It likely will not come as a surprise to anyone reading this thread to learn that the most prolific "sex change" surgeon of the 70s and 80s wound up convicted of murder after amputating the leg of a 79-year-old man.
A former doctor is being tried on murder charges in the death of an elderly man who paid $10,000 to get a healthy leg amputated to satisfy a sexual fetish.
woah- my point is is completely related to adults- adults can do what the fuck they want.
kids shouldn’t be having any surgery.
but even adults who can do what the fuck they want should steer away from bottom surgery.
who the fuck assumes someone would be talking about it being A-Ok kids getting that kind of surgery.
you do realise more boob jobs are reductions rather than enlargements?
loads of women get breast reductions cos of back pain and general life problems.
sounds kinda like you don’t have tits.
no one has mentioned little kids and obviously the push to allow any old elective surgery for them is fucking abhorrence.
Look, nobody is arguing against breast augmentation (well, maybe a handful of radfems, I dunno.)
Nobody is arguing about breast reduction. Your huge E cups are causing you permanent back problems? Go for it.
(Just be aware that any kind of elective surgery has inherent risks, especially augmentation.)
It’s your body, go for it.
But there’s a difference in that AND GODDAMN CUTTING ALL OF YOUR BREASTS OFF!
It’s not like just a slightly bigger breast reduction. It’s cutting out a complex organ. AND most likely losing your nipples.
It’s not a good idea for a 16 year old, nor a 22 year old nor a 28 year old.
And no, it’s usually not like “you can just get a breast augmentation later if you regret it.” From what skin? If they have done the job properly, you’d have to be damn lucky to get anything resembling breasts back.
Bottom surgery=BAD!
Top surgery=BAD!
Fuck... Any kind of elective surgery needs to be taken seriously.
It likely will not come as a surprise to anyone reading this thread to learn that the most prolific "sex change" surgeon of the 70s and 80s wound up convicted of murder after amputating the leg of a 79-year-old man.
A former doctor is being tried on murder charges in the death of an elderly man who paid $10,000 to get a healthy leg amputated to satisfy a sexual fetish.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! That Wikipedia article is a trip!
His lack of a formal surgical qualification made it necessary for him to carry out sex reassignment surgery in his office on an out-patient basis, rather than in a fully equipped surgical theatre.[7] He also carried out surgeries in his garage and in motel rooms.
He was also charged with allowing patients to work as unqualified, medical assistants (allegedly as barter for their own subsequent surgery)
BTW: How come it’s medical malpractice when a mentally ill person asks a doctor to cut off a limb, but Kaiser foots the bill when a mentally ill person wants a “penis”, a “vagina” or their breasts cut off?
Nipples are high risk of cancer, so they get yeeted along with the rest of the breast in mastectomy for cases of actual breast cancer. Reconstruction is covered by insurance in the US, and patients get a lot of mindfuck from doctors and "awareness" campaigns to get immediate reconstruction -- "save the ta-tas" -- "hey, free boob job" -- how about putting women's health first instead of male gaze?
The reconstruction process is grueling and fraught with complications, and even without infections, skin necrosis, dehiscience, etc., patients still end up with a permanently numb tit that may or may not look anything like the other one.
Tissue expansion involves stretching the skin with weekly injections of saline into a bag placed under the skin until there's enough room for an implant. Reconstruction with donor tissue from the back or abdomen involves multiple surgical sites for the price of one, plus lots of scars and a weird patchwork effect on the reconstructed boob with mismatched skin tones and the possibility of pubic hair if relocated from an abdominal flap, or the loss of a muscle if taken from the back.
If you want nipples, there are medical tattoo artists who can draw them on for you. They're just there for looks and provide no benefit for the owner as they obviously have no erectile tissue and no sensation, erotic or otherwise.
Skipping the reconstruction and staying flat at least lets cancer patients heal faster and get on with their lives without months of procedures and revisions. And people literally do not even notice, let alone misgender the flat and fabulous because of the lack of boobs.
Nipples are high risk of cancer, so they get yeeted along with the rest of the breast in mastectomy for cases of actual breast cancer. Reconstruction is covered by insurance in the US, and patients get a lot of mindfuck from doctors and "awareness" campaigns to get immediate reconstruction -- "save the ta-tas" -- "hey, free boob job" -- how about putting women's health first instead of male gaze?
The reconstruction process is grueling and fraught with complications, and even without infections, skin necrosis, dehiscience, etc., patients still end up with a permanently numb tit that may or may not look anything like the other one.
Tissue expansion involves stretching the skin with weekly injections of saline into a bag placed under the skin until there's enough room for an implant. Reconstruction with donor tissue from the back or abdomen involves multiple surgical sites for the price of one, plus lots of scars and a weird patchwork effect on the reconstructed boob with mismatched skin tones and the possibility of pubic hair if relocated from an abdominal flap, or the loss of a muscle if taken from the back.
If you want nipples, there are medical tattoo artists who can draw them on for you. They're just there for looks and provide no benefit for the owner as they obviously have no erectile tissue and no sensation, erotic or otherwise.
Skipping the reconstruction and staying flat at least lets cancer patients heal faster and get on with their lives without months of procedures and revisions. And people literally do not even notice, let alone misgender the flat and fabulous because of the lack of boobs.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! That Wikipedia article is a trip!
His lack of a formal surgical qualification made it necessary for him to carry out sex reassignment surgery in his office on an out-patient basis, rather than in a fully equipped surgical theatre.[7] He also carried out surgeries in his garage and in motel rooms.
He was also charged with allowing patients to work as unqualified, medical assistants (allegedly as barter for their own subsequent surgery)
BTW: How come it’s medical malpractice when a mentally ill person asks a doctor to cut off a limb, but Kaiser foots the bill when a mentally ill person wants a “penis”, a “vagina” or their breasts cut off?
For the same reason that it violates the Hippocratic Oath to treat Bodily Integrity Disorder by cutting off limbs...but totally "Right Side of History" to callously refuse care/treatment to anyone who says "I disagree" to the Chinese flu "vaccine" and bray like a jackass to social and print media about it.
If you stop thinking about breasts as "me" and instead think of them as "mine", that goes a long way towards reconciling the consequences of breast cancer surgery. At that point they become just another non essential body part that wants to kill you.
Literally nobody is pressured to think they need "tonsil reconstruction" or "appendix reconstruction" after surgery to fix a life or health threatening condition. Likewise "uterus reconstruction" after a hysterectomy. Hormone replacement even turned out to be a huge clusterfuck.
People live and thrive just fine without these organs because they are not hyper-sexualized by horny men who see no value in females that doesn't involve their dicks.
Hell, babies survive just fine without mommy's tits too. There are are all kinds of reasons not to breastfeed one's infants and there is no shame in that. Fed is best and we need to stop pressuring women to believe otherwise.
There are ways to fill out a bodice convincingly -- ask any drag queen (panty hose and birdseed for example). The nice part is that that you can be any size you want without having to commit.
But yeah, no shade on women who opt to reconstruct, but we need to be a lot more transparent about the risks and complication rate, and we need to be a lot more transparent about the results.
Cancer is bad enough. Reconstruction that leaves a woman worse off cosmetically than the most depraved AGP troon should be a crime.
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! That Wikipedia article is a trip!
His lack of a formal surgical qualification made it necessary for him to carry out sex reassignment surgery in his office on an out-patient basis, rather than in a fully equipped surgical theatre.[7] He also carried out surgeries in his garage and in motel rooms.
He was also charged with allowing patients to work as unqualified, medical assistants (allegedly as barter for their own subsequent surgery)
BTW: How come it’s medical malpractice when a mentally ill person asks a doctor to cut off a limb, but Kaiser foots the bill when a mentally ill person wants a “penis”, a “vagina” or their breasts cut off?
"Doctors" of his ilk were not uncommon in the 70s, 80s, 90s, even into the 2000s. We called them "cutters," years ago, before that became so totally synonymous with self-harm. They did castrations, tongue splitting, digit and limb removal, etc, etc, the things that no reputable surgeon would do, or would not do without extensive documentation proving that you qualified in the case of sex change. There are still some of them around, I'm sure. But, with Medicare required to cover essentially every imaginable variety of genital mutilation, most of them quit operating out of motels and hung out a shingle.
As for the difference between treating body integrity identity disorder and gender dysphoric disorder...
Well, in my opinion, the difference is that Abbott/AbbieVie has yet to trademark a treatment for BIID. It also helps that no one with BIID and a lot of government connections is sitting on a war chest of a billion dollars and a demand that society as a whole indulge them.
A friend who decided to undergo reconstruction following a bilateral radical mastectomy said that the tissue expanders were far more painful than the mastectomy.
This is in reply to a post from more than a year ago, so it's very possible other people have commented on this, and I apologize if this is merely the latest in a line of identical statements. Nonetheless, I feel compelled, as someone who watched this happen, to say:
Look, nobody is arguing against breast augmentation (well, maybe a handful of radfems, I dunno.)
Nobody is arguing about breast reduction. Your huge E cups are causing you permanent back problems? Go for it.
(Just be aware that any kind of elective surgery has inherent risks, especially augmentation.)
It’s your body, go for it.
But there’s a difference in that AND GODDAMN CUTTING ALL OF YOUR BREASTS OFF!
It’s not like just a slightly bigger breast reduction. It’s cutting out a complex organ. AND most likely losing your nipples.
It’s not a good idea for a 16 year old, nor a 22 year old nor a 28 year old.
And no, it’s usually not like “you can just get a breast augmentation later if you regret it.” From what skin? If they have done the job properly, you’d have to be damn lucky to get anything resembling breasts back.
Bottom surgery=BAD!
Top surgery=BAD!
Fuck... Any kind of elective surgery needs to be taken seriously.
Mastectomy is a painful but relatively safe surgery, like orchiectomy. Removing body parts that interfere with someone's functioning isn't bad at all.
The reason we remove secondary sex organs, but not arms and legs, is that you can in fact function normally in all but the reproductive sense without breasts or penis- but you can't without legs or arms.
If someone isn't planning to reproduce, there's no functional need for any of the reproductive system except the parts that produce necessary hormones (ovaries, testes). If someone is taking medications to replace those hormones and has these functional organs removed there can be serious side effects, but it's still safer than almost anything in this thread. There's centuries of research into these specific operations, decades of modern peer-reviewed data.
I can't find the post but there's a recent one about complications, a Dr. Mclusk?
this post:
HellzKelz is your typical Reddit troon (weeb, gamer, in his early 20s, etc).
Capture.PNG
1.jpg2.jpg
He went in about a month ago for SRS with Dr. Christopher McClung in Ohio...
Reddit thread: 2 week post-op vaginoplasty with Dr. McClung
Hi everyone! I finally got the bravery to post this with a picture because not a lot of information exists on this surgeon and I wanted to write about my experience.
Two weeks post-op picture
I arrived in Columbus after a lengthy drive two days in advance and arrived with my mother at our hotel. We figured we would spend the evening relaxing.
The day before surgery at about 7am was pre admission testing where they did a brief physical, took my blood, gathered an extensive medical history and sent me home with antibacterial soap. I had to start bowel prep immediately afterwards where I drank a bottle of magnesium citrate. Lemon flavored and it was horrendously bitter but downable. Not much can be said about the day except it was spent next to or on the toilet as I completely cleared out. That night and at 4am I needed to take showers using the antibacterial soap.
Day of surgery I was anxious. I arrived at about 5:30am and got checked in. Before my mother and I parted ways, they had to give me anti-anxiety medication because while I was confident, I was very anxious. I opted for an epidural (which turned out to be an incredibly good idea) and my memory stops being wheeled in.
I have a brief bit of memory in recovery where I was extremely sick. I'm sensitive to anesthesia so I ended up throwing up and somehow making an unexpected bowel movement. This complication soiled my dressing and I had to be wheeled back in and put under again to redress and repack my neovagina.
Memory resumes in the hospital room where the first two days were focused on a cycle of get painkiller, fall asleep, wake up hurting or getting checked on, sleep again.
Nothing super notable occurs for a while until day 5 of my stay. I had my packing removed and I could see my vagina for the first time. I couldn't stop crying, happy crying mind you. It was VERY swollen but it was mine, I didn't care, the pressure of the packing was really uncomfortable. Dr. McClung discussed my surgery and explained what happened to fill the memory gaps.he stated my result may take longer to heal due to the complication I had in recover but he says he believes the result should heal well and he stated it was one of the best he believes he has done to date.
Day 6 I was discharged but with a catheter still in me. Unfortunately, the urethra and the area needs longer to heal due to the complication and as a result the catheter would not be removed until the next Friday. Unfortunately my bowels restarted late as well, which meant only yesterday did my catheter come out.
During my two follow up on last Friday and yesterday, Dr McClung is pleased to see I'm able to fairly comfortably walk and stand. Admittedly it does still hurt, but I am healing well in that department. Since the catheter came out, I've had no troubles peeing on my own, thankfully. Dr. McClung says he has no concerns about my healing and says it looks quite good right now.
Dr. McClung states that my dilations will start on the 19th at my next appointment.This feels very late compared to other surgeries I have read, but this was likely because of what happened during surgery.
At the top of the post is my picture. The labia is still fairly swollen but I expected this due to to what happened. The redressing and repacking introduced increased swelling. The only things that make me nervous are how late my dilation start and the vaginal opening seems more wounded and clotted than I typically see in other posts. Maybe I am just overanxious (a trend for me) and it will all heal up just as well as Dr. McClung says it will. There just isn't much information out there to base things off of.
Anyways, I am open to any and all questions about my journey for things I missed or clarifications and hopefully this post will help people in the future. I'm spending my birthday today as the real me, and I cannot even begin to describe what kind of elation and happiness that brings me. Makes me almost cry from happiness.
EDIT: Forgot to mention this, but once I spend some time on dilation and heal more, I will be making a video that goes into a lot more detail about my experience, and talk about a lot of things to do to prepare and what to expect as a helpful and detailed vlog for people embarking on this incredibly amazing journey. You are all valid and awesome <3
I highlighted some of the funny bits. He shit himself after the surgery (keep this in mind for later...), and Dr. McClung thinks this stinkditch is some of his best work yet.
And it doesn't get said enough, but I find it irritating how these troons always seem to drag their mother, wife, or girlfriend along for support (and often to serve as their personal caretaker).
3.jpeg
Well done, Dr. McClung! Fine work indeed.
HelzKelz posted an update yesterday. He's now one month post-op.
"Things... got a bit rough on my end. No picture this time, I really can't find much encouragement to post one right now." Hmmm
Hopefully things have been treating you all well! Things... got a bit rough on my end. No picture this time, I really can't find much encouragement to post one right now.
So pretty much one or two days after that previous post, I had begun to notice some unusual skin just sort of all over the place. It was discolored, white, and seems wet. This pretty much set off alarm bells in my head like "no okay this doesn't seem right"
I reached out to McClung and he immediately saw me, thankfully due to a random same-day opening so it saved me a week of confused waiting. He told me at the time that my body was having a difficult time healing and was experiencing skin loss.
Not gonna' lie, when someone tells you that, it's really emotional. It was a really difficult two hour car ride home and really the next couple days were challenging. He put me on weekly follow ups and we had nothing much we could do but wait after putting me on multiple antibiotics.
Fast forward a bit, getting through a snafu with my pharmacy which delayed one of the two antibiotics by a couple days, and things just looked like they got worse but started to clear up. At my 3 week follow up, I received some even more news that really feels like I took a gut punch.
According to Dr. McClung, a revision surgery went from possible to "needed and within a month". Apparently, a portion (25%?) of my vaginal canal has lost its skin as well.
I lost some skin around the vaginal opening and it looks like the issue is also just inside the opening as well. The skin that died appears to be from the penile shaft, which is not something that seems super common. My internet digging just couldn't find much of anything around the issue. McClung states this issue can be fixed with a skin graft, but he has never had a patient with this complication before. He told me that he has to consult other experienced surgeons to ensure he has the correct solution for my case.
The only good news in the entire issue is that things weren't getting worse, my body had simply rejected skin used in the surgery. I did previously have a complication forcing me to go back in immediately after the operation, so we're questioning if something happened because of that. Regardless of the mechanism that caused it, I'm not in any immediate dangers but the complication will affect things cosmetically and functionally. I can already see the cosmetic damage that might result, but I am far, far less worried about cosmetic appearance. I care about functionality, plain and simple.
McClung started me on dilations, which are mildly uncomfortable but definitely not painful or difficult. It's mostly just annoying carving the time out of my day, so I quickly developed a routine that helps me be most comfortable during my dilation sessions and my boyfriend is here for moral support. I don't know how keen he was to do it given my situation, but not doing them would be more devastating than anything that I could accidentally do to myself dilating. I do not seem to be experiencing any real bleeding, I have only seen one dilation session where I had a very small amount of bleeding, but it stopped pretty much within a minute or two. I can't even really tell if I have sensation issues right now, since I can definitely feel the dilation and it feels about what I would expect it to feel like.
The only other thing we're waiting on now is for things to clear up a little more. I would be lying if I said I wasn't nervous, but I do have faith that his actions speak loudly and show that he cares about my case, since he is working so proactively to find best fit solution.
Tomorrow is another follow up, where hopefully I learn more. Hopefully in due time there will be a lot more positivity in a post here.
EDIT: So the follow up has a lot of positivity, I really won't wait another 2 weeks to share it. The dead skin has sloughed off completely both on the surface and inside the canal. We are now waiting and seeing if my body grows new skin in my canal or needs a graft. We 100% will be doing a revision to fix my clitoral hood, as the tissue dying caused it to part one way but it's a very simple fix. A lot less anxiety after that appointment. The body is already healing the surface skin that died, which should only scar a little bit and be just fine. It's a waiting game now to see just how much gets done during the revision.
Lol, he tried to fake some optimism there at the end, but you can just tell this whole thing is a disaster (even more than usual for stinkditches). He's too afraid to post a picture, after all.
He also suspects that shitting himself immediately after the surgery might be the cause or a contributing factor to a bunch of his skin dying and sloughing off. The mental image is just lovely. I'll be looking forward to any future updates.
----------------
Btw, I happened to find a metoidioplasty + vaginectomy done by Dr. McClung:
This doctor responded immediately and provided aftercare to someone with complications. That's a little better than the usual, I was surprised and glad to see that even though the surgery was the usual trashheap. Despite the terrible appearance and complications, they got lucky.
reached out to McClung and he immediately saw me, thankfully due to a random same-day opening so it saved me a week of confused waiting. He told me at the time that my body was having a difficult time healing and was experiencing skin loss.
Anyway, I think this is the first SRS video I've actually watched all the way through; this stuff makes me queasy, so I've been avoiding these kinds of videos, lol. 100x worse than just looking at still photos.
The worst part for me is where they degloved the penis, inverted it, and slipped the fish skin graft over it.
You should watch the video instead (if you have the stomach for it ). Really shows off the horror of SRS... true, unnatural butchery.
added to OP. excellent explanation of the history here.
Mastectomy is a painful but relatively safe surgery, like orchiectomy. Removing body parts that interfere with someone's functioning isn't bad at all.
The reason we remove secondary sex organs, but not arms and legs, is that you can in fact function normally in all but the reproductive sense without breasts or penis- but you can't without legs or arms.
Sure you can live a normal life after cutting off a healthy leg: You can get a prosthesis or a wheelchair for that matter.
The point isn’t whether mastectomies are safe or not, the point is that they shouldn’t be done as an elective surgert (and neither should amputating a limb!) because you have a mental illness and/or a severe paraphilia.
There is always a risk with surgery, and only when the consequences of NOT doing the surgery (such as cancer or a virtual certainty of cancer) outweighs that potential risk, should a mastectomy be allowed as a medical option.
Especially when we’re talking about a woman in her late teens or early twenties who is likely to change her mind later on. When there’s no going back.
(And here would be a good place to drop a reminder that the vast majority of cases of “gender dysphoria” in young women eventually resolve themselves.)
Anyway, I think this is the first SRS video I've actually watched all the way through; this stuff makes me queasy, so I've been avoiding these kinds of videos, lol. 100x worse than just looking at still photos.
The worst part for me is where they degloved the penis, inverted it, and slipped the fish skin graft over it.
You should watch the video instead (if you have the stomach for it
). Really shows off the horror of SRS... true, unnatural butchery.
Yes, congrats! You stumbled over the latest troon trend. Their literally use fish flaps for their “neovagina” in the never ending quest to have the biggest dick deepest vagina.
Ironically, the Tilapia thing was first developed as a way to treat real women with some sort of malformed or severely injured vagina.
But when troons heard about it, they put their big manly hands on it and started pushing for using the procedure for “neovaginas”.
(Which is exactly what will happen with womb transplants if the medical profession ever figures out how to practically and safely do them.)
Forgive me if this was posted before, but this article from pinknews "Trans men ‘let down’ and in ‘extreme distress’ as NHS quietly stops life-changing penis surgery".
You would think this means they stopped providing the surgery, but no, this only means they aren't doing it currently during a pandemic.
Noteworthy quotes such as “Nobody in their right mind would choose this, we have to – because the opposite is pain and not wanting to be here." Yes, no one in their right mind would choose this, so close yet far of understanding.
" Finlay’s phalloplasty took six surgeries over three years, which he thinks would have increased to a seven- or eight-year timeframe today, based on the current waiting lists." Imagine fucking it up so badly you might need up to seven or eight surgeries and this is no one but your own fault.
"Those who’ve been referred for phalloplasty by an NHS gender clinic have already been through an arduous period of waiting. In some parts of the country, trans people referred by their GP to a gender clinic wait five or more years for that crucial first appointment – with no support or treatment in the meantime."
Reminder this is a surgery done via free healthcare with no previous illness affecting body parts - such as breast cancer - or any need of actual medical treatment that affects someone physically. Yet they are still whining, cry me a river. The good part is, if you have to wait up to five years that is likely enough time for the excitement of the trend to wear off. Or so I hope.
He describes being “trapped” by the situation: “I’ve had stage one… so, I’ve got my penis, and I’ve also got everything else. I’ve not got testicles. It’s quite a lot to be going on down there.”
James says he’s in a relatively fortunate position – a job, supportive family – but “it’s still s**t for me”.
No fake balls so everything is still shit.
Miles had “absolutely none whatsoever” from NHS England or St Peters, and then, confusingly, had an appointment at an NHS gender clinic where the clinician allegedly denied that phalloplasty provision was on hold and went on a “wild rant” at Miles, telling him he was “stupid” for getting information about the situation from social media.
LOL doctors are getting fed up with the trans shit.
In addition to that, “the trans masculine community has one of the worst healthcare communication issues I’ve ever seen,” he says.
That’s in part due to clinicians who will insult phalloplasty, and pressure patients not to try and have them. They will s**t talk them all the time and say how awful they are.”
> Refer to pictures of this thread. Yes, they're awful, it's great how there are people working in free healthcare being honest about it.
“The in-between stages are so difficult to cope with, when you’re neither one or the other. You’ve got this penis that you can’t use, you can’t pee out of,” he says.
I've got news for you. You'll always be in a "neither one or the other." At best you always be the poor girl that got indoctrinated via internet trends and done a stupid fucking choice to mangle your genitals. You will never have a real dick you can use. Maybe with a lot of effort if your surgeon doesn't mess it up you can pee with it, but maybe this doesn't work - What you will do if that's the case?
In the end she only suggest that they need "more surgeons, more joined up care, a dedicate hospital". This article came from someone on tumblr, of course, which they wrote "human rights violation 1000%". Of course, unnecessary fake-dick surgery is a HUMAN RIGHT and if you stop it providing this cosmetic surgery in the middle of a worldwide health crisis is somehow human rights violation.
Sometimes i'm sorry for the person that is brain-washed to believe this shit so much they go after surgery, especially if they are women, because 99% of men -if not 100% of them - seek it out because of their disgusting fetishes, but half of the time i'm also leaned to not care because it's very likely people warned about the disaster that would happen if they insisted with it and the extreme arrogance and selfishness every troon has. In my opinion no free healthcare should give free surgery or hormones for troons, the only thing they should provide is therapy.
Nipples are high risk of cancer, so they get yeeted along with the rest of the breast in mastectomy for cases of actual breast cancer. Reconstruction is covered by insurance in the US, and patients get a lot of mindfuck from doctors and "awareness" campaigns to get immediate reconstruction -- "save the ta-tas" -- "hey, free boob job" -- how about putting women's health first instead of male gaze?
The reconstruction process is grueling and fraught with complications, and even without infections, skin necrosis, dehiscience, etc., patients still end up with a permanently numb tit that may or may not look anything like the other one.
Tissue expansion involves stretching the skin with weekly injections of saline into a bag placed under the skin until there's enough room for an implant. Reconstruction with donor tissue from the back or abdomen involves multiple surgical sites for the price of one, plus lots of scars and a weird patchwork effect on the reconstructed boob with mismatched skin tones and the possibility of pubic hair if relocated from an abdominal flap, or the loss of a muscle if taken from the back.
If you want nipples, there are medical tattoo artists who can draw them on for you. They're just there for looks and provide no benefit for the owner as they obviously have no erectile tissue and no sensation, erotic or otherwise.
Skipping the reconstruction and staying flat at least lets cancer patients heal faster and get on with their lives without months of procedures and revisions. And people literally do not even notice, let alone misgender the flat and fabulous because of the lack of boobs.
How about not assuming that women decide to get their breasts reconstructed and go through the long painful process because of men. Plenty of women do it because their breasts are important to themselves, their personal self esteem, and self image. Heck it's the reason female users here tend to have empathy, sympathy, and pity for TIFs who mutilate themselves like this, because they cannot imagine ever willing doing that to themselves or their perfectly health breasts. Breasts aren't just lumps and skin attached the body and plenty of women are fond of their own, their a source of confidence and they can nourish your children, they're a part of your erogenous zones.
The loss of your breasts to breast cancer is absolutely devastating to some women and their desire to attempt to replace them is fueled by their own desires to try and return some normalcy to their body and not just see a barren, flat, scarred stretch of skin in the mirror, not because they care what men think.
You can appreciate that individual women might choose reconstruction for good reasons, while also appreciating that the push for reconstruction is somewhat disturbing in the context of the rest of the health system and how it treats women.
For the same reason that it violates the Hippocratic Oath to treat Bodily Integrity Disorder by cutting off limbs...but totally "Right Side of History" to callously refuse care/treatment to anyone who says "I disagree" to the Chinese flu "vaccine" and bray like a jackass to social and print media about it.
Where has this happened? Refusing care like that would get a doctor fired (and possibly even criminally charged, depending on circumstances), and last I heard anti-vaxxers with covid were happily clogging up hospital beds across America while their lungs slowly turn crunchy.
Also, I got the vaccine and my 5G reception has been great ever since, so I don't know what you're complaining about.
Where has this happened? Refusing care like that would get a doctor fired (and possibly even criminally charged, depending on circumstances), and last I heard anti-vaxxers with covid were happily clogging up hospital beds across America while their lungs slowly turn crunchy.
Miles had “absolutely none whatsoever” from NHS England or St Peters, and then, confusingly, had an appointment at an NHS gender clinic where the clinician allegedly denied that phalloplasty provision was on hold and went on a “wild rant” at Miles, telling him he was “stupid” for getting information about the situation from social media.
LOL doctors are getting fed up with the trans shit.
Front-line health workers hate them guts, if for nothing else then for the simple reason that they hold up hospital beds and resources that could save someone truly in need. The "gender affirming" bullshit was dreamed up by admins who have never seen a patient or worked in a ward for the past 10 years, if ever.
Front-line health workers hate them guts, if for nothing else then for the simple reason that they hold up hospital beds and resources that could save someone truly in need. The "gender affirming" bullshit was dreamed up by admins who have never seen a patient or worked in a ward for the past 10 years, if ever.
You're right; I somehow missed those articles. I am surprised that it even made the news, since AFAIK this kind of thing is not new. A lot of pediatrician's offices refuse to take on pregnant women as prospective clients if they are not planning on vaccinating, because they don't want to risk measles getting all over their waiting room and killing a baby or two just because little Braëydën needed to be protected from the autism needles.
The FtM in the article literally ran to the media and complained just because someone told her that her stupid phalloplasty was stupid, so I can't imagine that many medical professionals with negative feelings are willing to be open about it.
I would like little more than to say, "That will never happen. There is no place to anchor a uterus, there is no way to provide sufficient blood flow to a uterus, there is no means of matching such an implant because sex influences rejection rates with transplantation, and there is no way even an implanted embryo could survive in a uterus implanted in a male body. No one would be so negligent as to even attempt it."
I would like to say all of that.
Unfortunately, some lunatic, like Bowers or Supron, will do this sooner or later. The patient will die.
And, when they do, the surgeon will probably be hailed as a "pioneer," the patient as a "martyr."
www.tampabay.com
I'll be looking forward to any future updates.
)
). Really shows off the horror of SRS... true, unnatural butchery.
