Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're not going to.
They're not going to.
Likely because it repeats all the troon genocide bullshit that trannies like to push and makes troons look even worse than they already do. There's already a mass peaking. Having a Pooner freak that murdered kids stating they did it for all the standard troon talking points will just make the Cathedrals pets look even worse.
I’m pretty sure that if that was possible, it would have happened by now.Hope some whistleblower leaks it out, if that's even possible.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A lawsuit over whether the families of school shooting victims have a right to control what the public learns about a massacre was argued inside a packed Tennessee courtroom on Monday, the latest turn in an intense public records battle.
The person who killed three 9-year-old children and three adults at a private Christian elementary school in Nashville this spring left behind at least 20 journals, a suicide note and a memoir, according to court filings. The debate over those writings and other records has pitted grieving parents and traumatized children against a coalition which includes two news organizations, a state senator and a gun-rights group.
That coalition requested police records on the Covenant School shooting through the Tennessee Public Records Act earlier this year. When the Metro Nashville Police Department declined their request, they sued. Metro government attorneys have said the records can be made public, but only after the investigation is officially closed, which could take months. The groups seeking the documents say the case is essentially over since the only suspect is dead — the shooter was killed by police — so the records should be immediately released.
But that argument has taken a back seat to a different question: What rights do victims have, and who is a legitimate party to a public records case?
Chancery Court Judge I’Ashea Myles ruled in May that a group of more than 100 Covenant families could intervene in the case. The families are seeking to keep the police records from ever seeing the light of day.
On Monday, the state Appeals Court panel heard arguments on whether Myles acted within the law when she allowed the families — along with the Covenant School and the Covenant Presbyterian Church that share its building — to intervene.
Speaking for the families, attorney Eric Osborne said the lower court was right to allow it because, “No one has greater interest in this case than the Covenant School children and the parents acting on their behalf.”
The families submitted declarations to the court laying out in detail what their children have gone through since the March 27 shooting, Osborne said. They also filed a report from an expert on childhood trauma from mass shootings. That evidence shows “the release of documents will only aggravate and grow their psychological harm,” he said.
Attorney Paul Krog, who represents one of the news organizations seeking the records, countered that the arguments from the families, the school and the church are essentially policy arguments that should be decided by the legislature, not legal ones to be decided by the courts.
The Tennessee Public Records Act allows any resident of the state to request records that are held by a state or local government agency. If there are no exceptions in the law requiring that record to be kept private, then the agency is required to release it. If the agency refuses, the requestor has a right to sue, and that right is spelled out in state law.
Nothing in the Public Records Act, however, allows for a third party to intervene in that lawsuit to try to prevent the records from being released, Krog told the court.
“This isn’t a case about what public policy ought to be. It’s a case about what the statute says,” he argued.
Although people have been allowed to intervene in at least two Tennessee public records cases in the past, no one ever challenged those interventions, so no state court has ever had to decide whether those interventions were proper.
The Covenant case is complicated by the fact that the shooter, who police say was “assigned female at birth,” seems to have identified as a transgender man.
U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley, of Missouri, is among those promoting a theory that the shooting was a hate crime against Christians. The refusal to release the shooter’s writings has fueled speculation — particularly in conservative circles — regarding what the they might contain and conspiracy theories about why police won’t release them.
they act like this troon wrote down secret launch codes or some shit. whatever they wrote down must paint troons in such a bad like that they think the second it gets public TTD will actually happen. thats the only reason i can think of as to why they are refusing to release it.
Maybe I'm being too charitable, but wasn't the other possible reason floating around that the manifesto was about being diddled at that school? If I remember, it had accusations or something from the time Audrey attended.the only reason i can think of as to why they are refusing to release it.
Maybe I'm being too charitable, but wasn't the other possible reason floating around that the manifesto was about being diddled at that school? If I remember, it had accusations or something from the time Audrey attended.
Yeah, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was at the root of both the trooning-out and the shooting, given the evidence I've seen, this thread on X for example, which includes several sources (the link is to a Nitter instance): -Maybe I'm being too charitable, but wasn't the other possible reason floating around that the manifesto was about being diddled at that school? If I remember, it had accusations or something from the time Audrey attended.
This does give me some pause on the theory, really interesting.I think there were TWO christian schools she considered for her massacre.
I'm inclined to agree with this, the prevailing opinion that the manifesto would be a spiritbomb that commences TTD has always felt a bit too copeful to be realistic. Above makes me second-guess it, though. I wonder if we'll ever know, maybe one of these lawsuits will get it out.It's extremely rare for a mass shooter to be a woman, and I think this is FAR more likely to be some kind of deluded revenge attack rather than her doing some "die cis scum" rampage due to "transphobia".
yeah, i used to be heavily on team copium, that is releasing her manifesto would lead to TTD which is why they havent. but recently im more coming ot the side that it details her being diddled and a pretty horrible or wide spread coverup of it and so they fear large pubic scandal if it is released.Yeah, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was at the root of both the trooning-out and the shooting, given the evidence I've seen, this thread on X for example, which includes several sources (the link is to a Nitter instance): -
Even if she developed a hate for Christians, I think there's a big chance it was because of the hypocrisy of several of them covering up for pedos and sex offenders, as evidenced in the thread I linked to.
It's extremely rare for a mass shooter to be a woman, and I think this is FAR more likely to be some kind of deluded revenge attack rather than her doing some "die cis scum" rampage due to "transphobia".
The guys of American Thinker wondered the same question in that article.
October 20, 2023
Police should follow the law in the Nashville shooter manifesto case
By Michael A. Letts
It’s been nearly seven months since a transgender man entered the Covenant School in Tennessee and shot and murdered three nine-year-old children and three adults. According to court filings, this murderer left behind at least 20 journals, a suicide note, and a memoir.
Yet, they have not been released to the public to allow for an understanding of the killer’s motive. Leftists have fought against the release, either knowing or fearing what information the documents contain. The parents of many of the children at the school had fought the release, not wanting to reopen their grief.
When a group that included news organizations, a gun-rights group, and a Tennessee state senator requested the records through the Tennessee Public Records Act, the Metro Nashville Police Department refused. The group sued the police, and it recently went to court.
“Metro government attorneys have said the records can be made public, but only after the investigation is officially closed, which could take months. The groups seeking the documents say the case is essentially over since the only suspect is dead -- the shooter was killed by police -- so the records should be immediately released,” according to the Associated Press.
Earlier this year, a judge ruled that the parents have a right to argue against the writings being made public. That is what is being heard in the appeals court now.
There’s nothing wrong in allowing the parents to speak their minds. It’s much like family members making a victim impact statement during a trial. It does not mean that their opinion in this case is the correct one. It means it is their opinion, but the law should be followed.
However, had the killer been captured instead of killed, these documents would have been evidence presented during trial and made public. Because there will be no trial does not mean the evidence collected should remain private.