Check
@Angry Canadian's posts lol, half are grossly misogynistic and the other half are aping feminist talking points to dunk on troons. Galaxy brain shit.
Many of the GC-ish talking points made here I actually agree with. But the presentation is unpalatable and degenerates into autistic screeching on both sides. As far as bathrooms and what not go, the issue that I really have to take with
@CammieDoxGirl is about her discomfort using a male restroom. I believe her when she says she fears doing so, although I do not believe that being assaulted is anywhere near as likely as she portrays it. And, I'm sorry to say Laura, I think there is a certain narcissism at play here given the fact that using the female restroom has the potential to make several women just as uncomfortable by using it. It's a dilemma to be honest, but it is more complicated than "just wanting to pee."
When the bathroom debate began in earnest publicly, I didn't really care about the issue because I was pretty naive about troons. I have known a few old school HSTS in my life and they were pretty cool and I wouldn't really have issue with them using a bathroom or changing room for women. But then I peaked and learned about AGP and whatnot, men who really hardcore fetishize this stuff, and I began to harden on the bathroom question a bit.
But as far as the bathrooms go, it eventually boils down to one of the major questions when it comes to troon-related stuff. TRAs have demands from society that are quite different than the gay rights activists of decades past. Even when it came to marriage the gay rights people were mostly (mostly!) talking about stuff that did not effect other people who minded their business. But on nearly every issue TRAs are advocating for things that very much do effect other people (almost invariably women) in troubling ways.
It's certainly a debate worth having, but not with simian screeching and poo-flinging. That shit is just embarrassing.