You earlier in the thread
Or do you find the idea of convincing women to do onlyfans abhorrent?
This is what I call the "women can't be abused because they're adults" defense. You downplay that being flown into another country under false pretenses like marriage only to be housed with ewhores tasked with putting you to work is lying and coercion and a crime, but you say they were "convinced" so therefore it can't be abuse because they're adults who can make their own decisions, the same partyline as Andy and McBride and every Tater Tot
Uh, why are you putting words in my mouth I didn't say?
You retreat to this when held to your own words above, like Tate. You say the women were "convinced", as in, they agreed to the abuse so it can't have been abuse. Man up to your own words, unlike Andy.
Oh, I'm not here to convince anyone of anything.
Yes you are. You play dumb like every Tater Tot in the hopes someone reading will think "Wow, he was just asking questions and they couldn't prove anything!" like every Tater Tot ever
All your comments are the same tactic of playing dumb in an attempt to be persuasive.
"I'm too stupid to know what they did!"
*Tells you what they did
"I'm too stupid to know what the evidence is!"
*Tells you what the evidence is
"Me too stupid to know what that's evidence of!"
*Tells you what it's evidence of
"ME TOO STUPID TO KNOW IT'S EVIDENCE OF THAT"
*Tells you why it's evidence of that
"ME TOO STOOPED TO KNOW WHY THAT'S BAD"
*Tells you why it's bad
"ME TOO STOOPED TO KNOW WHY IT HASN'T GONE TO TRIAL"
*Tells you why it hasn't gone to trial
"MEE TOOO STHOOPAHT..."
On and on and on, and you'll never admit reality no matter how many times it's explained to you in simple enough terms for someone as stupid as you claim to be to understand, because it's all just a rhetorical trick to pretend there's no proof to someone else reading.
No one will fall for you playing dumb