pedophilia, rape and murder). Also, simply forcing them into slavery would be totally in sync with their low biological status and help take care of a lot of menial labor that no one else wants to do.

(e.x. It's been documented in evolutionary psychology that "high status" males don't have a shortage of potential female suitors, while "low-status" males in any species may resort to rape).

Now I could also go on a treatise about how "basic biology" is more or less irrelevant to intellectual fields like psychology, law, ethics, philosophy and so on (e.x. many addictions or disorders, such as food addiction or tobacco addiction are the result of "basic biology" being out of sync and detrimental to personal psychology and quality of life), but I'm not sure it's worth wasting anymore words on this poster.
 
You didn't provide any citations regarding "vaginal prolapse" or "obstetrical fistula".
Fair enough.
You think basic biology has suddenly changed?
No, but just as basic physics, our understanding of the subject had progressed - and I'm not referring to trannies and NBs and whatever retardation.
Plus the studies cited deal with a lot of societal things. Quoting you
Of the three studies that have specifically addressed this issue, one (Koo and Bilsborrow, 1980) finds no effect of early childbearing while two studies find a weak positive effect of early childbearing on labor force participation (Hofferth et al., 1978; Card, 1979). In these studies early childbearers (female) appear to be somewhat more likely to be in the labor force 10 years after high school than later childbearers. This is probably due to several factors:

0. Since early childbearers start their families early, at 1 and 5 years after high school fewer early than later childbearers are working (Card, 1977). Ten years after high school, however, their children are older while later childbearers have just begun their families and have young children in the home. Thus the early childbearers were more likely to be working 10 years after high school in the Card study and at age 24 in the Hofferth et al. study.

1. Early childbearers may have a greater economic need to work. Never married mothers who had an early birth have a high likelihood of being employed (Haggstrom et al., 1981). In a related study Trussell and Abowd (1979) also found that among whites increasing age at first birth lowers the propensity to work by raising the wage required to attract them into the work-force.

There are sex differences in the association between early childbearing and employment. At 1 and 5 years out of high school more males in the adolescent childbearer group were working, compared to their classmates (Card, 1977). Thus for males, each parenthood leads to entrance into the labor force. However, by 11 years out, these differences had disappeared. By 11 years after high-school most non-parenting males had also completed their schooling and entered the work force so the difference disappears.

Females, in contrast, work less while they have young children in the home, but as their children mature, they return to work. Thus the timing of the birth affects when that hiatus will occur. By the mid twenties, the later childbearers are beginning their families and dropping out of the work-force while the early childbearers are reentering.
I don't really see any biology here.
 
Fair enough.
From that:

In a study conducted in Mexico by [37] , complications during pregnancy were estimated to be at 26 percent (%) in adult women and 10 percent (%) in adolescents (p = 0.04). However, the gestational age and birth-weight were similar in both groups. The study further revealed that birth by cesarean section was more frequent among the offspring of adult women (65% compared to 48%, p = 0.015) than in adolescents.
 
From that:

In a study conducted in Mexico by [37] , complications during pregnancy were estimated to be at 26 percent (%) in adult women and 10 percent (%) in adolescents (p = 0.04). However, the gestational age and birth-weight were similar in both groups. The study further revealed that birth by cesarean section was more frequent among the offspring of adult women (65% compared to 48%, p = 0.015) than in adolescents.
Can you honestly say Mexico is comparable to Sweden or the USA? Do you actually think the same results apply? Biology is the same everywhere, indeed, but harmful environmental or societal effects vary - things like pollution or the quality of healthcare.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: literategorilla
Can you honestly say Mexico is comparable to Sweden or the USA? Do you actually think the same results apply? Biology is the same everywhere, indeed, but harmful environmental or societal effects vary - things like pollution or the quality of healthcare.
You think Mexico has a better healthcare system than Sweden?

As we have seen in more than one study the reason early pregnancy sometimes appear to have bigger risks is due to confounding factors, these are the things we need to focus on fixing.


 
Haha Ive known that this guy is Sebastian from ängelholm since april. His info has been on flashback for 3 years or something. I had no idea he was considered a "lolcow", i only knew him as an eccentric guy who hangs round looksmaxing circles trying to recruit people to his dysphoric crusade.


If you need translations of anything, I'm up for it. most swedish info sites have been milked of info, but notably his MrKoll page says he doesn't have a criminal record, that he moved out in may, as well as providing his phone number not previously posted here:
072-202 72 57

 
Not interested.
Ah, so he needs a white woman bc muh genetics.

I think we're getting a bit in the weeds with all this talk of fertility and birth defects. If there is a difference favoring younger girls (imo 20-30 is probably the ideal range and early high school sure as fuck ain't it because most of them physically aren't finished growing), the difference between a 14 year old and an 18 year old is negligible. Vintologi's autistic obsession with pedomaxxing his wife's (or wives') fertility rates is disgusting and ridiculous. Hopefully he either dies a virgin or gets married only to realize he is infertile.
 
You think Mexico has a better healthcare system than Sweden?

As we have seen in more than one study the reason early pregnancy sometimes appear to have bigger risks is due to confounding factors, these are the things we need to focus on fixing.


You're probably one of the most un-charismatic people I've ever seen run a cult like what retards are you actually convincing out there?
 
You're probably one of the most un-charismatic people I've ever seen run a cult like what retards are you actually convincing out there?
Most of the people I have seen in the vintologi discord server don't seem to completely care about the larger picture. Also many have high "AQ" so don't get phased by a lot of Adolf's thinking. When I look at his arguments regarding fertility, I just think "Eh, even if this is true it is not the politically smartest hill to die on. Furthermore, having people breed at such a young age goes against eugenic principles. For one, since adolescents are physically and mentally underdeveloped, then choosing from such a sample gives inaccuracies as to their genetic potential. Secondly, if fertility is what we want, we could just artificially select for fertility at older ages just as we genetically modify foods to expire slower". In general I feel as though darwinian vintologi is outdated. We will have designer babies soon anyways. Honestly eugenics in general might not be as effective as people hype it up to be.

My name isn't very serious, though I do respect Adolf. He is one of the only people I have met on the interwebz with an autism level close to my own (so autistic you start writing entire philosophical, political, and religious systems on your spare time). He is also a very based individual (and that is with the original meaning of "based", as opposed to the term now just devolving into "I agree with this guy"). Like, people point out the pedo, trans, and eugenics stuff. No one mentions his entirely partial suggested method to deal with people who have committed severe crimes: 'if he's a chad, give him a slap on the wrist. If a lesser male, force him to participate in gladiator blood sports. At least he will have some fun before he goes'. Also the semi-schizo physics and metaphysics discussions are comfy too.

If you have a similar mixture of autism and schizophrenia, I would give the actual vintologi community (not transmaxxing which is just full of edgy trans 4channers and redditors) a try.
 
Most of the people I have seen in the vintologi discord server don't seem to completely care about the larger picture. Also many have high "AQ" so don't get phased by a lot of Adolf's thinking. When I look at his arguments regarding fertility, I just think "Eh, even if this is true it is not the politically smartest hill to die on. Furthermore, having people breed at such a young age goes against eugenic principles. For one, since adolescents are physically and mentally underdeveloped, then choosing from such a sample gives inaccuracies as to their genetic potential. Secondly, if fertility is what we want, we could just artificially select for fertility at older ages just as we genetically modify foods to expire slower". In general I feel as though darwinian vintologi is outdated. We will have designer babies soon anyways. Honestly eugenics in general might not be as effective as people hype it up to be.

My name isn't very serious, though I do respect Adolf. He is one of the only people I have met on the interwebz with an autism level close to my own (so autistic you start writing entire philosophical, political, and religious systems on your spare time). He is also a very based individual (and that is with the original meaning of "based", as opposed to the term now just devolving into "I agree with this guy"). Like, people point out the pedo, trans, and eugenics stuff. No one mentions his entirely partial suggested method to deal with people who have committed severe crimes: 'if he's a chad, give him a slap on the wrist. If a lesser male, force him to participate in gladiator blood sports. At least he will have some fun before he goes'. Also the semi-schizo physics and metaphysics discussions are comfy too.

If you have a similar mixture of autism and schizophrenia, I would give the actual vintologi community (not transmaxxing which is just full of edgy trans 4channers and redditors) a try.
So you're basically saying complete retards like yourself are the ones who fall for this shit? Ok thanks for an example buddy.
 
So you're basically saying complete retards like yourself are the ones who fall for this shit? Ok thanks for an example buddy.
I will spell it out to you in concise words since you seem to lack a caregiver to keep you off the internet: no one really does, except like... one person.

That's from my perspective at least. It's fun either way.

Edit: I can't type
 
I will spell it out to you in concise words since you seem to lack a caregiver to keep you off the internet: no one really does, except like... one person.

That's from my perspective at least. It's fun either way.

Edit: I can't type
Well your post was so autistic and long and with that name I just assumed you were drinking the kool-aid too.
 
Back