Manosphere Amud - The Balloon Loon, Loveshy Extraordinaire

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Hey, you wanna see this skull that I got? Its apparently a humanoid planthrid skull dated about 80,000 years ago. They apparently lived in caves because of the curvature of the skull signaling an ancestral complexity the likes of which is unable to be replicated today in modern laboratories.

Wait, you want to see it? No can do buddy. You can take my word for it BECAUSE I'M TRUSTWORTHY. You don't even know me, but just trust me regardless even though I have nothing to show for it. Scientists know these things.

The difference is that I actually did show you pictures of the skulls. If you had such a skull and showed me a picture of it, I would be more inclined to believe your conclusions about it, although I would naturally want to look at it myself and draw my own conclusions.
 
The difference is that I actually did show you pictures of the skulls. If you had such a skull and showed me a picture of it, I would be more inclined to believe your conclusions about it, although I would naturally want to look at it myself and draw my own conclusions.

You mean random shit that you got from Google and made batshit insane conclusions from? Yep.

The other difference is that you're a fucking idiot.
 
The difference is that I actually did show you pictures of the skulls. If you had such a skull and showed me a picture of it, I would be more inclined to believe your conclusions about it, although I would naturally want to look at it myself and draw my own conclusions.
You totally missed the point. I was being completely sarcastic to show you that you can't just say whatever you want without peer reviewed evidence if you want it to be seen as fact.

When I say "Citation Needed" I am telling you that if your work has not been tested by other scientists to see if it holds up to scrutiny then I have far less of a reason to believe you.

What if every Wikipedia article didn't have citations? You wouldn't be able to tell what is real and what was made up by someone else. If nobody else has tested your theories and seen if they are logically consistent then YOU ARE NOT ADHERING TO THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
 
If "bankid" doesn't mean "looks like a banker," what does it mean? Words used in actual anthropology mean things: "Homo sapiens" means "knowledgable man," for example, and "Homo erectus" means "upright man."

Whoever made up these classifications is so illiterate they just put "-id" onto the ends of common English words. That is not how actual scientific nomenclature works.
 
When I say "Citation Needed" I am telling you that if your work has not been tested by other scientists to see if it holds up to scrutiny then I have far less of a reason to believe you.

Friend, save yourself the effort. He believes that centuries of scientists who have lived and died around the world have a massive hugbox that is positioned against him directly. He can't have citations because by definition citations point to the establishment which is fundamentally opposed to him. Therefore it's his very lack of citations that makes him correct. Don't you get it???
 
Why can't I have multiple idea societies? I think a traditional society OR a hunter-gatherer society would both be preferable to whatever it is we have now.

Query: Why would you advocate such societies where you would likely not be able to survive in? With your lack of contributing to society or doing things for yourself, it quickly approaches a probability of one that you would die of exposure or lack of nutrition within either of these societies. To preempt your statement of how you would not die in these societies, explain why you wouldn't please.

They were forced to develop farming because after the ice age cleared up, the human population began to explode and hunting and gathering just didn't allow them to procure enough food to feed that growing population. Farming was not adopted by choice, but by necessity. Hunting and gathering is still the superior method, it's just that it is more effective for smaller populations.

That sounds very much akin to the Oasis Theory of Agriculture, which is one of the theories that is kind of on the marginal side, since the climate data counters the situation where this occurred. However, you could be referring to Demographics theory, which states similar reasons to this.

As an aside, why is hunting and gathering the superior method? What qualifies it as "better"? I'm asking because I think of method superiority as a mixture of food output and efficiency.

Farming allows the creation of more permanent settlements with larger populations. This enabled the creation of dysgenic things like medicine and economics. It also caused people to began eating inferior foods like grains, dairy, and soy. It reduced selective pressures, since farming takes less skill, athleticism, and perceptive ability than hunting.

How are grains and dairy inferior? Also, how would you know that farming is less intensive than hunting? How do you rate that?

I don't care what terminology is being used. The point is, the facial types on the chart are not the same thing as human races like white, black, or Asian. They are all subsets of the white race. We could call them subraces, phenotypes, sub-types, or whatever the hell we want to call them. The point is, they are not meant to replace the white/black/etc. races, they are meant to further refine the classification WITHIN the white race. Get it?

Query: would you count Persians as white? Just curious since you get interesting answers for and against depending on who you ask.

As an aside, you ever get your hands on some skulls and replicas of them to try out other theories of yours? Asking because the physical thing, or at least a copy would likely be far more useful than images of them.
 
Friend, save yourself the effort. He believes that centuries of scientists who have lived and died around the world have a massive hugbox that is positioned against him directly. He can't have citations because by definition citations point to the establishment which is fundamentally opposed to him. Therefore it's his very lack of citations that makes him correct. Don't you get it???
Similar to how he discredits actual accepted medical practices as "quacks" (oh shit my mistake, MODERN MEDICINE ITSELF apparently), but supports and believes actual quacks. If his standards aren't "the less evidence there is for a thing, the more he believes it," I don't know what they are.
How are grains and dairy inferior?
I'm particularly surprised he'd argue that dairy is inferior, since lactose tolerance in adults is a primarily European adaptation.
 
Why can't I have multiple idea societies? I think a traditional society OR a hunter-gatherer society would both be preferable to whatever it is we have now.
What is your idea of traditional society? To me, life has always seemed the same: get a job, avoid politics, maybe get married, and die after 60 if you're lucky. Which societies didn't have pre-marital sex, biracial marriage/breeding, sluts, and rampant homosexuality? What is your great society based on?Astound me with your insight.
I'm sorry I just saw him say he uses water as as lubricant when shoving condoms up his nose.... I don't think he understands that water isn't that great of a lube.
Now why would a loveshy not know how lube works?
 
They were forced to develop farming because after the ice age cleared up, the human population began to explode and hunting and gathering just didn't allow them to procure enough food to feed that growing population. Farming was not adopted by choice, but by necessity. Hunting and gathering is still the superior method, it's just that it is more effective for smaller populations.
You're confusing cause and effect. It is precisely farming, which is a more reliable source of sustenance than hunting/gathering, that enabled population growth, instead of the other way round. The population of an organism is always adjusted to the resources available: you first have a bonanza of food which then trigger a population increase, not the other way round. In a hunter/gatherer society, a population explosion beyond sustainability will only result in starvation and death.

Farming allows the creation of more permanent settlements with larger populations. This enabled the creation of dysgenic things like medicine and economics. It also caused people to began eating inferior foods like grains, dairy, and soy. It reduced selective pressures, since farming takes less skill, athleticism, and perceptive ability than hunting.
1) What do you mean by "dysgenic"?
2) It is meaningless to say whether the skills involved in hunting/gathering is superior or inferior to farming. Farming and animal husbandry simply require another set of skills (e.g. ability to foresee weather patterns and plan accordingly, to locate sources of irrigation, and to detect diseases in crops and lifestock)
3) I want to know in what ways you think grains, dairy and soy are inferior to... whatever the Neanderthals ate.

I'm sorry I just saw him say he uses water as as lubricant when shoving condoms up his nose.... I don't think he understands that water isn't that great of a lube.
He's a virgin.
 
Last edited:
The difference is that I actually did show you pictures of the skulls.
And then spewed out your completely made up bullshit.
If you had such a skull and showed me a picture of it...
You'd use your homemade Skyrim race chart to tell us what bonuses they'd get right?
I would be more inclined to believe your conclusions about it, although I would naturally want to look at it myself and draw my own conclusions.
Shouldn't you be stalking some mammoth right now, neanderthal boy? Or shoving condoms up your nose in an attempt to alter your deformed skull so you can trick some poor woman into thinking you don't have faulty genetics?
 
Farming allows the creation of more permanent settlements with larger populations. This enabled the creation of dysgenic things like medicine and economics. It also caused people to began eating inferior foods like grains, dairy, and soy. It reduced selective pressures, since farming takes less skill, athleticism, and perceptive ability than hunting.

Wait, medicine and economics are dysgenic? People not dying from polio and the bubonic plague is a step backwards?

... Well, fuck, dude, sure shows what I know.

Also, how are grains, dairy and soy inferior? How does farming take less skill than hunting? Farmers work pretty fucking hard, from sunrise to sundown, and provide food for those of us who do not have the luxury of going outside and killing an animal for food.

You're making even less sense than before, somehow.
 
Last edited:
They were forced to develop farming because after the ice age cleared up, the human population began to explode and hunting and gathering just didn't allow them to procure enough food to feed that growing population. Farming was not adopted by choice, but by necessity. Hunting and gathering is still the superior method, it's just that it is more effective for smaller populations.
Doesn't farming include raising animals for food and materials? Why would we resort to hunting and gathering when we can grow and raise our own food?

It also caused people to began eating inferior foods like grains, dairy, and soy. It reduced selective pressures, since farming takes less skill, athleticism, and perceptive ability than hunting.
Holy shit I can't even.

You need to seriously knock down that ego friend. I know you're self-conscious about your appearance and you probably are insecure about a lot of other things in your life, but you can't keep building your ego up to cover all of your faults. It's unhealthy and it's not going to land you much companionship outside of the toxic websites you browse.
The way you talk about women getting off from Slayids bullying Adenids leads me to think that you were hurt by someone or multiple people. I mean, you said yourself that you're mostly Adenid and you brought up an example of women taking satisfaction in Slayids pushing Adenids into lockers. Did that happen to you Amud?
You can talk to us buddy.
 
We could pay high school kids minimum wage to do it. You don't have to be smart or capable to perform simple medical procedures.
I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't think I'd want teenagers on minimum wage doing medical procedures on me.

Also, I like clean running water, soap, and anesthetic during surgery, among other things.
 
Last edited:
1. Good, I hope you like it there because you can be damn sure you would be deported.
2. Most people in prisons don't really belong there (non-violent drug crimes, etc.), so we could release a lot of them to make room for the newcomers.
3. Sure, why not? I never thought of that before, but it's of no concern to me.
4. We could pay high school kids minimum wage to do it. You don't have to be smart or capable to perform simple medical procedures.

Hear that, bitches? I'm going to Sweden. Du gamla, du fria..

#2 What would constitute prison time, aside from being inbred aristocratic banker scum? What do you do with people who commit non-violent crimes?

As for #4, uh. Pretty sure I don't want a fetus scraping out my fetus-maker. Just sayin'.
 
Farming allows the creation of more permanent settlements with larger populations. This enabled the creation of dysgenic things like medicine and economics. It also caused people to began eating inferior foods like grains, dairy, and soy. It reduced selective pressures, since farming takes less skill, athleticism, and perceptive ability than hunting.

Why are you still taking about things you know nothing about?
 
Back