I don't want to be a pain in the neck over this, but the argument you're giving me here is the exact reason why if I decided to do something of this sort, I'd choose that name.
It's the "I know that they know" game, the fact that you'll be more prone to believe I'm the real deal if I use a semi obscure name, but ultimately well known by the people who read and analyze DSP chat on a daily basis. Barely takes 2 steps when determining what results will my attempt give if I know you're holding that reasoning.
Obviously I could be 100% wrong, and you can believe whatever you want.
But the argument you're giving is literally the same one that Phil tried to use when he insisted that the Champions account didn't belong to him and was just a troll who impersonated him to get a rise out of people.
To clarify, I don't think your logic is off. That is absolutely 100% what someone of average intelligence would do. But, we're in the goutsphere, the domain of dents. This is someone who was so mad at DSP they decided to get "revenge" by being his janitor for over a year, tease potentially damaging evidence, only to not release anything of substance, actively refusing to share his evidence and inadvertently making it easier for Phil to insist it was made up. And that's not even getting into any of the furry/pedo/diaper nonsense. A dude like that is absolutely stupid enough to use the same alias. I'm legitimately surprised he even managed to use a sock and not default right to Anonymouse again. Then again, I guess if Phil can learn to not use the same handle over and over after being called out, his former janitor can learn as well.
So, if it isn't him, the alternative is it's someone trolling. But where's the troll? If the account was spamming pedo shit or alluding to diaper talk or something in chat, I'd definitely agree that it was a troll impersonator. And why make an anonymouse reference of all things now? He wasn't exactly a big player in the grand scheme of things. Although, I guess this being the goutsphere cuts both ways, given that a fair amount of people think the way to own Phil is throw money at them, it's not impossible this is some weird trolling scheme. Though along those same lines, troll account names aren't exactly subtle when they're pretending to be an impersonator, see all the Derich/SnowKarls/Horse names.
I'll also add since tone doesn't convey over text particularly well, I have no objection to speculation. I certainly can't say with 100% certainty it is Anonymouse, I just don't think there's currently enough there to suggest it's a troll. To potentially add further evidence towards it being anony, he's also shown he lacks the willpower to stay away from a community, even after being humiliated. Look how many times he came crawling back here. I don't think it's too absurd to suggest he's doing that again with Phil. I'm curious (at least as curious as anyone can be about something so trivial) to see if the account posts again.