animal control came - 6/22/18

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Controversial opinion. It’s one thing to talk shit on the internet. But if you’re really fucking with her in “real life” you’re a piece of shit. Just my 00.2 cents. Kiwifarms is great. But if you’re taking it off the internet and harrasing her IRL you’re a nutcase. And should be banned from here.
 
Does disabling comments or voting affect her revenue? Or is it just based on views?

She's shooting herself in her beetus foot, cause the only reason people would go to her actual page is to downvote her video and read the comments (since only the top 100 show up on Hooktube)
Revenue is only based on views (and number of ads allowed on video by creator)
You can disable comments, hide like dislike ratio without any effect to revenue. But usually comment activity brings more bucks since people keep on coming back to video to reply to other people commenting on the same video

Our dainty gorl disabled comments and hide dislike ratio before and her yewtoob buck stopped dramatically so she enabled them again. Believe me even she realises only way she's gonna get any revenue is thru her "haydurs" or legitimately losing weight but we all know that ain't happening anytime soon
 
Whoever called Animal Control has never actually seen real neglect/abuse, have they? Also, for some reason I feel like they didn't actually show up. Anyone else feeling that way, or is it just me being :dumb:?
 
Controversial opinion. It’s one thing to talk shit on the internet. But if you’re really fucking with her in “real life” you’re a piece of shit. Just my 00.2 cents. Kiwifarms is great. But if you’re taking it off the internet and harrasing her IRL you’re a nutcase. And should be banned from here.
I 've given this a little thought after having time to really watch the video and I have my own opinion also that might deviate from the norm. Clearly AL's bogus weightloss journey and her lying has grown old . She is getting a lot of shit thrown at her even by people who were staunch supporters. Also, people complaining about Twinkie's nails has been going on for awhile, and on many different social medias...So, what if NOBODY called animal control? I think there is at least a 50% chance that this is another lie.What if this was just another bunch of BS for her to play her favourite roll- the victim. Gorl is running out of angles. Poor Amberlynn everyone wants to "ruin her life" (eye roll). I mean Eric allegedly had AC knocking on the door in his vlog days ago. Even though AL is a slacker and is lazy, it just seems suspicious that she waited all this time to make this video. I would surmise that anyone would be incredibly pissed off if someone called the authorities, interfering in one's real life and would address it immediately. Not something that could wait almost a week. Then she over compensated with superfluous descriptions of the encounter, like the officer's uniform "literally looking professional with a shirt and the little things sayin' what he was....he literally called himself a professional...it's his job to take animals ". And then just more melodrama, including taking a picture, and the BS about the ACO telling her that abused animals act a certain way and Twinkie didn't act like that. C'mon. Anyone who has ever worked with dogs knows that some of the most abused dogs will still be loyal to their masters and will wag their tails happy to see them. No professional would ever make a nonsensical statement that they can tell abuse/neglect based upon attitude alone. IDK, I'm considering every possibility and this just seems off to me. BTW, how do you know AL is lying? Her lips are moving.
 
31816154_123980541804269_7081868817281843200_n.jpg
"If they could open me up and take my heart, they probably would"
No gorl.. no one wants your fat heart.

Yep... I'll pass.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I 've given this a little thought after having time to really watch the video and I have my own opinion also that might deviate from the norm. Clearly AL's bogus weightloss journey and her lying has grown old . She is getting a lot of shit thrown at her even by people who were staunch supporters. Also, people complaining about Twinkie's nails has been going on for awhile, and on many different social medias...So, what if NOBODY called animal control? I think there is at least a 50% chance that this is another lie.What if this was just another bunch of BS for her to play her favourite roll- the victim. Gorl is running out of angles. Poor Amberlynn everyone wants to "ruin her life" (eye roll). I mean Eric allegedly had AC knocking on the door in his vlog days ago. Even though AL is a slacker and is lazy, it just seems suspicious that she waited all this time to make this video. I would surmise that anyone would be incredibly pissed off if someone called the authorities, interfering in one's real life and would address it immediately. Not something that could wait almost a week. Then she over compensated with superfluous descriptions of the encounter, like the officer's uniform "literally looking professional with a shirt and the little things sayin' what he was....he literally called himself a professional...it's his job to take animals ". And then just more melodrama, including taking a picture, and the BS about the ACO telling her that abused animals act a certain way and Twinkie didn't act like that. C'mon. Anyone who has ever worked with dogs knows that some of the most abused dogs will still be loyal to their masters and will wag their tails happy to see them. No professional would ever make a nonsensical statement that they can tell abuse/neglect based upon attitude alone. IDK, I'm considering every possibility and this just seems off to me. BTW, how do you know AL is lying? Her lips are moving.
:thinking:
I just find it hard to believe that Kentucky spent tax dollars on going to a poor, rundown town to specifically check on an animal that had unclipped nails and was being smacked around a bit. Kentucky ranks dead fucking last for states with the best animal protection laws... Why was Twinkie so special?

Also, I have a hard time believing that the AC officer spent so much time chatting with AL. Without powerleveling, going to AL's house to do a welfare visit would be really intimidating. 3 unemployed, able-bodied assholes hanging around at home in the middle of the day; a large, smelly, loud woman yelling in my ear about how she's a good fur mama; Eric and Becky staring through the windows for the entire encounter; small town without many emergency services. I'm sure the AC officer wanted to get the fuck out of there before he got shot.

Edit: I do think AC went to her house, but I think she's really embellishing the truth. And I definitely don't believe the guy stuck around to chat with her.
Some of you take way too much offense to differing opinions.
 
Last edited:
I 've given this a little thought after having time to really watch the video and I have my own opinion also that might deviate from the norm. Clearly AL's bogus weightloss journey and her lying has grown old . She is getting a lot of shit thrown at her even by people who were staunch supporters. Also, people complaining about Twinkie's nails has been going on for awhile, and on many different social medias...So, what if NOBODY called animal control? I think there is at least a 50% chance that this is another lie.What if this was just another bunch of BS for her to play her favourite roll- the victim. Gorl is running out of angles. Poor Amberlynn everyone wants to "ruin her life" (eye roll). I mean Eric allegedly had AC knocking on the door in his vlog days ago. Even though AL is a slacker and is lazy, it just seems suspicious that she waited all this time to make this video. I would surmise that anyone would be incredibly pissed off if someone called the authorities, interfering in one's real life and would address it immediately. Not something that could wait almost a week. Then she over compensated with superfluous descriptions of the encounter, like the officer's uniform "literally looking professional with a shirt and the little things sayin' what he was....he literally called himself a professional...it's his job to take animals ". And then just more melodrama, including taking a picture, and the BS about the ACO telling her that abused animals act a certain way and Twinkie didn't act like that. C'mon. Anyone who has ever worked with dogs knows that some of the most abused dogs will still be loyal to their masters and will wag their tails happy to see them. No professional would ever make a nonsensical statement that they can tell abuse/neglect based upon attitude alone. IDK, I'm considering every possibility and this just seems off to me. BTW, how do you know AL is lying? Her lips are moving.

Everything you said is possible.
However, I feel like some whack job really did call animal control on her. It’s just my gut feeling. Of-course I agree that amber flourished the story. What really happened was probably some teenage minimal wage worker who barely passed high school pulled up in a beat up county truck as the local dog chaser and was told to go knock on the door. And he probably has a few fat poorly groomed dogs himself and saw Twinkie as “perfectly fine” and told her she was a good fur mama and they get calls like that all the time and then drove off to chase possums out of some other fat Kentucky woman’s garage or something.
 
Everything you said is possible.
However, I feel like some whack job really did call animal control on her. It’s just my gut feeling. Of-course I agree that amber flourished the story. What really happened was probably some teenage minimal wage worker who barely passed high school pulled up in a beat up county truck as the local dog chaser and was told to go knock on the door. And he probably has a few fat poorly groomed dogs himself and saw Twinkie as “perfectly fine” and told her she was a good fur mama and they get calls like that all the time and then drove off to chase possums out of some other fat Kentucky woman’s garage or something.
I also acknowledge that your scenario is possible. What I think many, if not most, of us who are hep to AL's ways can agree upon is that with AL we will never get the truth 100%. Also, because she is dumb as a bag of rocks and lies so often, she will trip up in the near future and contradict herself.
 
:thinking:
I just find it hard to believe that Kentucky spent tax dollars on going to a poor, rundown town to specifically check on an animal that had unclipped nails and was being smacked around a bit. Kentucky ranks dead fucking last for states with the best animal protection laws... Why was Twinkie so special?

Also, I have a hard time believing that the AC officer spent so much time chatting with AL. Without powerleveling, going to AL's house to do a welfare visit would be really intimidating. 3 unemployed, able-bodied assholes hanging around at home in the middle of the day; a large, smelly, loud woman yelling in my ear about how she's a good fur mama; Eric and Becky staring through the windows for the entire encounter; small town without many emergency services. I'm sure the AC officer wanted to get the fuck out of there before he got shot.

I wouldn't be surprised if more than one ween called AC on her.
 
I agree it's shitty to call AC but nobody here did it so can we get over it?

I just posted about this in General but since the convo is still going here I'll add:
The first visit from AC shouldn't be scary at all, they were probably very nice. I had the hope that AC would bring up the nails just so Ambug finally believes it's a problem, but alas. I never expected anything to actually happen to the animals. I can imagine AC bringing up the following issues:

a) animals not registered (this is required by law)
b) animals don't have proof of rabies vax (also required by law)
c) animals let out in an unfenced yard, unsupervised, not leashed or tied out (depends on the area whether this is a violation of the law or not)

The dogs would never be taken for these reasons, not until after numerous warnings and unpaid fines. That being said, option c) allows for the possibility that one of her IRL neighbors reported the house. But again, nothing would be done if the dogs aren't causing a nuisance and are not a threat to public safety, AC would look the other way.
Finally, AC most likely does not take animals and hold them unless we're talking like, a serious dog bite situation. They don't have room to just board animals like that.
 
Does disabling comments or voting affect her revenue?
In her specific case it does because many people only go to her channel to read/write comments.
Controversial opinion.
Actually, it's something that is strongly suggested here in the Farms. Most people who come to the Farms to brag about touching the poop is, at least, downvoted.
I feel like they didn't actually show up. Anyone else feeling that way, or is it just me being :dumb:?
I believe they did show up. I haven't watched the video (BTW, I recommend achieving this one. I have a feeling when she's done being mad, she'll pull this one), only a small clip about grapes and raisins(?) and she seemed very upset.
I would surmise that anyone would be incredibly pissed off if someone called the authorities, interfering in one's real life and would address it immediately. Not something that could wait almost a week.
She did. She probably pulled the camera out as soon as the AC person left the house. The fact that she only uploaded it a week (? was it more?) later is another story.
In her head Amber "won", she can wait to post a video gloating. In the unrealistic situation of the animals being taken, I'm sure she'd have made an emergency video and posted it immediately.
Then she over compensated with superfluous descriptions of the encounter
When does Amber not embellish her "woe is me" stories?
going to AL's house to do a welfare visit would be really intimidating.
Monticello is one of the worse towns in Kentucky, has very low employment rates, most people have low income, the education is rated at -F and there is problem with drugs.
That house was probably one of the best places the AC officer visited that week.
 
Haven't seen anyone mention this yet but she has disabled embedding on this video! I guess she is fine with letting everyone here watch on hooktube.

Kinda petty really.

F7NRk7A.png

Kind of wondered when she'd figure this out. She doesn't get a view unless you click through to YT itself. To actively make this change, she must have acknowledged that a wealth of her traffic comes from KF.

ETA: I would encourage everyone to use the hooktube link when uploading her videos. If you don't feel like navigating to hooktube itself you only need to replace the "youtube" with "hooktube" in the URL. If you want to, anyway. I'm not your mom.
 
Ween

Heh.

Damn, for a guy who created the rule, Null sure hates the word for it. Ok ,w.e.en or pozload my neghole it is. :). Don’t want to upset dear leader. Didn’t even think mods or anybody important read here. Or was there another overindulgence of the word in another thread?

I think somebody called on Amber and she lied about what happened. Of course AC didn’t tell her anything but there was no problem. He’s a busy guy who doesn’t have time to chat with a 550 lb girl and her obese (but not neglected) dog. And whoever it was apparently lied and said the dog had sores? If animal control warned or ticketed everybody who had an overweight animal they’d have to go to everybody’s house who is over 60.

But it was the biggest thing that happened in Amber’s month, so she has to embellish its importance, and also twist it so she comes out looking good. He’s never seen a better dog!! That’s Amber!

So she’s too upset to do new videos now?
 
small town without many emergency services. I'm sure the AC officer wanted to get the fuck out of there before he got shot.

I mean, she lives in a rural area but it's not like her town has only a couple hundred people in it. There are emergency services there.

I can imagine AC bringing up the following issues:

a) animals not registered (this is required by law)
b) animals don't have proof of rabies vax (also required by law)
c) animals let out in an unfenced yard, unsupervised, not leashed or tied out (depends on the area whether this is a violation of the law or not)

The dogs would never be taken for these reasons, not until after numerous warnings and unpaid fines. That being said, option c) allows for the possibility that one of her IRL neighbors reported the house. But again, nothing would be done if the dogs aren't causing a nuisance and are not a threat to public safety, AC would look the other way.
Finally, AC most likely does not take animals and hold them unless we're talking like, a serious dog bite situation. They don't have room to just board animals like that.

Eh. The laws vary by state/county/town so much that you can't say for sure it would be required for her to license her pets or against the law to not vaccinate. The chances are high that it is a city or county ordinance but I couldn't find dick online that says either way. I live in an area of the US that is less populated than Amber and you don't see much for requirements on pets in town, save for not allowing for farm animals in town limits.

Everyone knows Amber lies so it's not like she was going to make herself look bad in a regurgitated conversation.
 
Not really. Almost all areas require that you license your dog. Just because most people don't do it doesn't mean the law isn't on the books. And "law" vs "ordinance" is semantics in this context. The point is AC would've brought up these things if they really visited her. (IIRC she lives in Madison county where licensing is required.)

But as I said earlier nothing will come of it they were probably very friendly and won't be back, and AL was just m i l king the experience like the drama queen she is.

Likewise, for anyone who's curious, almost every state requires rabies vaccinations including KY.
https://www.avma.org/Advocacy/StateAndLocal/Pages/rabies-vaccination.aspx

edit: lol I just realized you're the same user from before. I'm not trying to be argumentative with you, I swear! :)
 
Back
Top Bottom