- Joined
- Jan 22, 2024
This is getting ridiculous, I must admit, and will probably result in some rule changes. What is particularly weird to me, though, is that a lot of these deals aren't even unreasonable. Like, Tanner Scott's deal was 4 years for 72 million, and that doesn't seem obscene to me for Tanner Scott. I'm surprised the Phillies, Red Sox, or Braves really didn't want to try and add a couple million to that to bring him over instead. I just don't understand what other large market teams are doing. It has literally just been the Yanks, Mets, and Dodgers getting these large players.After all their signings already the Dodgers have signed two of the top relievers Kirby Yates and Tanner Scott. Their hoarding of talent in the offseason after a WS win is triggering discussion of new payroll and balance rules. https://www.newsweek.com/sports/mlb...-discussions-about-baseball-economics-2018044
Also, I don't know the details of the Yates deal yet, but it could be one that might bite them in the butt. He was fantastic last year, I saw it with my own two eyes, but he didn't pitch a whole lot since he was the closer on an anemic Rangers offense. If the Dodgers want to use him more than a standard closer (which I assume they will since he probably won't be the closer), then he probably will get injured since he is old and prone to that. Could be wrong, I don't know.

